Climate Cost Index (CCI) — Methodology

Version: 1.1

Published: 2026

Maintained by: Climate Cost / climatecost.org


1. Purpose & Scope

The Climate Cost Index (CCI) is an open, versioned methodology for estimating the embodied carbon footprint of consumer product categories. It is designed to serve three audiences:

The CCI covers embodied carbon only — that is, greenhouse gas emissions associated with the extraction, processing, manufacturing, and transport of physical goods. It does not cover use-phase energy consumption or end-of-life emissions, except where noted in individual category pages.

All emissions are expressed in kilograms of CO₂ equivalent (kgCO₂e) using IPCC AR6 100-year global warming potential (GWP100) values.


2. Foundational Principles

2.1 Conservative-First Scoring

The CCI defaults to worst-case plausible assumptions for every category. This means:

This approach is deliberately anti-greenwashing. The burden of proof is on suppliers to demonstrate lower emissions — not on the wiki to assume them. A product's score can only improve through verified data submitted via the Provenance Override process (see Section 7).

2.2 Full Lifecycle Coverage (Cradle-to-Gate)

The CCI covers emissions from raw material extraction through point of manufacture (cradle-to-gate). This aligns with ISO 14067 and PAS 2050 scope for embodied carbon. For categories where transport to end consumer represents a significant emissions source (e.g., imported goods), a transport module is added and disclosed separately.

2.3 Scope 1 / Scope 2 / Scope 3 Decomposition

Every CCI score is broken into three components aligned with the GHG Protocol:

For most consumer goods, Scope 3 (upstream) represents 70–90% of total embodied carbon. The CCI makes this visible rather than obscuring it in aggregate figures.

2.4 Transparency by Default

Every score on Climate Cost includes:

No score is published without a source trail. Where data quality is low, this is flagged explicitly with a confidence rating (see Section 6).


3. Emission Factor Sources

The CCI draws from the following primary data sources, in order of preference:

Priority Source Why
1 Peer-reviewed LCA studies (Journal of Industrial Ecology, Nature Scientific Data, Int'l J. of LCA) Highest methodological rigor
2 ISO 14067-compliant Product Carbon Footprints (PCFs) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) Verified, standardized
3 CDP Carbon Catalogue (866 product PCFs from public company disclosures) Large dataset, disclosed under CDP framework
4 EPA Supply Chain Emission Factors for U.S. Industries (USEEIO) Government-sourced, EEIO methodology
5 Ecoinvent LCA database (reference use only; not licensed) Industry standard background data
6 IPCC AR6 Emission Factors Authoritative for material-level GWP values
7 IEA Electricity Grid Carbon Intensity by Country Grid mix for Scope 2 calculations
8 GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard + Category 1 Guidance Methodological alignment

Where multiple sources are available for a category, the CCI uses a weighted average or selects the most conservative estimate, documented explicitly on the category page.


4. Category Score Calculation

4.1 The CCI Formula

Each category receives a default CCI score expressed as:

CCIdefault = S1 + S2 + S3

(kgCO₂e per functional unit)

S1 = Σ (process emission factori × activityi) — direct manufacturing emissions

S2 = energy consumed (kWh) × grid intensity (gCO₂e/kWh) — purchased electricity and heat

S3 = Σ (material massj × emission factorj) + transport emissions — upstream value chain

All values use IPCC AR6 GWP100 factors. Grid intensity from IEA country-level data. Material emission factors from the source hierarchy in Section 3.

Where S1, S2, and S3 represent scope-specific emission contributions estimated from the methodology above.

For categories where "per unit" is ambiguous (apparel, raw materials, packaging), scores are also expressed as kgCO₂e per kilogram of product.

4.1.1 Worked Example — Smartphone

This walks through how the CCI score for the Smartphones category (75 kgCO₂e per unit) is calculated:

Step 1: Define the functional unit

One smartphone device (~200 g), cradle-to-gate. Manufacturing region: China (Guangdong).

Step 2: Calculate Scope 3 (upstream materials)

Component Mass (g) EF (kgCO₂e/kg) kgCO₂e
ICs & semiconductors30~77023.1
OLED display35~34011.9
Li-ion battery50~20010.0
Aluminum enclosure50~160.8
Camera modules10~5005.0
Other + packaging + transport25~45011.2
Scope 3 Total62.0

Step 3: Calculate Scope 2 (factory electricity)

Assembly energy estimate: ~21 kWh per device (SMT, test, burn-in, clean room HVAC)

S2 = 21 kWh × 565 gCO₂e/kWh = 11,865 gCO₂e ≈ 12 kgCO₂e

Step 4: Calculate Scope 1 (direct process emissions)

Soldering flux combustion, cleaning solvent emissions, on-site vehicles. Estimated at ~1 kgCO₂e per device — minimal for electronics assembly.

Step 5: Sum the CCI score

CCI = S1 + S2 + S3 = 1 + 12 + 62 = 75 kgCO₂e per unit

Cross-referenced against Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max PER (74 kgCO₂e) and Samsung Galaxy S24 Carbon Trust data. Ceiling rounding applied — displayed scores always round up to avoid undercounting.

