Midrange Smartphone
ElectronicsCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 28 | 80% | |
| Scope 2 | 4.2 | 12% | |
| Scope 3 | 2.8 | 8% | |
| Total | 35 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated circuit manufacturing | S1 | 45% |
| Display assembly production | S1 | 18% |
| Battery cell manufacturing | S1 | 12% |
| Electricity consumption (manufacturing) | S2 | 12% |
| Transportation and logistics | S3 | 8% |
| Raw material extraction | S1 | 5% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China, Vietnam
- Grid Intensity
- 565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China)
Material Composition Assumptions
The default CCI score assumes a typical midrange smartphone weighing approximately 160 grams with the following material breakdown:
- Aluminum frame and housing: 48g (30%)
- Lithium-ion battery: 39g (24%)
- Display assembly including touchscreen: 28g (18%)
- Printed circuit board with components: 12g (8%)
- Glass or ceramic back panel: 16g (10%)
- Miscellaneous components including cameras, speakers, and connectors: 17g (10%)
This composition reflects standard midrange devices with metal construction, mid-tier processors, and battery capacities between 3000-4500 mAh. Premium materials like titanium frames or ceramic bodies would increase the carbon intensity beyond this baseline.
Manufacturing Geography
The default score assumes production in China and Vietnam, representing the dominant smartphone manufacturing regions. China hosts the majority of integrated circuit fabrication facilities and final assembly operations, while Vietnam provides additional manufacturing capacity for certain components and assembly processes.
The electricity grid intensity of 565 gCO2e/kWh reflects China’s coal-heavy power generation mix, which significantly influences the manufacturing footprint. Manufacturing electricity consumption is particularly intensive during semiconductor fabrication processes that require cleanroom environments and precision machinery operating continuously.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe (EU) | 140 gCO2e/kWh | 29 | -17% |
| United States | 369 gCO2e/kWh | 32 | -9% |
| Global average | 480 gCO2e/kWh | 33 | -6% |
| China (current) | 565 gCO2e/kWh | 35 | baseline |
| India | 708 gCO2e/kWh | 38 | +9% |
Provenance Override Guidance
Suppliers can provide specific data to override the default CCI score:
- Component-specific production data including integrated circuit manufacturing location and electricity sources used during fabrication
- Battery manufacturing details including cell chemistry, production facility location, and energy sources for electrode processing
- Display assembly production information covering panel type, backlight technology, and manufacturing electricity sources
- Transportation documentation showing actual shipping routes, modes of transport, and distances from component suppliers to final assembly
- Final assembly facility data including location, energy consumption profiles, and renewable electricity procurement agreements
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions including raw material extraction, component manufacturing, and final assembly through factory gate
- Manufacturing processes dominate the footprint with 80% scope 1 emissions from direct industrial processes, 12% scope 2 from electricity consumption, and 8% scope 3 from upstream activities
- Functional unit is per individual smartphone device assuming standard midrange specifications
- Use phase emissions are excluded as they depend on user behavior, charging frequency, and local electricity grid rather than inherent product characteristics
- Data gaps exist for emerging manufacturing processes and regional supply chain variations beyond primary production hubs
Related Concepts
Sources
- Cordella et al. (2021) — Journal of Industrial Ecology study finding smartphone CF of 10.7 kg CO2e/year assuming 2-year replacement cycle, with 75% of impacts from printed wiring board, display assembly, and integrated circuits
- Ericsson (2016) — Life cycle assessment of smartphone showing 57 kg CO2-eq total GWP, 19 kg CO2-eq/year, with IC production representing two-thirds of 80% production-stage impacts
- Fairphone 4 LCA (2022) — Official Environmental Product Declaration reporting total impact of 43 kg CO2-eq for 128GB model, with production stage showing biggest contribution to all impact categories
- Ercan & Malmodin (2024) — Study showing smartphone production dominates lifecycle impacts with 85-95% of footprint, finding 18.0 kgCO2-eq/year with 63% from integrated circuit production
- Babbitt et al. (2020) — Nature Scientific Data study providing comprehensive bill of materials for 95 consumer electronics through disassembly, validating 160g average smartphone weight with detailed component breakdown