Disposable Menstrual Pad (pack)
Personal CareCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 4.6 | 8% | |
| Scope 2 | 7 | 12% | |
| Scope 3 | 46.4 | 80% | |
| Total | 58 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| plastic production and processing | S3 | 35% |
| raw material extraction (cotton, wood pulp) | S3 | 28% |
| manufacturing and bleaching processes | S1 | 18% |
| transportation and distribution | S2 | 12% |
| end-of-life disposal and landfill | S3 | 7% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
A standard pack of disposable menstrual pads weighs approximately 300 grams and contains multiple material layers. The top sheet consists of polypropylene or polyethylene fibers weighing roughly 45 grams, representing 15% of total weight. The absorbent core combines air-laid wood pulp and superabsorbent polymers totaling 180 grams or 60% of the product. A polyethylene barrier layer accounts for 30 grams or 10% of weight. Petroleum-based adhesives, bleached cellulose, rayon, and low-density polyethylene strips comprise the remaining 45 grams or 15% of the pack. These materials undergo intensive processing including bleaching treatments that release harmful dioxins during production.
Manufacturing Geography
Primary manufacturing occurs in China, which dominates global feminine hygiene product production due to established supply chains and lower labor costs. Chinese manufacturing facilities operate on a grid intensity of 555 gCO2/kWh, reflecting the country’s coal-heavy electricity generation mix. This carbon-intensive energy profile significantly influences the manufacturing emissions associated with energy-intensive processes like polymer production and bleaching operations. The concentration of raw material suppliers and processing facilities in East Asia creates transportation efficiencies but locks in higher grid-based emissions compared to regions with cleaner electricity sources.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 555 gCO2/kWh | 58 | Baseline |
| India | 708 gCO2/kWh | 63 | +8.6% |
| Germany | 366 gCO2/kWh | 51 | -12.1% |
| United States | 386 gCO2/kWh | 52 | -10.3% |
| Brazil | 85 gCO2/kWh | 42 | -27.6% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Submit facility-specific electricity consumption data and renewable energy procurement documentation to override default grid intensity assumptions for manufacturing operations.
-
Provide detailed material composition specifications including recycled content percentages and alternative fiber sources to adjust raw material extraction impacts.
-
Document transportation modes and distances from raw material sources to manufacturing facilities and from factories to distribution centers.
-
Supply energy consumption data for specific manufacturing processes including polymer extrusion, adhesive application, and packaging operations.
-
Submit waste management and recycling protocols implemented at manufacturing facilities to account for process efficiency improvements.
Methodology Notes
-
The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions for one pack of disposable menstrual pads including raw material extraction, manufacturing, and transportation to retail distribution.
-
Scope 3 emissions dominate at 80% due to plastic polymer production and wood pulp processing occurring upstream in the supply chain.
-
Functional unit assumes a standard retail pack containing 8-12 individual pads weighing approximately 300 grams total.
-
End-of-life disposal impacts are excluded from the core CCI score but represent significant additional environmental burdens lasting 500-800 years in landfills.
-
Data gaps include variations in adhesive formulations and regional differences in wood pulp sourcing practices.
-
The assessment excludes packaging materials beyond primary product wrapping and does not account for consumer transportation to purchase points.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Arena et al. 2022 ScienceDirect — Found that disposable menstrual products comprise predominantly plastics and bleached materials with significant lifecycle impacts.
- Harrison et al. 2023 International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics — Calculated annual carbon footprint of approximately 5.3 kg CO2 equivalent per menstruating person for disposable pad usage.
- Paz et al. 2020 Life Cycle Initiative — Demonstrated that menstrual cups achieve 99% lower environmental impact compared to disposable alternatives across all impact categories.
- Barman et al. 2018 Environmental Science and Pollution Research — Identified plastic production and raw material extraction as the primary environmental impact drivers for disposable menstrual products.
- Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Tampons LCA Study — Analyzed lifecycle impacts of disposable menstrual products including manufacturing processes and end-of-life scenarios.