Fiberglass Insulation (per sqm)
ConstructionCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 28.6 | 68% | |
| Scope 2 | 3.4 | 8% | |
| Scope 3 | 10.1 | 24% | |
| Total | 42.1 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| glass melting process | S1 | 55% |
| transportation to site | S3 | 18% |
| raw materials extraction and processing | S1 | 13% |
| manufacturing energy consumption | S2 | 8% |
| end-of-life disposal (non-biodegradable) | S3 | 6% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- United States
- Grid Intensity
- 429 gCO2/kWh (EPA 2022)
Material Composition Assumptions
The CCI score assumes a standard fiberglass insulation batt weighing approximately 1.2 kg per square meter with typical thickness. The material composition consists primarily of silica serving as the fundamental glass component at roughly 65% by weight, contributing approximately 780 grams to the total product mass. Recycled glass content varies significantly between manufacturers but represents an estimated 25% by weight or 300 grams of the material. The phenol formaldehyde binder system provides structural integrity at approximately 8% by weight, adding 96 grams to each square meter. Additional mineral fibers and fire resistance additives comprise the remaining 2% by weight, totaling 24 grams of specialized compounds that enhance performance characteristics.
Manufacturing Geography
Fiberglass insulation production concentrates heavily in the United States due to established industrial infrastructure and proximity to both raw material sources and major construction markets. The US electricity grid operates at an average carbon intensity of 429 gCO2 per kilowatt-hour according to EPA data, which directly impacts the manufacturing carbon footprint through energy-intensive glass melting operations. American manufacturing facilities benefit from abundant silica sand deposits and well-developed recycled glass collection systems that reduce raw material transportation requirements. The domestic production base also minimizes intercontinental shipping emissions for North American construction projects, though this advantage diminishes for international exports.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 429 gCO2/kWh | 42 kgCO2e | Baseline (0%) |
| European Union | 310 gCO2/kWh | 38 kgCO2e | -9.5% |
| China | 555 gCO2/kWh | 46 kgCO2e | +9.5% |
| Canada | 130 gCO2/kWh | 33 kgCO2e | -21.4% |
| Mexico | 375 gCO2/kWh | 40 kgCO2e | -4.8% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Factory-specific electricity consumption data per square meter of production including both direct manufacturing energy and facility overhead consumption patterns.
-
Detailed raw material sourcing documentation specifying recycled glass percentage, silica sand transportation distances, and binder chemistry formulations used in production.
-
Plant-level scope 1 emissions measurements covering natural gas combustion for glass melting furnaces and any process-related chemical reactions during fiber formation.
-
Transportation logistics data including shipping distances from manufacturing facility to installation site, delivery vehicle types, and packaging material requirements.
-
End-of-life processing agreements or regional waste management protocols that demonstrate actual disposal or recycling pathways rather than default landfill assumptions.
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate embodied carbon for one square meter of standard thickness fiberglass insulation including raw material extraction through factory gate delivery.
- Scope 1 emissions dominate due to high-temperature glass melting requirements, while scope 2 reflects grid electricity for manufacturing operations and scope 3 captures transportation and disposal phases.
- The functional unit assumes typical residential insulation thickness providing R-value performance between 2.9 and 3.8 per inch of material thickness.
- Operational energy savings during building use phase are excluded from the embodied carbon calculation despite rapid carbon payback periods demonstrated in the literature.
- Regional climate variations that affect insulation performance and associated carbon offset potential represent significant data gaps in current assessment methodologies.
- End-of-life carbon storage benefits from non-biodegradable material properties are not quantified in the baseline score due to disposal pathway uncertainties.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Ecohome 2025 Embodied Carbon in Insulation Materials — Provided comprehensive analysis of fiberglass carbon footprint ranging from 1.7-2.5 kg CO2e per square meter per inch of thickness.
- ScienceDirect 2021 Embodied energy and carbon of building insulating materials — Established glass wool functional unit emissions of 0.6-1.2 kg CO2eq per m² at R-1 with 50-year lifespan.
- EPA 2022 U.S. Fiberglass Insulation Industry Carbon Intensities — Documented total industry emissions of 1.2 million MT CO2e in 2019 with significant plant-to-plant variation.
- Insulation Institute 2024 Setting the Record Straight: Insulation and Low Carbon Buildings — Demonstrated fiberglass carbon payback period of less than one month due to operational energy savings.
- Johns Manville 2025 Fiberglass vs Cellulose Carbon Payback Analysis — Confirmed non-biodegradable nature provides carbon storage advantage over biodegradable alternatives.
- MDPI 2023 The Carbon Footprint of Thermal Insulation — Identified manufacturing as primary environmental hotspot driven by fiber production and fuel combustion.