Cotton T-Shirt

Apparel
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

48 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

180 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 2.4 5%
Scope 2 7.2 15%
Scope 3 38.4 80%
Total 48 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
consumer use (washing/drying) S3 45%
cotton cultivation and pesticide/fertilizer use S3 20%
yarn manufacturing and textile processing S3 18%
transportation and logistics S3 10%
fabric dyeing and bleaching S3 7%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
South Asia
Grid Intensity
632 kgCO2/MWh (India grid average, IEA 2024)

Material Composition Assumptions

A typical cotton t-shirt contains primarily cotton fiber representing the overwhelming majority of material mass. The standard composition includes cotton fabric at approximately 260 grams comprising 97% of total weight, with minor components including thread, labels, and potential trim elements totaling roughly 7 grams or 3% of the garment weight. The total assumed weight for this assessment is 267 grams per unit, reflecting industry-standard basic t-shirt construction without significant embellishments or heavy-weight fabric variations.

Manufacturing Geography

Primary manufacturing occurs throughout South Asia, particularly in India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, where established textile infrastructure supports large-scale cotton processing and garment assembly. These regions benefit from proximity to major cotton growing areas while maintaining cost-effective manufacturing capabilities. The grid intensity in this region averages 632 kgCO2/MWh based on India’s energy mix, reflecting the continued reliance on coal-fired power generation that significantly influences the carbon footprint of energy-intensive textile manufacturing processes.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
India632 kgCO2/MWh48Baseline
Vietnam465 kgCO2/MWh32-33%
China555 kgCO2/MWh42-13%
Turkey387 kgCO2/MWh29-40%
Mexico435 kgCO2/MWh31-35%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Cotton cultivation method documentation specifying organic versus conventional growing practices with third-party certification records
  2. Manufacturing facility energy consumption data including renewable energy usage percentages and local grid intensity measurements
  3. Transportation logistics documentation covering shipping distances and modal splits from cotton farm through final assembly
  4. Textile processing chemical usage records detailing dyeing, bleaching, and finishing processes with associated energy consumption
  5. Garment weight specifications and material composition breakdowns including any synthetic fiber blends or alternative materials

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Carbon Trust 2011 Carbon Footprint Study — Established baseline carbon footprint methodology for textile products including consumer use phase impacts.
  2. Cotton Incorporated 2016 Global LCA — Comprehensive analysis of cotton production environmental impacts across global growing regions.
  3. Daystar et al. 2019 Journal of Industrial Ecology — Quantified water consumption requirements of approximately 2,700 liters per cotton t-shirt.
  4. Liu et al. 2024 International Journal of Global Warming — Updated carbon footprint analysis showing regional manufacturing variations up to 1.5x between countries.
  5. Carbonfact 2025 Product Carbon Footprint Database — Current industry data on cotton t-shirt emissions ranging from 4.3 to 15 kg CO2e per unit.
  6. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 2023 Cotton Environmental Impacts — Analysis of pesticide intensity in cotton cultivation representing 16% of global insecticide use.
  7. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020 Cotton LCA Study — Identified consumer washing and drying as the dominant lifecycle emission source at 40-70%.
  8. Baydar et al. 2015 Resources Conservation & Recycling — Demonstrated 94% emissions reduction potential for organic versus conventional cotton production.
Scan a product in this category →