Climate Cost Index (CCI) — Methodology
Version: 1.1
Published: 2026
Maintained by: Climate Cost / climatecost.org
1. Purpose & Scope
The Climate Cost Index (CCI) is an open, versioned methodology for estimating the embodied carbon footprint of consumer product categories. It is designed to serve three audiences:
- The public: A free, accessible reference for understanding the carbon embedded in everyday goods
- Sustainability professionals: A consistent, sourceable baseline for supply chain carbon accounting
- Suppliers: A transparent framework against which verified product-level data can be submitted and scored
The CCI covers embodied carbon only — that is, greenhouse gas emissions associated with the extraction, processing, manufacturing, and transport of physical goods. It does not cover use-phase energy consumption or end-of-life emissions, except where noted in individual category pages.
All emissions are expressed in kilograms of CO₂ equivalent (kgCO₂e) using IPCC AR6 100-year global warming potential (GWP100) values.
2. Foundational Principles
2.1 Conservative-First Scoring
The CCI defaults to worst-case plausible assumptions for every category. This means:
- Highest-emission material compositions are assumed where composition is variable
- Highest-emission manufacturing geographies are used as defaults
- No credit is given for recycled content unless verified
- No credit is given for renewable energy unless verified
This approach is deliberately anti-greenwashing. The burden of proof is on suppliers to demonstrate lower emissions — not on the wiki to assume them. A product's score can only improve through verified data submitted via the Provenance Override process (see Section 7).
2.2 Full Lifecycle Coverage (Cradle-to-Gate)
The CCI covers emissions from raw material extraction through point of manufacture (cradle-to-gate). This aligns with ISO 14067 and PAS 2050 scope for embodied carbon. For categories where transport to end consumer represents a significant emissions source (e.g., imported goods), a transport module is added and disclosed separately.
2.3 Scope 1 / Scope 2 / Scope 3 Decomposition
Every CCI score is broken into three components aligned with the GHG Protocol:
- Scope 1: Direct emissions from manufacturing processes (combustion, chemical reactions, on-site fleet)
- Scope 2: Indirect emissions from purchased electricity and heat consumed during production
- Scope 3: All upstream value chain emissions — raw material extraction, processing, transportation of inputs, supplier operations
For most consumer goods, Scope 3 (upstream) represents 70–90% of total embodied carbon. The CCI makes this visible rather than obscuring it in aggregate figures.
2.4 Transparency by Default
Every score on Climate Cost includes:
- The emission factor sources used
- The assumptions made
- The methodology version applied
- The date of last review
No score is published without a source trail. Where data quality is low, this is flagged explicitly with a confidence rating (see Section 6).
3. Emission Factor Sources
The CCI draws from the following primary data sources, in order of preference:
| Priority | Source | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peer-reviewed LCA studies (Journal of Industrial Ecology, Nature Scientific Data, Int'l J. of LCA) | Highest methodological rigor |
| 2 | ISO 14067-compliant Product Carbon Footprints (PCFs) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) | Verified, standardized |
| 3 | CDP Carbon Catalogue (866 product PCFs from public company disclosures) | Large dataset, disclosed under CDP framework |
| 4 | EPA Supply Chain Emission Factors for U.S. Industries (USEEIO) | Government-sourced, EEIO methodology |
| 5 | Ecoinvent LCA database (reference use only; not licensed) | Industry standard background data |
| 6 | IPCC AR6 Emission Factors | Authoritative for material-level GWP values |
| 7 | IEA Electricity Grid Carbon Intensity by Country | Grid mix for Scope 2 calculations |
| 8 | GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard + Category 1 Guidance | Methodological alignment |
Where multiple sources are available for a category, the CCI uses a weighted average or selects the most conservative estimate, documented explicitly on the category page.
4. Category Score Calculation
4.1 The CCI Formula
Each category receives a default CCI score expressed as:
CCIdefault = S1 + S2 + S3
(kgCO₂e per functional unit)
S1 = Σ (process emission factori × activityi) — direct manufacturing emissions
S2 = energy consumed (kWh) × grid intensity (gCO₂e/kWh) — purchased electricity and heat
S3 = Σ (material massj × emission factorj) + transport emissions — upstream value chain
All values use IPCC AR6 GWP100 factors. Grid intensity from IEA country-level data. Material emission factors from the source hierarchy in Section 3.
