Interior Wooden Door

Building Materials
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

42 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

2.1 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 2.1 5%
Scope 2 8.4 20%
Scope 3 31.5 75%
Total 42 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
particleboard manufacturing and urea formaldehyde resin S3 38%
raw material extraction and transportation S3 30%
product distribution and shipping S3 18%
end-of-life disposal and landfilling S3 10%
manufacturing energy consumption S1 4%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

The default interior wooden door model assumes a composite construction weighing approximately 20 kilograms. The door core consists primarily of particleboard or medium-density fiberboard (12 kg, 60%), bound together with urea formaldehyde adhesive (0.8 kg, 4%). The structural frame uses solid wood veneer or sawn lumber (4 kg, 20%), while laminated veneer lumber provides additional reinforcement (1.5 kg, 7.5%). Surface treatments include decorative paper or PVC coating (0.9 kg, 4.5%) and protective wood stain or polyurethane finish (0.8 kg, 4%).

Manufacturing Geography

Interior wooden doors are primarily manufactured in China, which accounts for the largest share of global production due to established wood processing infrastructure and access to both domestic and imported timber resources. The manufacturing region uses an electricity grid with carbon intensity of 555 gCO2/kWh, reflecting China’s coal-heavy energy mix. This grid intensity significantly influences the carbon footprint of energy-intensive processes like particleboard manufacturing and adhesive production, though the overall manufacturing stage represents a relatively small portion of total emissions.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2/kWh42Baseline
Canada120 gCO2/kWh36-14% (hydroelectric power)
Germany310 gCO2/kWh39-7% (mixed renewables)
Poland640 gCO2/kWh44+5% (coal-heavy grid)
Brazil85 gCO2/kWh34-19% (hydroelectric dominance)

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit detailed material composition data showing actual percentages of solid wood versus engineered wood products, including specific adhesive types and quantities used in core construction.

  2. Provide transportation distance documentation for raw timber sourcing, including whether wood originates from local forests or requires international shipping from distant suppliers.

  3. Supply manufacturing facility energy consumption records with specific electricity grid mix data or renewable energy certificates that demonstrate lower-carbon power sources.

  4. Document adhesive formulation specifications, particularly for formaldehyde-free alternatives or bio-based binding agents that reduce chemical processing impacts.

  5. Furnish end-of-life management plans showing recycling partnerships or waste-to-energy arrangements that avoid landfill disposal of wood components.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Cobut et al. 2015 Journal of Cleaner Production — Identified raw material acquisition and transportation as the dominant carbon footprint contributors for wooden building products.
  2. Wenker 2016 Life Cycle Assessment of Wooden Interior Doors — Demonstrated that manufacturing stage emissions are relatively small compared to upstream material impacts.
  3. Lao et al. 2023 Science of The Total Environment — Found that wooden doors have dramatically lower environmental impacts than steel alternatives across multiple impact categories.
  4. Knight et al. 2005 Wood and Fiber Science — Established that solid wood products can achieve negative carbon footprints when biogenic carbon storage is properly accounted.
Scan a product in this category →