EV Battery Pack (75 kWh)
AutomotiveCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 5 | 8% | |
| Scope 2 | 11 | 18% | |
| Scope 3 | 46 | 74% | |
| Total | 62 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| cathode & anode material production | S3 | 32% |
| mining & refining (lithium, cobalt, nickel) | S3 | 28% |
| cell manufacturing & electricity | S1/S2 | 22% |
| module assembly & testing | S1 | 12% |
| transportation & logistics | S3 | 6% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 555 kgCO2e/MWh (China national grid average, IEA 2024)
Material Composition Assumptions
A typical 75 kWh electric vehicle battery pack contains approximately 500 kilograms of materials. The composition includes lithium carbonate or hydroxide serving as precursors for anode active materials, representing roughly 8% of total weight. Nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide forms the primary cathode active material at approximately 180 kg or 36% of the pack weight. Graphite anodes contribute another 15% by mass, while lithium iron phosphate may substitute as an alternative cathode chemistry in some configurations.
The electrolyte system consists of lithium salts dissolved in organic solvents, accounting for about 10% of total weight. Polymer separator membranes comprise roughly 5% of the pack mass. Structural components include aluminum housing and terminals at approximately 20% of total weight, with copper and aluminum current collectors making up the remaining 6% of materials.
Manufacturing Geography
This assessment assumes manufacturing in China, which produces over 75% of global lithium-ion battery capacity. Chinese battery facilities typically operate on a national grid with an average carbon intensity of 555 kgCO2e/MWh according to International Energy Agency data. The concentration of battery manufacturing in China reflects established supply chains for raw material processing, cell production equipment, and integrated automotive manufacturing ecosystems.
Manufacturing in coal-dependent regions significantly elevates the carbon footprint of battery production, particularly during energy-intensive processes like electrode coating, cell formation, and module assembly. The high grid carbon intensity directly impacts Scope 2 emissions from facility electricity consumption.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China (default) | 555 kgCO2e/MWh | 62 | - |
| European Union | 270 kgCO2e/MWh | 48 | -23% |
| United States | 386 kgCO2e/MWh | 54 | -13% |
| South Korea | 436 kgCO2e/MWh | 58 | -6% |
| Nordic Region | 98 kgCO2e/MWh | 39 | -37% |
Provenance Override Guidance
Suppliers can submit the following data types to override the default CCI score:
- Facility-specific electricity consumption data with renewable energy certificates or power purchase agreements demonstrating clean energy sourcing
- Material supplier certifications documenting low-carbon mining and refining processes for lithium, cobalt, nickel, and manganese
- Transportation logistics data showing shipping distances and modal choices from raw material sources through final assembly
- Battery chemistry specifications with detailed cathode and anode material compositions and their respective carbon intensities
- Recycled content documentation quantifying the percentage of recovered materials used in new battery cell production
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions for a complete 75 kWh battery pack ready for vehicle integration
- Scope 3 emissions dominate at 74% due to upstream mining, refining, and material production processes
- Scope 2 emissions account for 18% reflecting electricity consumption during manufacturing and assembly
- The functional unit covers one complete battery pack capable of 75 kWh energy storage
- Vehicle integration, use phase, and end-of-life recycling are excluded from this assessment
- Regional grid carbon intensity variations can alter total emissions by 30-40% depending on manufacturing location
- Battery chemistry selection significantly influences the carbon footprint, with sodium-ion and lithium iron phosphate options showing lower emissions than nickel-rich formulations
- Data gaps remain in supplier-specific mining practices and emerging recycling technologies that could reduce future emissions
Related Concepts
Sources
- Messaggiero et al. 2020 Energies — Provided lifecycle emissions data for lithium-ion battery manufacturing processes.
- Motorwatt 2025 Blog — Documented current market trends in EV battery pack carbon footprints.
- Barnhart & Benson 2023 Scientific Reports — Analyzed regional variations in battery manufacturing emissions based on electricity grid composition.
- Emilsson & Dahllöf 2022 PMC/NCBI — Quantified emissions intensity ranges for different battery chemistries and production methods.
- Minviro & Cobalt Institute 2025 — Assessed mining and refining emissions for critical battery minerals including cobalt and nickel.
- International Energy Agency 2024 — Published grid carbon intensity data for major battery manufacturing regions.
- International Council on Clean Transportation 2018 — Established methodology frameworks for EV battery lifecycle assessments.
- Dai et al. 2023 ACS Environmental Science & Technology — Evaluated recycling benefits and second-life applications for reducing battery carbon footprints.
- Obideyi et al. 2024 MDPI — Compared emissions profiles across different battery chemistry options including sodium-ion alternatives.