Where S1, S2, and S3 represent scope-specific emission contributions estimated from the methodology above.
For categories where "per unit" is ambiguous (apparel, raw materials, packaging), scores are also expressed as kgCO₂e per kilogram of product.
4.1.1 Worked Example — Smartphone
This walks through how the CCI score for the Smartphones category (75 kgCO₂e per unit) is calculated:
Step 1: Define the functional unit
One smartphone device (~200 g), cradle-to-gate. Manufacturing region: China (Guangdong).
Step 2: Calculate Scope 3 (upstream materials)
| Component | Mass (g) | EF (kgCO₂e/kg) | kgCO₂e |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICs & semiconductors | 30 | ~770 | 23.1 |
| OLED display | 35 | ~340 | 11.9 |
| Li-ion battery | 50 | ~200 | 10.0 |
| Aluminum enclosure | 50 | ~16 | 0.8 |
| Camera modules | 10 | ~500 | 5.0 |
| Other + packaging + transport | 25 | ~450 | 11.2 |
| Scope 3 Total | 62.0 | ||
Step 3: Calculate Scope 2 (factory electricity)
Assembly energy estimate: ~21 kWh per device (SMT, test, burn-in, clean room HVAC)
S2 = 21 kWh × 565 gCO₂e/kWh = 11,865 gCO₂e ≈ 12 kgCO₂e
Step 4: Calculate Scope 1 (direct process emissions)
Soldering flux combustion, cleaning solvent emissions, on-site vehicles. Estimated at ~1 kgCO₂e per device — minimal for electronics assembly.
Step 5: Sum the CCI score
CCI = S1 + S2 + S3 = 1 + 12 + 62 = 75 kgCO₂e per unit
Cross-referenced against Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max PER (74 kgCO₂e) and Samsung Galaxy S24 Carbon Trust data. Ceiling rounding applied — displayed scores always round up to avoid undercounting.
4.2 Material Composition Assumptions
For each category, a default bill of materials is defined based on the most common or most emissions-intensive composition found in the literature. Example:
- Smartphone: Default assumes aluminum casing, lithium-ion battery (cobalt-heavy chemistry), display glass, printed circuit board assembly, and packaging. No recycled content assumed.
- Cotton T-Shirt: Default assumes conventional (non-organic) cotton, grown in a water-intensive region, dyed with conventional processes, manufactured in a high-emission grid country.
Material composition assumptions are published in full on each category page.
4.3 Manufacturing Geography
Grid carbon intensity varies dramatically by country. The CCI uses IEA country-level carbon intensity factors to calculate Scope 2 emissions for each category's assumed manufacturing location.
Default manufacturing locations are set to the highest-emission plausible geography for that product category, unless peer-reviewed literature provides strong evidence for a different global average. These defaults are documented and versioned.
Examples:
| Category | Default Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity Used |
|---|---|---|
| Smartphones | China (Guangdong) | ~580 gCO₂e/kWh |
| Cotton Apparel | Bangladesh / India | ~620–700 gCO₂e/kWh |
| Aluminum Packaging | Global average smelter | ~1,600 gCO₂e/kg Al (process-dominant) |
| Furniture — Wood | Southeast Asia / China | ~550 gCO₂e/kWh |
4.4 Regional Variation Module
For users in different markets, the CCI includes a regional variation note on each category page. This adjusts Scope 2 assumptions for locally manufactured alternatives (e.g., EU-produced goods benefit from lower-carbon grid mixes).
Regional variation does not change the default CCI score — it is provided as context. The default always reflects worst-case plausible, not regional average.
5. Scope Breakdown & Hotspot Analysis
Each category page includes a hotspot analysis — the top 3–5 emission drivers within the total score, with their estimated percentage contribution. This is designed to help sustainability teams identify where intervention has the most impact.
