Wet Pet Food Pouch

Food & Beverage
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

52 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

433 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 4.2 8%
Scope 2 6.2 12%
Scope 3 41.6 80%
Total 52 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
ingredient production (animal proteins) S3 70%
raw material extraction & processing S3 12%
packaging material production S1/S3 10%
distribution & transportation S3 6%
manufacturing (retort/sterilization) S1 2%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China, Thailand, United States
Grid Intensity
554 kgCO2e/MWh (China, 2023 IEA)

Material Composition Assumptions

This analysis assumes a standard 120-gram wet pet food pouch with multi-layer flexible packaging construction. The primary structural layer consists of polypropylene film representing approximately 75% of the packaging weight or roughly 9 grams. An aluminum foil barrier layer comprises 20% of the material composition at 2.4 grams, providing essential oxygen and light protection for product preservation. The remaining 5% consists of polyethylene terephthalate film weighing 0.6 grams for additional structural integrity. Emerging sustainable alternatives include mono-material polypropylene designs and carton-based formats containing up to 73% renewable fiber content, though these represent a small market share currently.

Manufacturing Geography

Primary manufacturing occurs across China, Thailand, and the United States, with China representing the largest production volume due to established flexible packaging infrastructure and cost advantages. The carbon intensity of China’s electrical grid at 554 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent per megawatt-hour significantly influences the manufacturing emissions profile. Thailand serves as a key regional hub for Southeast Asian markets with moderate grid intensity, while United States facilities primarily supply domestic demand with varied regional grid characteristics. The geographic distribution reflects proximity to both raw material suppliers and major pet food manufacturing centers.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China554 kgCO2e/MWh52Baseline
Thailand423 kgCO2e/MWh49-6%
United States (Average)386 kgCO2e/MWh47-10%
Germany366 kgCO2e/MWh46-12%
Brazil88 kgCO2e/MWh38-27%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Specific ingredient sourcing data including protein source locations, processing methods, and transportation distances for all food components within the pouch.

  2. Detailed packaging material specifications with actual polymer grades, layer thicknesses, barrier coating types, and recycled content percentages used in production.

  3. Manufacturing facility energy consumption profiles including renewable energy procurement, process heating fuel sources, and sterilization equipment efficiency ratings.

  4. Transportation logistics documentation covering inbound raw material shipping modes, finished product distribution networks, and packaging density optimization measures.

  5. End-of-life management data including local recycling infrastructure capabilities, material recovery rates, and waste treatment pathways in target markets.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Oliveira et al. 2022 Scientific Reports — Demonstrated that wet pet food generates significantly higher carbon emissions than dry alternatives due to water content and processing requirements.
  2. Beton et al. 2018 European Commission PEFCR — Established that ingredient selection dominates the carbon footprint of pet food products, accounting for the majority of lifecycle emissions.
  3. Vellinga & Leenstra 2021 Environmental Science & Technology — Quantified the environmental impact differences between flexible packaging formats and traditional metal cans for food products.
  4. Amcor ASSET Life Cycle Assessment 2024 — Analyzed the carbon footprint of multi-layer flexible packaging materials and identified key emission reduction opportunities.
  5. Thrane et al. 2024 ScienceDirect — Evaluated transportation efficiency benefits of lightweight flexible pouches compared to rigid packaging formats.
  6. Raatz et al. 2023 All About Feed — Assessed emerging sustainable packaging alternatives including mono-material and bio-based options for pet food applications.
Scan a product in this category →