Dish Soap (500ml)

Kitchen
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

38 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

76 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 1.9 5%
Scope 2 3.8 10%
Scope 3 32.3 85%
Total 38 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
surfactant production (fatty alcohol sulfate) S3 45%
product use phase - water heating S3 35%
manufacturing energy S1 12%
PET/HDPE packaging S3 6%
transportation & distribution S3 2%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

This assessment assumes a typical 500ml liquid dish soap product weighing approximately 500 grams. The formulation consists of sodium lauryl sulfate or sodium laureth sulfate serving as the primary surfactant component, representing roughly 15-20% of the total weight. Water forms the bulk carrier medium at approximately 70-75% by weight. Sodium chloride acts as a viscosity modifier at 2-3% concentration. Fragrance compounds, preservatives like methylisothiazolinone, and synthetic dyes such as Blue 1 or Yellow 5 collectively comprise less than 2% of the formulation. The container utilizes either PET or HDPE plastic construction weighing approximately 25-30 grams, representing 5-6% of the total product weight.

Manufacturing Geography

Global dish soap production concentrates primarily in China, which accounts for the largest share of international detergent manufacturing capacity. Chinese facilities benefit from established petrochemical supply chains that provide surfactant precursors and integrated manufacturing infrastructure. The electrical grid intensity averages 555 gCO2/kWh, reflecting the country’s continued reliance on coal-fired power generation for industrial operations. Manufacturing energy requirements include chemical processing equipment, mixing systems, and packaging line operations that collectively drive the direct emissions profile.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2/kWh38Baseline
Germany366 gCO2/kWh35-8%
United States386 gCO2/kWh36-5%
India708 gCO2/kWh42+11%
France57 gCO2/kWh28-26%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit detailed surfactant sourcing documentation specifying whether fatty alcohol sulfates derive from petroleum or renewable feedstocks, including supplier-specific production emission factors.

  2. Provide manufacturing facility energy consumption data with actual electricity source breakdown and any renewable energy procurement agreements that reduce grid dependency.

  3. Supply packaging specifications detailing recycled content percentages for plastic containers and alternative packaging materials that may reduce upstream emissions.

  4. Document transportation logistics including shipping distances, modal splits between ocean freight and trucking, and distribution center locations to refine supply chain emissions.

  5. Furnish product formulation details highlighting any bio-based surfactant alternatives or concentrated formulations that alter the typical emission intensity assumptions.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. van Lieshout et al. 2015 CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering — Identified surfactant production as the dominant environmental hotspot in liquid detergent manufacturing.
  2. Golsteijn & Huijbregts 2016 Environmental Sciences Europe — Demonstrated that product formulation drives the majority of climate impact in dish soap life cycle assessment.
  3. Kapur et al. 2021 Science of the Total Environment — Found petroleum-based detergents show ten times higher impacts than biodegradable alternatives in certain environmental categories.
  4. University of Colorado LCA Study 2015 — Revealed that packaging comprises only 2% of total environmental impact for liquid dish soap products.
Scan a product in this category →