Foundation (30ml glass bottle)

Personal Care
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

52 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

867 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 7.8 15%
Scope 2 13 25%
Scope 3 31.2 60%
Total 52 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
raw material extraction and glass melting S1 35%
transportation and distribution (high weight) S3 28%
packaging material production S1 22%
end-of-life treatment (recycling/landfill) S3 15%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

The foundation bottle consists primarily of soda-lime silicate glass forming the main container structure, representing approximately 55 grams or 85% of total product weight. Mineral-based colorants may be incorporated during the melting process to achieve desired aesthetic properties, typically accounting for less than 1% by weight. The closure system utilizes either aluminum or plastic cap hardware weighing roughly 3 grams or 5% of the assembly. Secondary packaging includes a paperboard box weighing approximately 7 grams, representing the remaining 10% of total material content for protective and marketing purposes.

Manufacturing Geography

Glass bottle production concentrates heavily in China due to abundant silica sand resources, established manufacturing infrastructure, and proximity to major cosmetic brand supply chains. The region’s coal-dependent electricity grid operates at 555 gCO2/kWh, contributing substantially to the carbon intensity of energy-intensive glass melting operations. Chinese facilities benefit from economies of scale and integrated supply chains spanning raw material extraction through finished packaging assembly. Transportation distances to global cosmetic manufacturing hubs remain relatively short, partially offsetting the high grid intensity through reduced logistics emissions.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2/kWh52Baseline
Germany366 gCO2/kWh47-10%
United States386 gCO2/kWh48-8%
India708 gCO2/kWh58+12%
France57 gCO2/kWh38-27%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Furnace energy consumption data with specific fuel mix breakdown and thermal efficiency measurements for the glass melting facility
  2. Cullet content percentage documentation showing recycled glass input ratios and source material verification
  3. Transportation manifests detailing shipping distances, vehicle types, and fuel consumption from manufacturing to distribution centers
  4. End-of-life infrastructure documentation for target markets including recycling rates and collection system efficiency
  5. Raw material extraction data covering silica sand mining location, processing energy, and transportation to manufacturing facility

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Boutros et al. 2021 Comparative Packaging Assessment — Demonstrated that glass containers require significantly higher energy inputs during production compared to plastic alternatives.
  2. Simon et al. 2016 Journal of Environmental Management — Quantified the transportation impact penalty associated with glass packaging's superior weight characteristics.
  3. Ivanov & Hartmann 2016 South African Journal of Industrial Engineering — Analyzed the energy reduction benefits achievable through increased cullet content in glass manufacturing furnaces.
  4. Grisales et al. 2021 Life Cycle Assessment Study — Established reuse thresholds necessary for glass containers to achieve environmental parity with single-use plastic packaging.
  5. Tonini et al. 2021 Carbon Footprint Assessment — Evaluated the infinite recyclability potential of glass materials and associated energy savings versus virgin production.
  6. Meshalkin et al. 2022 Glass and Ceramics — Investigated manufacturing process optimization opportunities in high-temperature glass production systems.
  7. Uslu et al. 2019 Cosmetic Packaging LCA — Compared environmental performance across packaging material alternatives for cosmetic product applications.
Scan a product in this category →