Deodorant Stick (plastic)
Personal CareCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 5 | 8% | |
| Scope 2 | 7.4 | 12% | |
| Scope 3 | 49.6 | 80% | |
| Total | 62 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| plastic container manufacturing | S3 | 45% |
| raw material extraction and refining | S3 | 20% |
| transportation and logistics | S3 | 18% |
| product formulation (fragrance & active ingredients) | S3 | 12% |
| end-of-life waste management | S3 | 5% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China, Southeast Asia
- Grid Intensity
- 540 gCO2/kWh (China national average, IEA 2024)
Material Composition Assumptions
A typical plastic deodorant stick weighs approximately 40 grams and consists of several key components. The primary plastic container comprises 25 grams of polypropylene or polyethylene terephthalate, representing roughly 62% of the total product weight. The deodorant formulation accounts for 12 grams, including active odor-control ingredients and fragrance compounds that make up 30% of the product. Secondary packaging materials such as cardboard sleeves contribute 2 grams or 5% of the total weight. Some formulations incorporate small amounts of aluminum-based antiperspirant compounds, while an increasing number of products utilize post-consumer recycled plastic content to reduce virgin material requirements. The remaining weight consists of miscellaneous components including labels, adhesives, and protective caps.
Manufacturing Geography
The majority of plastic deodorant sticks are manufactured in China and Southeast Asian countries, where large-scale personal care production facilities benefit from established supply chains and cost efficiencies. These regions host major contract manufacturers that produce private label and branded deodorants for global distribution. The manufacturing process relies heavily on electricity for plastic molding, product filling, and packaging operations. China’s grid intensity of 540 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour significantly influences the carbon footprint of products manufactured in this region. The concentration of petrochemical facilities and plastic resin suppliers in these areas further reinforces the geographic clustering of deodorant production.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 540 gCO2/kWh | 62 | Baseline |
| United States | 385 gCO2/kWh | 55 | -11% |
| European Union | 270 gCO2/kWh | 48 | -23% |
| India | 650 gCO2/kWh | 68 | +10% |
| Brazil | 85 gCO2/kWh | 38 | -39% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Plastic resin supplier documentation showing the percentage of post-consumer recycled content and associated carbon footprint data for container materials.
-
Energy consumption records from the manufacturing facility including renewable energy certificates and grid electricity usage during production periods.
-
Transportation manifests detailing shipping distances and modes of transport from raw material suppliers to manufacturing facilities and distribution centers.
-
Formulation specifications identifying the carbon intensity of active ingredients and fragrance compounds used in the deodorant stick.
-
End-of-life treatment data demonstrating actual recycling rates and waste processing methods for the specific plastic container design.
Methodology Notes
-
The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions for one complete deodorant stick including primary packaging but excluding retail packaging and consumer use phase impacts.
-
Scope 3 emissions dominate the footprint due to upstream plastic production and raw material processing, while direct manufacturing emissions remain relatively low.
-
The functional unit is defined as one standard-sized deodorant stick containing approximately 40 grams of product and packaging materials.
-
Consumer transportation to retail locations and product application behaviors are excluded from the assessment boundary.
-
Limited availability of supplier-specific data for fragrance compounds and specialty ingredients creates uncertainty in formulation-related emissions.
-
Regional grid intensity variations significantly affect the carbon footprint, with renewable energy-intensive regions showing substantially lower scores.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Rebel Care 2025 Blog — Analyzed the environmental impact of conventional versus sustainable personal care packaging materials.
- Wild Environmental Policy 2025 — Documented the carbon footprint reduction potential of refillable deodorant systems compared to single-use containers.
- ScienceDirect 2025 Journal Article - Plastics Production — Quantified greenhouse gas emissions from virgin plastic manufacturing processes across different production regions.
- Tom's of Maine 2025 Blog — Examined the role of packaging materials in determining the overall environmental footprint of personal care products.
- Earth Conscious 2024 Blog — Investigated the long-term environmental persistence of plastic containers in waste management systems.
- Natural Deodorant Industry Review 2023-2025 — Provided comprehensive analysis of material composition and manufacturing practices across major deodorant brands.