Ceramic Casserole Dish
KitchenCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 3.25 | 5% | |
| Scope 2 | 32.5 | 50% | |
| Scope 3 | 29.25 | 45% | |
| Total | 65 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| kiln firing process (LPG combustion) | S1 | 48% |
| biscuit and glost firing | S1 | 26% |
| raw material extraction and processing | S3 | 20% |
| electricity consumption | S2 | 4% |
| transportation and packaging | S3 | 2% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China, Thailand, Portugal
- Grid Intensity
- 574 gCO2e/kWh (China national average, IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
The ceramic casserole dish contains approximately 1,200 grams of material composed primarily of kaolin clay (40%, 480g), feldspar (30%, 360g), and quartz (20%, 240g). Dolomite comprises an additional 8% (96g) of the base ceramic body. The remaining 2% (24g) consists of glazing compounds including calcium carbonate and barium carbonate that provide the finished surface coating. This material combination creates the durable ceramic structure capable of withstanding high-temperature cooking applications while maintaining thermal stability.
Manufacturing Geography
Ceramic casserole dish production concentrates in China, Thailand, and Portugal due to abundant clay deposits and established ceramic manufacturing infrastructure. China dominates global production with an electricity grid intensity of 574 gCO2e/kWh, significantly influencing the carbon footprint of electric-powered manufacturing processes. Thailand serves as a major exporter to international markets, while Portugal represents European production centers. The high-temperature firing requirements make energy availability and cost critical factors in manufacturing location decisions.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 574 gCO2e/kWh | 65 | Baseline |
| Thailand | 423 gCO2e/kWh | 58 | -11% lower |
| Portugal | 252 gCO2e/kWh | 48 | -26% lower |
| India | 708 gCO2e/kWh | 74 | +14% higher |
| Turkey | 492 gCO2e/kWh | 61 | -6% lower |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Kiln fuel type and consumption data including natural gas versus LPG usage rates and efficiency metrics for both biscuit and glost firing cycles.
-
Electricity consumption records for grinding, mixing, forming, and auxiliary processes with grid supplier renewable energy certificates if applicable.
-
Raw material sourcing documentation specifying clay body composition percentages, local versus imported material ratios, and supplier-specific extraction methods.
-
Manufacturing process specifications including kiln temperature profiles, firing duration cycles, and energy recovery systems implementation status.
-
Transportation logistics detailing shipping distances from raw material sources to manufacturing facilities and from production sites to distribution centers.
Methodology Notes
-
The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions for a standard 3-liter ceramic casserole dish weighing approximately 1.2 kilograms including glazing.
-
Scope 1 emissions capture direct fuel combustion during firing processes which dominate the carbon footprint due to high-temperature kiln requirements.
-
Scope 2 emissions reflect electricity consumption for mechanical processes including clay preparation, forming, and facility operations based on regional grid intensity.
-
Scope 3 emissions encompass raw material extraction, processing, and transportation with clay mining and mineral processing representing the largest upstream contributors.
-
The functional unit assumes standard household cooking applications with typical product lifespan expectations but excludes end-of-life disposal scenarios.
-
Data gaps exist around regional variations in kiln efficiency, renewable energy adoption rates at manufacturing facilities, and supplier-specific raw material processing methods.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Quinteiro et al. 2012 Journal of the European Ceramic Society — Established that manufacturing contributes the majority of lifecycle emissions for ceramic tableware products
- Chuenwong et al. 2017 Global warming potential assessment — Quantified Thai ceramic tableware emissions at 2.29-2.91 kg CO2eq/kg through comprehensive LCA analysis
- Pešta and Kočí 2023 Sustainability — Identified firing processes as the dominant energy hotspot representing 95% of total energy consumption
- Desole et al. 2023 International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology — Demonstrated that transportation contributes less than 1% of total lifecycle emissions for ceramic products
- Silvestri et al. 2020 Environmental impact assessment — Analyzed raw material contributions showing kaolin, feldspar, and quartz as primary emission sources