Wet Pet Food Pouch
Food & BeverageCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 4.2 | 8% | |
| Scope 2 | 6.2 | 12% | |
| Scope 3 | 41.6 | 80% | |
| Total | 52 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| ingredient production (animal proteins) | S3 | 70% |
| raw material extraction & processing | S3 | 12% |
| packaging material production | S1/S3 | 10% |
| distribution & transportation | S3 | 6% |
| manufacturing (retort/sterilization) | S1 | 2% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China, Thailand, United States
- Grid Intensity
- 554 kgCO2e/MWh (China, 2023 IEA)
Material Composition Assumptions
This analysis assumes a standard 120-gram wet pet food pouch with multi-layer flexible packaging construction. The primary structural layer consists of polypropylene film representing approximately 75% of the packaging weight or roughly 9 grams. An aluminum foil barrier layer comprises 20% of the material composition at 2.4 grams, providing essential oxygen and light protection for product preservation. The remaining 5% consists of polyethylene terephthalate film weighing 0.6 grams for additional structural integrity. Emerging sustainable alternatives include mono-material polypropylene designs and carton-based formats containing up to 73% renewable fiber content, though these represent a small market share currently.
Manufacturing Geography
Primary manufacturing occurs across China, Thailand, and the United States, with China representing the largest production volume due to established flexible packaging infrastructure and cost advantages. The carbon intensity of China’s electrical grid at 554 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent per megawatt-hour significantly influences the manufacturing emissions profile. Thailand serves as a key regional hub for Southeast Asian markets with moderate grid intensity, while United States facilities primarily supply domestic demand with varied regional grid characteristics. The geographic distribution reflects proximity to both raw material suppliers and major pet food manufacturing centers.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 554 kgCO2e/MWh | 52 | Baseline |
| Thailand | 423 kgCO2e/MWh | 49 | -6% |
| United States (Average) | 386 kgCO2e/MWh | 47 | -10% |
| Germany | 366 kgCO2e/MWh | 46 | -12% |
| Brazil | 88 kgCO2e/MWh | 38 | -27% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Specific ingredient sourcing data including protein source locations, processing methods, and transportation distances for all food components within the pouch.
-
Detailed packaging material specifications with actual polymer grades, layer thicknesses, barrier coating types, and recycled content percentages used in production.
-
Manufacturing facility energy consumption profiles including renewable energy procurement, process heating fuel sources, and sterilization equipment efficiency ratings.
-
Transportation logistics documentation covering inbound raw material shipping modes, finished product distribution networks, and packaging density optimization measures.
-
End-of-life management data including local recycling infrastructure capabilities, material recovery rates, and waste treatment pathways in target markets.
Methodology Notes
-
The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions for a single 120-gram wet pet food pouch including all upstream ingredients, packaging materials, and manufacturing processes.
-
Scope 3 emissions dominate at 80% primarily due to animal protein ingredient production and associated land use impacts from livestock farming operations.
-
The functional unit captures one complete pouch as typically purchased and consumed, excluding consumer transportation and disposal phases.
-
Regional regulatory differences affecting recycled content mandates and packaging design requirements are not reflected in the baseline assessment.
-
Data limitations exist around emerging bio-based barrier materials and novel protein sources that may significantly alter future emission profiles.
-
The assessment excludes potential carbon sequestration benefits from sustainable agriculture practices in ingredient supply chains.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Oliveira et al. 2022 Scientific Reports — Demonstrated that wet pet food generates significantly higher carbon emissions than dry alternatives due to water content and processing requirements.
- Beton et al. 2018 European Commission PEFCR — Established that ingredient selection dominates the carbon footprint of pet food products, accounting for the majority of lifecycle emissions.
- Vellinga & Leenstra 2021 Environmental Science & Technology — Quantified the environmental impact differences between flexible packaging formats and traditional metal cans for food products.
- Amcor ASSET Life Cycle Assessment 2024 — Analyzed the carbon footprint of multi-layer flexible packaging materials and identified key emission reduction opportunities.
- Thrane et al. 2024 ScienceDirect — Evaluated transportation efficiency benefits of lightweight flexible pouches compared to rigid packaging formats.
- Raatz et al. 2023 All About Feed — Assessed emerging sustainable packaging alternatives including mono-material and bio-based options for pet food applications.