4.2 Material Composition Assumptions

For each category, a default bill of materials is defined based on the most common or most emissions-intensive composition found in the literature. Example:

Material composition assumptions are published in full on each category page.

4.3 Manufacturing Geography

Grid carbon intensity varies dramatically by country. The CCI uses IEA country-level carbon intensity factors to calculate Scope 2 emissions for each category's assumed manufacturing location.

Default manufacturing locations are set to the highest-emission plausible geography for that product category, unless peer-reviewed literature provides strong evidence for a different global average. These defaults are documented and versioned.

Examples:

Category Default Manufacturing Region Grid Intensity Used
Smartphones China (Guangdong) ~580 gCO₂e/kWh
Cotton Apparel Bangladesh / India ~620–700 gCO₂e/kWh
Aluminum Packaging Global average smelter ~1,600 gCO₂e/kg Al (process-dominant)
Furniture — Wood Southeast Asia / China ~550 gCO₂e/kWh

4.4 Regional Variation Module

For users in different markets, the CCI includes a regional variation note on each category page. This adjusts Scope 2 assumptions for locally manufactured alternatives (e.g., EU-produced goods benefit from lower-carbon grid mixes).

Regional variation does not change the default CCI score — it is provided as context. The default always reflects worst-case plausible, not regional average.


5. Scope Breakdown & Hotspot Analysis

Each category page includes a hotspot analysis — the top 3–5 emission drivers within the total score, with their estimated percentage contribution. This is designed to help sustainability teams identify where intervention has the most impact.

Example (Smartphone):

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
PCB & semiconductor manufacturing S3 ~35%
Battery (Li-ion cell production) S3 ~25%
Display manufacturing S3 ~20%
Assembly energy S2 ~10%
Packaging & transport S3 ~10%

Hotspot percentages are estimates derived from the literature and are reviewed with each methodology version update.


6. Data Quality & Confidence Ratings

Not all categories have equal data depth. The CCI assigns each category a confidence rating:

Rating Meaning
⬤⬤⬤ High Multiple peer-reviewed LCAs available; EPDs or PCFs on file; strong methodological consensus
⬤⬤◯ Medium Some peer-reviewed data; supplemented with EEIO or database estimates; moderate uncertainty
⬤◯◯ Low Limited primary literature; estimate derived primarily from EEIO or analogous categories; high uncertainty

Low-confidence scores are still published — because a conservative estimate is more useful than silence — but are flagged prominently with a disclosure on the category page.


7. Provenance Override — Supplier Data Submission

The CCI is designed to be improved by verified real-world data. Suppliers, brands, and manufacturers can submit a Provenance Override request to update their product's score if they can provide verified documentation.

7.1 Accepted Evidence Types

Evidence Type Description Score Impact
ISO 14067 PCF / EPD Third-party verified product carbon footprint Full override of default
Scope 1 + 2 Verification Report Third-party verified facility-level S1/S2 data Partial override (S1+S2 only)
Renewable Energy Certificate (REC / REGO) Matched to production volume S2 reduction
Recycled Content Certification Third-party verified recycled input % S3 reduction (material-specific)

7.2 Process

  1. Supplier submits documentation via the enterprise app (Tier 2)
  2. Climate Cost reviews documentation for standard compliance
  3. If validated: product receives a Verified CCI Score displayed alongside the default
  4. Source documentation is linked publicly
  5. Independent expert reviews borderline submissions

Provenance Override does not remove the default CCI score from the wiki. Both scores are shown, labeled clearly.


8. Methodology Versioning

The CCI methodology is versioned using a MAJOR.MINOR system:

All historical versions are archived. Every category page displays the methodology version under which its score was calculated. When the methodology updates, category scores are flagged for review.

Current version: 1.1

8.1 Version History

Version Date Status Changes
1.1 April 2026 Current Display rounding changed from nearest to ceiling (round-up) to avoid undercounting. Tiered formatting: integers above 10, 1 decimal 1–9.99, 2 decimals below 1. No underlying data changes.
1.0 April 2026 Superseded Initial public methodology. 30 categories, 5 concept pages, 10 product deep dives. Conservative-first scoring, 8-tier source hierarchy, Scope 1/2/3 decomposition.
2.0 TBD Planned Independent expert validation of emission factors, formula calibration, confidence rating adjustments. Peer review of worked examples.
1.2 TBD Planned Source update cycle: incorporate 2025 IEA grid factors, new EPD data, community-submitted corrections. Add regional variation modules.

9. What the CCI Does Not Cover

To be explicit about scope limitations:


10. Governance & Review

Maintained by: Climate Cost (climatecost.org)

Review cycle: Annual full methodology review; ad hoc updates when major new data sources are published

Community feedback: Flagging and feedback available on every category page (enterprise users) and via public GitHub issues

The full methodology, including version history, is published at climatecost.org/methodology and in the public GitHub repository.


11. Citation

To cite the Climate Cost Index methodology:

Climate Cost. (2026). Climate Cost Index (CCI) Methodology, Version 1.1. climatecost.org/methodology