Fiberglass Insulation (per sqm)

Construction
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

42 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

35 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 28.6 68%
Scope 2 3.4 8%
Scope 3 10.1 24%
Total 42.1 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
glass melting process S1 55%
transportation to site S3 18%
raw materials extraction and processing S1 13%
manufacturing energy consumption S2 8%
end-of-life disposal (non-biodegradable) S3 6%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
United States
Grid Intensity
429 gCO2/kWh (EPA 2022)

Material Composition Assumptions

The CCI score assumes a standard fiberglass insulation batt weighing approximately 1.2 kg per square meter with typical thickness. The material composition consists primarily of silica serving as the fundamental glass component at roughly 65% by weight, contributing approximately 780 grams to the total product mass. Recycled glass content varies significantly between manufacturers but represents an estimated 25% by weight or 300 grams of the material. The phenol formaldehyde binder system provides structural integrity at approximately 8% by weight, adding 96 grams to each square meter. Additional mineral fibers and fire resistance additives comprise the remaining 2% by weight, totaling 24 grams of specialized compounds that enhance performance characteristics.

Manufacturing Geography

Fiberglass insulation production concentrates heavily in the United States due to established industrial infrastructure and proximity to both raw material sources and major construction markets. The US electricity grid operates at an average carbon intensity of 429 gCO2 per kilowatt-hour according to EPA data, which directly impacts the manufacturing carbon footprint through energy-intensive glass melting operations. American manufacturing facilities benefit from abundant silica sand deposits and well-developed recycled glass collection systems that reduce raw material transportation requirements. The domestic production base also minimizes intercontinental shipping emissions for North American construction projects, though this advantage diminishes for international exports.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
United States429 gCO2/kWh42 kgCO2eBaseline (0%)
European Union310 gCO2/kWh38 kgCO2e-9.5%
China555 gCO2/kWh46 kgCO2e+9.5%
Canada130 gCO2/kWh33 kgCO2e-21.4%
Mexico375 gCO2/kWh40 kgCO2e-4.8%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Factory-specific electricity consumption data per square meter of production including both direct manufacturing energy and facility overhead consumption patterns.

  2. Detailed raw material sourcing documentation specifying recycled glass percentage, silica sand transportation distances, and binder chemistry formulations used in production.

  3. Plant-level scope 1 emissions measurements covering natural gas combustion for glass melting furnaces and any process-related chemical reactions during fiber formation.

  4. Transportation logistics data including shipping distances from manufacturing facility to installation site, delivery vehicle types, and packaging material requirements.

  5. End-of-life processing agreements or regional waste management protocols that demonstrate actual disposal or recycling pathways rather than default landfill assumptions.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Ecohome 2025 Embodied Carbon in Insulation Materials — Provided comprehensive analysis of fiberglass carbon footprint ranging from 1.7-2.5 kg CO2e per square meter per inch of thickness.
  2. ScienceDirect 2021 Embodied energy and carbon of building insulating materials — Established glass wool functional unit emissions of 0.6-1.2 kg CO2eq per m² at R-1 with 50-year lifespan.
  3. EPA 2022 U.S. Fiberglass Insulation Industry Carbon Intensities — Documented total industry emissions of 1.2 million MT CO2e in 2019 with significant plant-to-plant variation.
  4. Insulation Institute 2024 Setting the Record Straight: Insulation and Low Carbon Buildings — Demonstrated fiberglass carbon payback period of less than one month due to operational energy savings.
  5. Johns Manville 2025 Fiberglass vs Cellulose Carbon Payback Analysis — Confirmed non-biodegradable nature provides carbon storage advantage over biodegradable alternatives.
  6. MDPI 2023 The Carbon Footprint of Thermal Insulation — Identified manufacturing as primary environmental hotspot driven by fiber production and fuel combustion.
Scan a product in this category →