Pet Carrier (plastic)

Pet Products
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

48 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

32 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 5.76 12%
Scope 2 3.84 8%
Scope 3 38.4 80%
Total 48 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
raw material production (virgin PET resin synthesis) S3 46%
manufacturing and injection molding S3 27%
transportation and distribution S3 15%
end-of-life disposal (landfilling) S3 12%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
547 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2024)

Material Composition Assumptions

The typical plastic pet carrier consists primarily of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as the main structural material. Virgin PET resin, derived from petroleum-based feedstocks including crude oil and natural gas, comprises approximately 85% of the total weight at roughly 1,275 grams. The injection-molded plastic components form the carrier body, door, and ventilation grilles using standard manufacturing processes. Some products incorporate recycled PET content, which can significantly reduce the overall carbon footprint when virgin material is displaced. Minor components include synthetic fabrics for door seals and minimal adhesive materials, totaling approximately 15% of the product weight at 225 grams.

Manufacturing Geography

The majority of plastic pet carriers are manufactured in China, which dominates global PET production and plastic goods manufacturing. Chinese manufacturing facilities operate on a national electrical grid with relatively high carbon intensity at 547 grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt-hour. This region maintains cost advantages for large-scale injection molding operations and benefits from established supply chains for PET resin production. The concentration of manufacturing in China reflects both economic factors and the proximity to major petrochemical production facilities that supply virgin PET feedstock materials.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China547 gCO2/kWh48Baseline
European Union255 gCO2/kWh42-12.5%
United States386 gCO2/kWh45-6.3%
India708 gCO2/kWh52+8.3%
South Korea436 gCO2/kWh46-4.2%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit detailed material composition data showing the percentage of recycled PET content versus virgin PET resin, including supplier certifications for recycled content claims.

  2. Provide manufacturing facility energy consumption records and local grid carbon intensity data, along with any renewable energy purchasing agreements or on-site generation.

  3. Document transportation modes and distances from PET resin suppliers to manufacturing facilities, and from production sites to distribution centers or end customers.

  4. Supply injection molding process specifications including cycle times, energy consumption per unit, and waste material recovery rates during production.

  5. Present end-of-life management data for the specific market region, including local recycling rates, waste-to-energy recovery, and landfill disposal percentages.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. NAPCOR 2023 Life Cycle Assessment Report — Comprehensive analysis of PET plastic lifecycle emissions and recycling benefits
  2. Benavides et al. 2018 ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering — Quantified carbon intensity differences between virgin and recycled PET materials
  3. Franklin Associates 2023 Beverage Container LCA — Environmental impact assessment comparing PET containers to alternative materials
  4. Meta-Analysis of PET Water Bottle Systems 2024 Sustainability — Aggregated findings on PET production emissions across multiple studies
  5. Global PET Supply Chain Analysis 2024 Sustainability — Geographic distribution and emissions profile of worldwide PET manufacturing
Scan a product in this category →