Milk (1L carton)

Food & Beverage
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

112 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

109 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 84 75%
Scope 2 6 5%
Scope 3 22 20%
Total 112 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
enteric fermentation and manure emissions S1 65%
feed production and land use S1 15%
dairy processing S2 12%
packaging material production S3 5%
milk transportation and distribution S3 3%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
Global dairy regions (New Zealand, EU, North America)
Grid Intensity
0.45 kgCO2e/kWh (global dairy processing average)

Material Composition Assumptions

The typical one-liter milk carton consists primarily of paperboard forming the structural base at approximately 850-900 grams representing 80-85% of the packaging weight. A polymer coating layer provides moisture barrier protection, contributing 70-100 grams or 7-10% of total weight. Standard aseptic cartons include an aluminum foil layer weighing 30-50 grams, representing 3-5% of the package. Additional components include adhesives and printing inks that account for the remaining material weight. The complete packaging represents only 4% of the total product weight, with milk comprising the remaining 96% at 1,030 grams for one liter.

Manufacturing Geography

Dairy processing occurs predominantly in major milk-producing regions including New Zealand, European Union countries, and North America where established dairy infrastructure and favorable climatic conditions support large-scale operations. The grid intensity for dairy processing facilities averages 0.45 kgCO2e/kWh across these primary manufacturing regions, reflecting the mixed energy sources used for pasteurization, homogenization, and packaging operations. These regions maintain the necessary cold chain infrastructure and proximity to dairy farms that minimize transportation emissions while ensuring product quality and safety standards.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
New Zealand0.18 kgCO2e/kWh98-12.5%
Denmark/Netherlands0.25 kgCO2e/kWh105-6.3%
United States0.42 kgCO2e/kWh112Default
Germany0.52 kgCO2e/kWh118+5.4%
India/China0.78 kgCO2e/kWh145+29.5%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Farm-level emissions data including methane measurements from enteric fermentation, manure management practices, and feed composition with documented carbon footprints per kilogram of raw milk produced.

  2. Processing facility energy consumption records showing actual electricity and thermal energy usage during pasteurization, homogenization, and packaging operations with corresponding grid emission factors.

  3. Transportation distances and modes for raw milk collection from farms to processing facilities, plus finished product distribution to retail locations with load factors and vehicle emission specifications.

  4. Packaging material specifications including exact weights and compositions of paperboard, polymer coatings, aluminum layers, and adhesives with supplier-provided carbon footprint data.

  5. Feed sourcing documentation showing origins of cattle feed ingredients, land use change impacts, and agricultural production methods used for feed crops.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Persson et al. 2017 Journal of Cleaner Production — Found significant differences in milk packaging carbon footprints with cartons showing lower emissions than plastic alternatives.
  2. Thoma et al. 2012 Environmental Science & Technology — Demonstrated that raw milk production represents the largest portion of total dairy product carbon footprints.
  3. O'Brien et al. 2010 Agricultural Systems — Quantified regional variations in dairy farm emissions across different production systems.
  4. Gerber et al. 2010 FAO Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector — Identified enteric fermentation and manure management as primary sources of dairy sector emissions.
  5. Flysjö et al. 2011 Agricultural Systems — Analyzed the complete supply chain emissions for dairy products including processing and packaging stages.
  6. Stefanini et al. 2020 The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment — Evaluated environmental impacts of different milk packaging formats with focus on material composition effects.
Scan a product in this category →