Disposable Razor (pack of 5)

Personal Care
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

48 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

1,920 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 2.4 5%
Scope 2 7.2 15%
Scope 3 38.4 80%
Total 48 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
plastic material production S3 35%
steel blade manufacturing S3 25%
international transportation & distribution S3 15%
end-of-life landfill disposal S3 13%
factory energy consumption S2 12%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
France, United States, Brazil
Grid Intensity
0.416 kgCO2e/kWh (France, 2023 IEA)

Material Composition Assumptions

A typical five-pack of disposable razors contains multiple material components that contribute to its overall carbon footprint. The plastic handles constructed from polypropylene or polycarbonate comprise approximately 15 grams per razor, representing roughly 60% of each unit’s total weight. Stainless steel blades account for approximately 3 grams per razor, constituting about 12% of the material mass but carrying significant embodied carbon due to energy-intensive steel production processes.

Additional components include rubber grip sections weighing approximately 2 grams per unit, moisture strips made from polyethylene adding another gram per razor, and packaging materials consisting of cardboard backing and plastic outer wrapping totaling approximately 4 grams per five-pack. The complete package weighs approximately 125 grams, with plastic materials representing the largest portion by mass followed by steel components.

Manufacturing Geography

Primary manufacturing occurs across three major regions where leading disposable razor producers operate large-scale facilities. French production facilities benefit from relatively low-carbon electricity grids dominated by nuclear power generation, resulting in reduced manufacturing emissions compared to fossil fuel-dependent regions. United States manufacturing relies on regional grid electricity with varying carbon intensities depending on facility location, while Brazilian operations utilize a mix of hydroelectric and fossil fuel-powered electricity.

The multi-regional production strategy reflects market proximity considerations and labor cost optimization, with each facility serving specific geographic markets to minimize transportation distances. French facilities primarily serve European markets, while American and Brazilian plants supply North and South American regions respectively.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
France0.416 kgCO2e/kWh42-12.5%
United States (average)0.855 kgCO2e/kWh480%
Brazil0.745 kgCO2e/kWh45-6.3%
China (hypothetical)1.02 kgCO2e/kWh54+12.5%
Germany0.485 kgCO2e/kWh43-10.4%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Factory-specific electricity consumption data measured in kWh per thousand units produced, including documentation of renewable energy procurement agreements or on-site generation facilities.

  2. Detailed material sourcing documentation specifying plastic resin suppliers, steel grade specifications, and transportation distances from raw material suppliers to manufacturing facilities.

  3. Production efficiency metrics including waste rates, energy recovery systems, and manufacturing yield percentages that demonstrate optimized resource utilization.

  4. Transportation and logistics data covering shipping methods, distances, and consolidation factors from manufacturing facilities to regional distribution centers.

  5. End-of-life management programs including take-back initiatives, recycling partnerships, or alternative disposal methods that reduce landfill burden.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. BIC Ecolutions 2010 Slate Magazine — Manufacturing emissions analysis showed each disposable razor unit generates 43 grams of CO2 during production processes.
  2. Ethical Unicorn 2025 LCA Analysis — Life cycle assessment revealed that plastic and steel components dominate the environmental impact profile of disposable shaving products.
  3. Design Life-Cycle 2016 BIC Manufacturing — Production facility analysis documented energy consumption patterns and material flows in disposable razor manufacturing operations.
  4. LeafScore 2024 Environmental Impact — Comprehensive environmental review identified recycling challenges due to mixed material composition in disposable razor construction.
  5. EcoWatch 2021 Razor Analysis — Market analysis found that Americans dispose of approximately 2 billion disposable razors annually, creating significant waste streams.
Scan a product in this category →