Hair Brush (plastic/nylon)

Personal Care
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

38 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

380 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 3 8%
Scope 2 5.7 15%
Scope 3 29.3 77%
Total 38 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
nylon resin/fiber production S3 45%
plastic handle/material processing S3 20%
packaging materials S3 15%
transportation and distribution S3 12%
manufacturing facility operations S2 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2024)

Material Composition Assumptions

This assessment covers conventional hair brushes constructed primarily from synthetic materials. The bristle array consists of nylon fibers derived from polyamide polymers sourced from petroleum feedstocks, comprising approximately 15 grams or 15% of total product weight. The handle structure uses polypropylene or similar thermoplastic materials, representing roughly 75 grams or 75% of the brush mass. A cushioned base section incorporates rubber or flexible plastic compounds, contributing about 8 grams or 8% of weight. Minor metallic components such as ferrules or fasteners account for the remaining 2 grams or 2% of material composition, bringing total estimated weight to 100 grams per unit.

Manufacturing Geography

Hair brush production concentrates heavily in China, which processes the majority of global plastic personal care items through established petrochemical and manufacturing infrastructure. Chinese facilities benefit from integrated supply chains connecting nylon fiber producers with brush assembly operations, reducing transportation costs between production stages. The country’s electricity grid operates at an intensity of 555 gCO2/kWh according to International Energy Agency data, reflecting substantial reliance on coal-fired power generation. This carbon-intensive energy mix significantly elevates the manufacturing emissions profile compared to regions powered by renewable electricity sources.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2/kWh38Baseline
Germany366 gCO2/kWh34-11%
Costa Rica35 gCO2/kWh26-32%
India708 gCO2/kWh42+11%
Poland778 gCO2/kWh44+16%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit verified electricity consumption data and renewable energy certificates from the specific manufacturing facility where brush assembly occurs.

  2. Provide detailed material composition specifications including exact nylon grade, plastic resin types, and any recycled content percentages with third-party verification.

  3. Document transportation modes and distances for nylon fiber shipments from polymer production facilities to brush manufacturing locations.

  4. Supply energy intensity measurements for nylon polymerization processes if vertically integrated, including process heat and chemical reaction energy requirements.

  5. Present packaging material specifications with weight data and recycled content verification for primary and secondary packaging components.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Duane et al. 2020 British Dental Journal — Research documented the environmental impact pathways for plastic personal care products including bristle manufacturing.
  2. Springer Nature 2024 Manual Toothbrush LCA — Life cycle assessment revealed that bristle production dominates the carbon footprint of plastic grooming tools.
  3. Good On You 2025 Material Guide Nylon — Analysis showed nylon production releases nitrous oxide emissions significantly more potent than standard carbon dioxide.
  4. Carbon Trust 2023 Beauty Industry Emissions — Industry report identified material sourcing as the largest contributor to beauty and personal care product emissions.
  5. Lawrence Berkeley Lab 2019 Plastic Production — Study quantified the energy intensity and fossil fuel dependency of petroleum-based plastic manufacturing processes.
Scan a product in this category →