Hand Sanitizer (250ml)
Personal CareCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 1.6 | 5% | |
| Scope 2 | 2.6 | 8% | |
| Scope 3 | 27.8 | 87% | |
| Total | 32 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| active ingredient production (ethanol/isopropanol) | S3 | 72% |
| plastic bottle manufacturing (LDPE/PP/PET) | S3 | 12% |
| transportation and distribution | S3 | 8% |
| manufacturing electricity and natural gas | S2 | 5% |
| packaging (labels, carboard boxes) | S3 | 3% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 555 kgCO2e/MWh (IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
The Climate Cost Index assessment for a 250ml hand sanitizer assumes the following material composition based on standard WHO formulations:
- Active ingredient (ethanol at 60-80% or isopropanol at 75%): 188-200g representing 75-80% of total volume
- Distilled water as solvent: 45-50g comprising 18-20% of formulation
- Glycerol as humectant and emollient: 3.6g accounting for 1.45% of mixture
- Hydrogen peroxide as antimicrobial booster: 0.3g at 0.125% concentration
- Low-density polyethylene or polypropylene bottle: 15g for primary packaging
- Polypropylene pump dispenser or closure: 5g for dispensing mechanism
- Cardboard outer shipping box (allocated per unit): 2g for retail packaging
The total product weight including packaging reaches approximately 250-275g, with the active alcohol ingredient representing the dominant mass component and primary environmental impact driver.
Manufacturing Geography
Hand sanitizer production predominantly occurs in China, which accounts for the largest share of global personal care product manufacturing. Chinese facilities benefit from established chemical processing infrastructure and proximity to raw material suppliers for both alcohol production and plastic packaging components.
The manufacturing region assessment uses China’s national grid intensity of 555 kgCO2e/MWh, reflecting the country’s coal-dominated electricity generation mix. This grid intensity significantly influences the carbon footprint of energy-intensive processes including alcohol distillation and plastic bottle production through injection molding.
Regional concentration in China also stems from integrated supply chains where alcohol production, plastic manufacturing, and final assembly occur within the same industrial zones, reducing transportation emissions between production stages.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 555 kgCO2e/MWh | 32 | Baseline |
| India | 708 kgCO2e/MWh | 36 | +12.5% |
| United States | 386 kgCO2e/MWh | 28 | -12.5% |
| Germany | 338 kgCO2e/MWh | 26 | -18.8% |
| Brazil | 75 kgCO2e/MWh | 20 | -37.5% |
Provenance Override Guidance
Suppliers can submit the following data types to override the default CCI score with product-specific information:
-
Active ingredient production data including alcohol source (petroleum-derived vs bio-based ethanol), production facility location, and energy consumption per kilogram of alcohol produced.
-
Plastic bottle manufacturing specifications detailing resin type, recycled content percentage, bottle weight, and production facility grid intensity with supporting electricity consumption data.
-
Transportation logistics documentation covering shipping distances from alcohol production to formulation facility, formulation facility to packaging site, and final distribution to regional markets.
-
Energy consumption records from the formulation and filling process including electricity usage for mixing equipment, filling lines, and facility operations with corresponding grid emission factors.
-
Packaging material specifications encompassing label materials, adhesives, pump dispenser components, and outer carton specifications with supplier location data.
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions including raw material extraction, manufacturing, and packaging but excluding use phase and end-of-life disposal.
- Scope 3 emissions dominate at 87% primarily due to upstream alcohol production and plastic manufacturing, while Scope 2 contributes 8% from manufacturing electricity consumption.
- The functional unit covers one 250ml hand sanitizer bottle as typically sold in retail channels.
- Excluded elements include retail storage, consumer transportation, pumping mechanism durability, and bottle recycling or disposal pathways.
- Data gaps exist around regional variation in alcohol production methods and the carbon intensity of glycerol and hydrogen peroxide manufacturing processes.
- The assessment assumes standard WHO formulation guidelines but actual products may vary in alcohol concentration and additive composition.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Duane et al. 2022 Environmental Science and Pollution Research — Found that active ingredients contribute 68-83% of total environmental footprint for hand sanitizers.
- Priyanka et al. 2024 Taylor & Francis — Demonstrated that isopropanol-based sanitizers showed lower environmental impacts across 14 of 16 assessed categories.
- WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care — Established standard formulations containing ethanol or isopropanol as primary active ingredients with specific concentration requirements.