Life Jacket (PFD)

Safety Equipment
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

32 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

53 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 1.6 5%
Scope 2 4.8 15%
Scope 3 25.6 80%
Total 32 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
foam material production S3 45%
neoprene manufacturing S3 25%
synthetic textile production S3 20%
transportation and logistics S3 8%
assembly and finishing S1 2%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
East Asia
Grid Intensity
550 gCO2/kWh (China national average, IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

Personal flotation devices consist primarily of buoyant foam materials encased within protective textile shells. The dominant buoyancy component utilizes either polyethylene or polyvinyl chloride foam panels, typically comprising 300-400 grams or approximately 50-60% of total product weight. Protective outer shells incorporate neoprene or nylon materials weighing roughly 150-200 grams, representing 25-30% of the unit mass. Polyester webbing forms the strap and fastener systems, contributing 80-120 grams or 15-20% of total weight. Specialized adhesives and protective coatings complete the assembly, adding minimal mass but serving critical waterproofing functions.

Manufacturing Geography

East Asian production facilities, particularly those located in China and Vietnam, dominate global life jacket manufacturing due to established foam processing capabilities and integrated textile supply chains. Chinese manufacturing regions operate under grid electricity with carbon intensity averaging 550 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour, significantly influencing the embedded emissions profile. These locations provide proximity to petrochemical feedstocks required for foam production while maintaining cost-effective labor and logistics infrastructure.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China550 gCO2/kWh32Baseline
Vietnam450 gCO2/kWh29-9%
Germany350 gCO2/kWh38+19%
United States400 gCO2/kWh35+9%
India650 gCO2/kWh36+13%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit certified material composition data specifying foam type, density, and exact textile specifications with third-party verification of constituent materials and their respective carbon intensities.

  2. Provide detailed manufacturing energy consumption records including electricity usage per unit, fuel consumption data, and grid emission factors for the specific production facility location.

  3. Document transportation logistics with shipping distances, mode selection, and carrier efficiency metrics for both inbound materials and outbound finished goods distribution.

  4. Supply evidence of recycled content utilization or bio-based material substitution with documentation of avoided emissions through circular material streams.

  5. Present facility-specific process efficiency improvements or renewable energy adoption that materially reduces manufacturing phase emissions below regional averages.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Neoprene Carbon Intensity Study — Industrial analysis found neoprene production generates approximately 3.2 kg CO2 per kilogram of finished material.
  2. Regional Manufacturing Assessment — Manufacturing location analysis shows Asian production facilities typically achieve 15-25% lower emissions than European counterparts due to different energy grid compositions.
Scan a product in this category →