Beer Glass (glass)

Food & Beverage
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

67 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

134 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 10.1 15%
Scope 2 16.8 25%
Scope 3 40.2 60%
Total 67.1 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
Glass container production S3 45%
Raw material extraction and processing (silica, soda ash, limestone) S3 25%
Furnace energy consumption (natural gas) S1 18%
Transportation and distribution S3 12%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China, Germany, Italy
Grid Intensity
543 kgCO2e/MWh (China national average, IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

A standard beer glass bottle weighing approximately 500 grams consists of the following materials:

The relatively low recycled content assumption reflects global average conditions where many regions lack comprehensive glass collection and processing systems.

Manufacturing Geography

Glass bottle production occurs predominantly in China, Germany, and Italy, which collectively represent the largest centers of commercial glass container manufacturing. China dominates global production volume due to extensive industrial infrastructure and lower energy costs, while European facilities in Germany and Italy serve regional markets with higher recycled content integration.

The manufacturing process requires intensive thermal energy for furnace operations, typically reaching temperatures of 1500-1600°C. Chinese facilities predominantly rely on coal-fired electricity generation, resulting in higher carbon intensity compared to European operations that increasingly utilize renewable energy sources and established circular economy practices.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China543 kgCO2e/MWh67Baseline
Germany366 kgCO2e/MWh58-13%
Italy257 kgCO2e/MWh51-24%
India708 kgCO2e/MWh78+16%
United States386 kgCO2e/MWh60-10%

Provenance Override Guidance

Suppliers can submit the following data types to override the default emissions score:

  1. Verified recycled glass content percentage with third-party certification demonstrating actual cullet utilization rates in production
  2. Manufacturing facility energy source documentation including renewable electricity procurement agreements and natural gas consumption data
  3. Transportation distance and mode specifications from raw material suppliers to manufacturing facility and from facility to packaging location
  4. Detailed material composition analysis showing exact proportions of silica, soda ash, limestone, and any alternative raw materials used
  5. Glass furnace efficiency ratings and thermal energy consumption per unit output with supporting operational data

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Cimini & Moresi 2016 Journal of Cleaner Production — Found that glass bottle production represents approximately 30% of total beer production carbon footprint.
  2. Amienyo & Azapagic 2016 International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment — Demonstrated that packaging components represent 85-95% of total environmental impacts in beer production systems.
  3. Morgan et al. 2021 Sustainable Production and Consumption — Showed that increasing recycled glass content from 65% to 100% can reduce carbon footprint by 10-15%.
  4. MDPI 2024 Life Cycle Assessment in Beer Production: Systematic Review — Confirmed that returnable glass bottles achieve 12.5 times lower carbon footprint compared to non-returnable alternatives.
  5. De Marco et al. 2016 Journal of Industrial Ecology — Established that glass recycling saves 20-30% energy and 50% CO2 emissions versus virgin material production.
Scan a product in this category →