EV Battery Pack (75 kWh)

Automotive
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

62 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

124 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 5 8%
Scope 2 11 18%
Scope 3 46 74%
Total 62 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
cathode & anode material production S3 32%
mining & refining (lithium, cobalt, nickel) S3 28%
cell manufacturing & electricity S1/S2 22%
module assembly & testing S1 12%
transportation & logistics S3 6%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 kgCO2e/MWh (China national grid average, IEA 2024)

Material Composition Assumptions

A typical 75 kWh electric vehicle battery pack contains approximately 500 kilograms of materials. The composition includes lithium carbonate or hydroxide serving as precursors for anode active materials, representing roughly 8% of total weight. Nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide forms the primary cathode active material at approximately 180 kg or 36% of the pack weight. Graphite anodes contribute another 15% by mass, while lithium iron phosphate may substitute as an alternative cathode chemistry in some configurations.

The electrolyte system consists of lithium salts dissolved in organic solvents, accounting for about 10% of total weight. Polymer separator membranes comprise roughly 5% of the pack mass. Structural components include aluminum housing and terminals at approximately 20% of total weight, with copper and aluminum current collectors making up the remaining 6% of materials.

Manufacturing Geography

This assessment assumes manufacturing in China, which produces over 75% of global lithium-ion battery capacity. Chinese battery facilities typically operate on a national grid with an average carbon intensity of 555 kgCO2e/MWh according to International Energy Agency data. The concentration of battery manufacturing in China reflects established supply chains for raw material processing, cell production equipment, and integrated automotive manufacturing ecosystems.

Manufacturing in coal-dependent regions significantly elevates the carbon footprint of battery production, particularly during energy-intensive processes like electrode coating, cell formation, and module assembly. The high grid carbon intensity directly impacts Scope 2 emissions from facility electricity consumption.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China (default)555 kgCO2e/MWh62-
European Union270 kgCO2e/MWh48-23%
United States386 kgCO2e/MWh54-13%
South Korea436 kgCO2e/MWh58-6%
Nordic Region98 kgCO2e/MWh39-37%

Provenance Override Guidance

Suppliers can submit the following data types to override the default CCI score:

  1. Facility-specific electricity consumption data with renewable energy certificates or power purchase agreements demonstrating clean energy sourcing
  2. Material supplier certifications documenting low-carbon mining and refining processes for lithium, cobalt, nickel, and manganese
  3. Transportation logistics data showing shipping distances and modal choices from raw material sources through final assembly
  4. Battery chemistry specifications with detailed cathode and anode material compositions and their respective carbon intensities
  5. Recycled content documentation quantifying the percentage of recovered materials used in new battery cell production

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Messaggiero et al. 2020 Energies — Provided lifecycle emissions data for lithium-ion battery manufacturing processes.
  2. Motorwatt 2025 Blog — Documented current market trends in EV battery pack carbon footprints.
  3. Barnhart & Benson 2023 Scientific Reports — Analyzed regional variations in battery manufacturing emissions based on electricity grid composition.
  4. Emilsson & Dahllöf 2022 PMC/NCBI — Quantified emissions intensity ranges for different battery chemistries and production methods.
  5. Minviro & Cobalt Institute 2025 — Assessed mining and refining emissions for critical battery minerals including cobalt and nickel.
  6. International Energy Agency 2024 — Published grid carbon intensity data for major battery manufacturing regions.
  7. International Council on Clean Transportation 2018 — Established methodology frameworks for EV battery lifecycle assessments.
  8. Dai et al. 2023 ACS Environmental Science & Technology — Evaluated recycling benefits and second-life applications for reducing battery carbon footprints.
  9. Obideyi et al. 2024 MDPI — Compared emissions profiles across different battery chemistry options including sodium-ion alternatives.
Scan a product in this category →