Wine Bottle (750ml Glass)
PackagingCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.35 | 39% | |
| Scope 2 | 0.18 | 20% | |
| Scope 3 | 0.37 | 41% | |
| Total | 0.9 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Glass melting furnace (natural gas combustion, regenerative end-port) | S1 | 32% |
| Raw batch materials (silica sand, soda ash, limestone, dolomite) | S3 | 30% |
| Forming and annealing (IS machine, lehr energy) | S2 | 16% |
| Outbound transport (pallet, truck, container shipping to winery) | S3 | 14% |
| Cullet handling and batch preparation | S3 | 8% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- Global (EU, China, USA)
- Grid Intensity
- 287 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, EU average); 565 gCO2e/kWh (China)
Product Profile
The 750ml wine bottle is the global standard unit for still and sparkling wine, with approximately 20 billion bottles produced annually. A standard Bordeaux-style bottle (the most common shape) weighs 400–550g depending on wine type and regional convention — premium wines and Champagne bottles often exceed 900g. This profile uses a 400g reference weight representing a modern lightweight design.
At 0.9 kgCO2e per bottle, glass packaging sits at the heavier end of single-serve beverage containers. Aluminum cans (approximately 0.17 kgCO2e for a 330ml can) and PET bottles (0.06–0.12 kgCO2e) carry significantly lower per-unit footprints — though glass’s recyclability, taste neutrality, and consumer perception make it the dominant format for wine globally.
Why the Score Is What It Is
Glass manufacturing is fundamentally an energy-intensive melting process, and the carbon profile reflects that:
- The furnace is the dominant emission source. Glass melting requires sustained temperatures of 1,450–1,600°C. In EU glassworks, this heat is predominantly supplied by natural gas combustion in regenerative furnaces, which recover waste heat but still emit ~0.25–0.35 kgCO2/kg of glass as direct Scope 1 emissions.
- Batch chemistry contributes significant process CO2. The decomposition of soda ash (Na2CO3 → Na2O + CO2) during melting releases CO2 chemically, independent of energy source. Even a fully electrified furnace would still produce ~0.15–0.20 kgCO2e/kg from batch decomposition.
- Cullet (recycled glass) dramatically reduces both. Each 10% increase in cullet rate reduces melting energy by approximately 2.5% and eliminates the batch decomposition emissions for that fraction. EU average cullet rates (~76% for green glass, ~42% for flint/clear) are among the highest globally; US rates (~33%) and China rates (~20%) result in materially higher per-bottle footprints.
- Bottle weight is a primary lever. Moving from a 550g premium bottle to a 400g standard bottle reduces per-bottle emissions by roughly 27% proportionally.
Scope Breakdown Detail
| Scope | kgCO2e | % of Total | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.35 | 39% | Natural gas furnace combustion, batch decomposition CO2 |
| Scope 2 | 0.18 | 20% | Forming machines, annealing lehr, compressed air, IS machine |
| Scope 3 | 0.37 | 41% | Silica, soda ash, limestone supply; transport of batch materials and finished bottles |
| Total | 0.90 | 100% |
Scope 1’s elevated share (39%) is unusual relative to most manufactured goods and reflects glass manufacturing’s fundamental reliance on direct combustion for process heat. Electrification of furnaces — now commercially piloting at facilities in the EU — would shift this into Scope 2 and enable decarbonization via renewable electricity.
Geographic Sensitivity
Manufacturing location has a pronounced effect on Scope 2 emissions and modestly affects Scope 3 (transport of batch materials):
| Region | Approx. kgCO2e/bottle | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| EU (average) | 0.85–0.95 | High cullet rates, cleaner grid, efficient furnaces |
| USA | 1.0–1.2 | Lower cullet rate, mixed grid, older furnace stock |
| China | 1.1–1.4 | Low cullet rate, coal-heavy grid |
| EU (100% recycled glass) | 0.55–0.65 | Maximum cullet scenario |
Reduction Pathways
- Lightweighting: Each 10g reduction in bottle weight saves approximately 0.02 kgCO2e. Many wine regions have moved to 400g standard bottles from legacy 550g designs.
- Cullet maximization: Closed-loop glass collection (deposit systems) enables cullet rates above 90%, substantially cutting furnace energy and batch decomposition.
- Furnace electrification: Hybrid electric-gas and fully electric furnaces are now commercially available. On a renewable grid, this could reduce per-bottle emissions by 60–70%.
- Alternative formats: Bag-in-box wine (3L format) reduces packaging carbon per liter of wine by 80–90% compared to glass bottles.
Provenance Override
FEVE publishes verified EPDs for European container glass manufacturers including Ardagh, Verallia, and Owens-Illinois EU operations. These EPDs are ISO 14040/14044 compliant and verified by Bureau Veritas and SGS, and qualify as provenance overrides for EU-sourced glass. US and China sourcing lacks comparable public EPD coverage as of 2026.
Related Concepts
Sources
- FEVE (European Container Glass Federation) — EPD for Glass Containers, 2022. Cradle-to-gate: 0.55–0.65 kgCO2e/kg for EU average cullet mix (~42% recycled). FEVE EPD Program, EPD-FEVE-20220047-CBP1-EN.
- WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme) — Packaging data for glass bottles, 2021. Average UK wine bottle 420g; carbon intensity 0.82–1.1 kgCO2e/bottle cradle-to-gate including logistics.
- Ecoinvent Centre — Ecoinvent v3.9 'glass bottle production, white glass' and 'glass bottle production, green glass'. ~0.60–0.75 kgCO2e/kg depending on cullet rate and regional grid.
- IEA — Emissions Factors 2024. EU and China grid intensities used for Scope 2 furnace and forming electrical loads.