Cleaning Products — Industrial
Chemicals Low Confidence
Carbon Cost Index Score
2 kgCO₂e / per kg
Per kg
2 kgCO₂e / kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.2 | 10% | |
| Scope 2 | 0.2 | 10% | |
| Scope 3 | 1.6 | 80% | |
| Total | 2 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Surfactant and active ingredient production (petrochemical or oleochemical) | S3 | 40% |
| Solvent production (glycol ethers, IPA, d-limonene) | S3 | 20% |
| Packaging (HDPE drums, IBCs, plastic bottles) | S3 | 15% |
| Transport and distribution | S3 | 13% |
| Blending, quality testing, and filling | S2 | 12% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- USA, EU (Germany, UK), China
- Grid Intensity
- 390 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, USA)
Material Composition Assumptions
The default reference product is 1 kg of concentrated industrial cleaner/degreaser, representative of products used in manufacturing, food processing, and institutional settings:
- Active surfactants: Nonionic surfactants (alcohol ethoxylates) or anionic surfactants (LAS, SLS), approximately 10-25% of formulation weight. Derived from petrochemical (ethylene oxide) or oleochemical (palm kernel, coconut oil) feedstocks.
- Solvents: Glycol ethers, isopropanol, d-limonene, or butyl cellosolve, approximately 10-30% of formulation. Industrial grades are typically more concentrated than household equivalents.
- Builders and chelators: Sodium tripolyphosphate, EDTA, or citric acid, approximately 5-15%.
- Water: 30-60% of liquid formulations. Concentrated products minimize water content for transport efficiency.
- Packaging: HDPE drums (20-200L) or intermediate bulk containers (IBC, 1000L), or smaller HDPE bottles for janitorial use.
Industrial cleaning products are more concentrated than household products and are typically diluted before use. The per-kg emissions are therefore comparable to or slightly higher than household products, but the per-use emissions may be lower due to higher dilution ratios.
Manufacturing Geography
Industrial cleaning products are manufactured regionally:
- USA: Diversey, Ecolab, Zep. Major production near industrial customers.
- EU: Diversey (Netherlands), Werner & Mertz (Germany), Christeyns (Belgium).
- China: Growing domestic production, primarily for Asian markets.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Estimated Score (per kg) | Adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| USA (default) | 2.0 kgCO2e | Baseline |
| EU | 1.8 kgCO2e | -10% |
| China | 2.3 kgCO2e | +15% |
Provenance Override Guidance
- Product-level EPD or PCF per ISO 14025/14067.
- EU PEF data: The EU Product Environmental Footprint pilot for detergents and cleaners provides standardized methodology.
- Bio-based surfactant data: Oleochemical surfactants from certified sustainable palm kernel oil or coconut oil.
- Concentrated formulation data: Higher concentration reduces per-use and transport emissions.
Methodology Notes
- CCI score of 2 kgCO2e/kg is a conservative estimate for concentrated industrial cleaners. Based on EPA USEEIO sector data and Saouter et al. (2017) PEF methodology.
- Scope breakdown: Scope 3 at 80% (1.6 kgCO2e/kg) from surfactant, solvent, and packaging production. Scope 1 at 10% (0.2 kgCO2e/kg). Scope 2 at 10% (0.2 kgCO2e/kg).
- Confidence: Low — heterogeneous category with limited product-specific LCA data. USEEIO provides sector-level estimates but does not differentiate between industrial and household products.
- Functional unit: 1 kg of concentrated industrial cleaning product, cradle to gate.
- Use-phase: Excluded but significant for industrial cleaners — heated wash cycles, water treatment of effluent, and energy for spray/rinse systems can dominate lifecycle emissions.
Related Concepts
Related Categories
Sources
- EPA USEEIO (2020) — US Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Model v2.0. Sector 'Soap and cleaning compound manufacturing' (NAICS 325611/325612). Provides economy-wide emissions intensity benchmarks.
- Koehler & Wildbolz (2009) — Comparing the Environmental Footprints of Home-Care and Personal-Care Products: The Relevance of Different Life-Cycle Phases. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(22), 8643-8651.
- Saouter et al. (2017) — Environmental Footprint of cleaning products: methodological developments. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22, 1441-1458. Framework for EU PEF pilot on detergents and cleaning products.
- GHG Protocol (2014) — Scope 3 Calculation Guidance. Emission factors for chemical products.
- IEA (2024) — Emissions Factors 2024. Grid intensities for major chemical manufacturing countries.