Beverages — Aluminum Can (330ml)
BeveragesCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.01 | 6% | |
| Scope 2 | 0.09 | 53% | |
| Scope 3 | 0.07 | 41% | |
| Total | 0.17 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Primary aluminum smelting (electrolysis) | S2 | 52% |
| Rolling and can body forming | S3 | 20% |
| Lacquer coating (internal and external) | S3 | 12% |
| Outbound transport and distribution | S3 | 10% |
| Can end and tab fabrication | S3 | 6% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- Global (China, Middle East, EU primary)
- Grid Intensity
- Mixed — China ~565 gCO2e/kWh, Middle East ~700 gCO2e/kWh, EU ~300 gCO2e/kWh
Material Composition Assumptions
The default bill of materials for a standard 330ml aluminum beverage can (approximately 14–15 g total) includes:
- Can body (DWI — drawn and wall-ironed): 3004 aluminum alloy, approximately 10–11 g. Formed from thin rolled sheet (0.09–0.11 mm wall gauge after ironing).
- Can end: 5182 aluminum alloy, approximately 2.5–3 g. Higher magnesium content for stiffness.
- Pull tab (stay-on-tab): 5182 alloy, approximately 0.4 g.
- Internal lacquer: Epoxy or acrylic coating, approximately 0.1 g — prevents metal–product interaction.
- External decoration: Ink and varnish, approximately 0.1 g.
The can is one of the lightest rigid beverage containers by mass (~15 g vs. ~200–330 g for glass), but aluminum is an extremely energy-intensive material to produce from bauxite ore. Primary aluminum smelting via the Hall–Héroult electrolysis process consumes approximately 13–15 kWh of electricity per kg of metal produced — among the highest electricity intensities of any commodity material.
Recycled content is the dominant variable. The global average recycled content in beverage cans is approximately 60–70% (EU ~75%, USA ~73%, global average ~63%). At 65% recycled content, the effective emission factor for can stock is approximately 4–6 kgCO2e/kg vs. ~18–20 kgCO2e/kg for 100% primary aluminium. This accounts for why the per-unit score (0.17 kgCO2e) is relatively low despite the high per-kg intensity.
Manufacturing Geography
The default manufacturing region is mixed global, with primary aluminum smelting concentrated in China, the Middle East (Gulf states), and to a lesser extent the EU and Canada.
- China: Produces ~57% of global primary aluminium. Grid intensity ~565 gCO2e/kWh, predominantly coal-fired. Chinese smelters are generally the most carbon-intensive globally.
- Middle East (UAE, Bahrain, Qatar): ~700 gCO2e/kWh grid; gas-fired captive power plants. Lower than coal-fired China but still high.
- EU (Norway, Iceland): Hydropower-dominant smelting at ~20–50 gCO2e/kWh. Produces some of the lowest-carbon primary aluminium globally.
- Canada: Hydro-dominated smelting at ~30–60 gCO2e/kWh.
Can forming (rolling mills, DWI lines) is more geographically distributed, often co-located with beverage filling plants. Secondary aluminium remelting (recycled content) is significantly less energy-intensive (~5% of primary smelting energy) and occurs regionally.
The default score uses a blended global average reflecting the ~65% recycled content mix and a weighted grid intensity across smelting regions.
Regional Variation
| Region | Primary Al Grid | Estimated Score Adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| EU (hydro-heavy, 75% recycled) | ~50 gCO2e/kWh | -40% total (saves ~0.07 kgCO2e) |
| USA (73% recycled) | ~390 gCO2e/kWh | -10% total (saves ~0.02 kgCO2e) |
| China (60% recycled, coal grid) | ~565 gCO2e/kWh | +25% total (adds ~0.04 kgCO2e) |
| 100% primary aluminium (coal grid) | ~700 gCO2e/kWh | +150% total (adds ~0.26 kgCO2e) |
| 100% recycled aluminium (renewable) | ~30 gCO2e/kWh | -70% total (saves ~0.12 kgCO2e) |
Note: The recycled content rate has a far larger impact on total emissions than grid intensity alone, because smelting electricity consumption per kg drops by ~95% when switching from primary to secondary production. Increasing recycled content from 65% to 85% saves approximately 0.05 kgCO2e per can — roughly equivalent to the current total footprint.
Provenance Override Guidance
A supplier or manufacturer may override the default CCI score by submitting:
- Recycled content certification from a recognised aluminium recycling scheme (e.g., ASI Recycled Content Standard, ISO 14021 self-declaration with audit, or chain-of-custody certificate from a scrap processor).
- Smelter-specific emission factor from an IAI-verified primary smelter, or a secondary smelter’s verified energy and emission data.
- Rolling mill energy data including electricity consumption per tonne of can sheet and any renewable energy certificates (RECs) or power purchase agreements (PPAs) in place.
- Product Environmental Declaration (EPD) per ISO 14025 covering the specific can format and production region.
- Conversion efficiency data from the DWI can-forming line (scrap rate affects material efficiency and therefore upstream emissions).
Can manufacturers Ball Corporation, Ardagh, and Novelis all publish sustainability reports with product-level carbon data that can serve as validated override sources.
Methodology Notes
- CCI score of 0.17 kgCO2e represents a global-average estimate at ~65% recycled content. This is broadly consistent with published industry LCA data from Ball Corporation and European Aluminium.
- Scope breakdown: Scope 2 (smelting electricity for the primary aluminium fraction) dominates at ~53% (0.09 kgCO2e). Scope 3 (rolling, forming, coating, logistics) accounts for ~41% (0.07 kgCO2e). Scope 1 (direct fuel combustion at forming facilities) is minimal at ~6% (0.01 kgCO2e).
- Functional unit: One 330ml non-returnable aluminum beverage can, cradle-to-gate (manufacturing only; filling, distribution, and end-of-life excluded unless stated).
- High confidence rating reflects the availability of multiple independent certified LCA studies and industry-level EPD data. The primary uncertainty is recycled content rate, which is well-characterised at the regional level.
- Per-kg vs. per-unit: The per-kg score of 11.5 kgCO2e/kg is high relative to other packaging materials, reflecting aluminum’s energy-intensive production. However, the low unit mass (~15 g per can) means the per-unit score is competitive with alternatives.
- End-of-life: Aluminum is infinitely recyclable with minimal quality loss. High collection and recycling rates (especially in deposit-return markets) are a key part of the system-level environmental case for aluminum packaging, though end-of-life credits are excluded from the CCI score.
Related Concepts
Related Categories
Sources
- Ball Corporation — Ball Corporation 2023 Sustainability Report. Reports lifecycle footprint for aluminum beverage cans, including recycled content sensitivity analysis.
- European Aluminium — Environmental Profile Report — Aluminium in Packaging, 2022. Average cradle-to-gate footprint of 1.7–2.3 kgCO2e per kg for rolled aluminum sheet at 60–70% recycled content.
- International Aluminium Institute (IAI) — Global Life Cycle Inventory Data for Aluminium Production 2021. Provides primary vs. secondary aluminium emission factors by smelting region.
- Ecoinvent v3.9 — Aluminium alloy production datasets (wrought alloy, can stock). Covers primary smelting, alloying, and can forming with regional variants.
- IEA — Emissions Factors 2024. Used for regional Scope 2 calculations at smelting and rolling facilities.
- The Aluminum Association — The Aluminum Can Advantage: Life Cycle Assessment, 2021. Industry-funded LCA covering material efficiency and recycling system performance.