Paper Shopping Bag

Packaging
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

72 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

2,400 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 3.6 5%
Scope 2 10.8 15%
Scope 3 57.6 80%
Total 72 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
raw material extraction and pulping S3 35%
paper production process (bleaching, drying, energy) S3 30%
transportation and logistics S3 20%
end-of-life (landfill methane emissions) S3 12%
manufacturing waste and recycling S1 3%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
Global (China, United States, Canada)
Grid Intensity
0.57 kgCO2e/kWh (global weighted average, IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

A standard paper shopping bag contains approximately 30 grams of material distributed across the following components. Kraft paper forms the primary structural element at roughly 85 percent of total weight, derived from virgin fiber pulp or recycled content depending on manufacturer specifications. Virgin fiber pulp comprises the base material when recycled content is unavailable or insufficient for strength requirements. Recycled fiber content varies significantly between manufacturers, typically ranging from zero to seventy percent of total fiber mass. Starch-based adhesives account for approximately 3 percent of bag weight, providing structural integrity at handle attachment points and bottom seams. Optional mineral coatings may add additional weight for enhanced printability or moisture resistance, though these represent less than 2 percent of typical bag composition.

Manufacturing Geography

Paper shopping bag production concentrates primarily in regions with established forestry industries and paper manufacturing infrastructure. China dominates global production capacity, leveraging significant pulp processing facilities and cost-effective manufacturing operations. North American manufacturers in the United States and Canada maintain substantial market share, particularly for domestic consumption, benefiting from abundant forest resources and integrated supply chains. The grid intensity of 0.57 kgCO2e per kilowatt-hour represents a weighted average across these primary manufacturing regions, reflecting the energy-intensive nature of pulping, bleaching, and drying processes required for paper production.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China0.57 kgCO2e/kWh72Baseline
United States0.39 kgCO2e/kWh65-10%
Canada0.15 kgCO2e/kWh48-33%
European Union0.26 kgCO2e/kWh56-22%
Brazil0.07 kgCO2e/kWh42-42%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit detailed material composition data including exact percentages of virgin versus recycled fiber content, adhesive specifications, and any coating materials applied during manufacturing.

  2. Provide energy consumption records for all manufacturing processes including pulping, bleaching, drying, and bag formation operations, along with corresponding electricity grid mix data for the production facility location.

  3. Document transportation distances and methods from fiber source to pulp mill, pulp mill to paper manufacturer, and paper manufacturer to bag production facility, including vehicle fuel efficiency specifications.

  4. Supply waste generation rates and disposal methods for production waste streams, including trim waste, off-specification products, and any material recovery or recycling programs implemented.

  5. Confirm end-of-life disposal scenarios relevant to the intended market, including landfill methane capture rates, composting facility availability, and recycling infrastructure capacity for post-consumer paper bags.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. ScienceDirect 2020 - Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with confined waste management structure — Paper bags generate higher global warming potential than plastic alternatives when biogenic carbon storage is excluded.
  2. Life Cycle Initiative 2020 - Single-use plastic bags and their alternatives: Recommendations from life cycle assessments — Reuse frequency emerges as the most critical factor determining environmental performance of different bag materials.
  3. UK Government 2011 - Life cycle assessment of supermarket carrier bags — Paper bags require significantly more material mass and transportation energy compared to plastic alternatives.
  4. ScienceDirect 2024 - Life cycle assessment of plastic and paper carrying bags in the Philippines — Production phase dominates the environmental impact profile for paper shopping bags across different regional contexts.
  5. Boustead Consulting and Associates - Comparison of LCA for single-use plastic and paper bags — Manufacturing waste rates for paper bags exceed plastic alternatives by approximately double at twenty percent versus ten percent.
Scan a product in this category →