Example (Smartphone):
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| PCB & semiconductor manufacturing | S3 | ~35% |
| Battery (Li-ion cell production) | S3 | ~25% |
| Display manufacturing | S3 | ~20% |
| Assembly energy | S2 | ~10% |
| Packaging & transport | S3 | ~10% |
Hotspot percentages are estimates derived from the literature and are reviewed with each methodology version update.
6. Data Quality & Confidence Ratings
Not all categories have equal data depth. The CCI assigns each category a confidence rating:
| Rating | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ⬤⬤⬤ High | Multiple peer-reviewed LCAs available; EPDs or PCFs on file; strong methodological consensus |
| ⬤⬤◯ Medium | Some peer-reviewed data; supplemented with EEIO or database estimates; moderate uncertainty |
| ⬤◯◯ Low | Limited primary literature; estimate derived primarily from EEIO or analogous categories; high uncertainty |
Low-confidence scores are still published — because a conservative estimate is more useful than silence — but are flagged prominently with a disclosure on the category page.
7. Provenance Override — Supplier Data Submission
The CCI is designed to be improved by verified real-world data. Suppliers, brands, and manufacturers can submit a Provenance Override request to update their product's score if they can provide verified documentation.
7.1 Accepted Evidence Types
| Evidence Type | Description | Score Impact |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 14067 PCF / EPD | Third-party verified product carbon footprint | Full override of default |
| Scope 1 + 2 Verification Report | Third-party verified facility-level S1/S2 data | Partial override (S1+S2 only) |
| Renewable Energy Certificate (REC / REGO) | Matched to production volume | S2 reduction |
| Recycled Content Certification | Third-party verified recycled input % | S3 reduction (material-specific) |
7.2 Process
- Supplier submits documentation via the enterprise app (Tier 2)
- Climate Cost reviews documentation for standard compliance
- If validated: product receives a Verified CCI Score displayed alongside the default
- Source documentation is linked publicly
- Independent expert reviews borderline submissions
Provenance Override does not remove the default CCI score from the wiki. Both scores are shown, labeled clearly.
8. Methodology Versioning
The CCI methodology is versioned using a MAJOR.MINOR system:
- MAJOR version changes: Material changes to scope, formula, or source hierarchy
- MINOR version changes: Source updates, new regional data, hotspot refinements
All historical versions are archived. Every category page displays the methodology version under which its score was calculated. When the methodology updates, category scores are flagged for review.
Current version: 1.1
8.1 Version History
| Version | Date | Status | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | April 2026 | Current | Display rounding changed from nearest to ceiling (round-up) to avoid undercounting. Tiered formatting: integers above 10, 1 decimal 1–9.99, 2 decimals below 1. No underlying data changes. |
| 1.0 | April 2026 | Superseded | Initial public methodology. 30 categories, 5 concept pages, 10 product deep dives. Conservative-first scoring, 8-tier source hierarchy, Scope 1/2/3 decomposition. |
| 2.0 | TBD | Planned | Independent expert validation of emission factors, formula calibration, confidence rating adjustments. Peer review of worked examples. |
| 1.2 | TBD | Planned | Source update cycle: incorporate 2025 IEA grid factors, new EPD data, community-submitted corrections. Add regional variation modules. |
9. What the CCI Does Not Cover
To be explicit about scope limitations:
- Use-phase emissions (energy consumed while using a product) — not included in default CCI scores
- End-of-life emissions (landfill, incineration, recycling) — not included by default; noted where significant
- Carbon offsets — not factored into any score; offsets do not reduce embodied carbon
- Logistics / last-mile delivery — not included in default; available as an add-on module for enterprise users
- Biogenic carbon — treated as zero at point of use per PAS 2050 default; disclosed where relevant
10. Governance & Review
Maintained by: Climate Cost (climatecost.org)
Review cycle: Annual full methodology review; ad hoc updates when major new data sources are published
Community feedback: Flagging and feedback available on every category page (enterprise users) and via public GitHub issues
The full methodology, including version history, is published at climatecost.org/methodology and in the public GitHub repository.
11. Citation
To cite the Climate Cost Index methodology:
Climate Cost. (2026). Climate Cost Index (CCI) Methodology, Version 1.1. climatecost.org/methodology