Single-Use Plastic Bag
PackagingCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 2.4 | 5% | |
| Scope 2 | 16.8 | 35% | |
| Scope 3 | 28.8 | 60% | |
| Total | 48 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| raw material extraction and refining (ethylene/polyethylene production) | S3 | 35% |
| resin manufacturing and extrusion processing | S1 | 28% |
| transportation and distribution (production to retail) | S2 | 22% |
| end-of-life disposal (landfill emissions and incineration) | S3 | 15% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 555 kgCO2e/MWh (IEA 2024)
Material Composition Assumptions
The default assessment considers a standard grocery bag weighing approximately 32.5 grams with the following material breakdown:
- High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE): 29 grams (90%) representing the primary structural material
- Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE): 2 grams (6%) used in alternative formulations for flexibility
- Petroleum-derived feedstock inputs: 1 gram (3%) accounting for processing chemicals
- Additives and colorants: 0.5 grams (1%) including trace amounts of stabilizers and pigments
This composition reflects typical grocery store bags manufactured through blown film extrusion processes. The HDPE content provides structural integrity while maintaining the lightweight characteristics that define single-use applications.
Manufacturing Geography
China serves as the primary manufacturing region for global plastic bag production, accounting for the largest share of polyethylene processing capacity worldwide. The country’s extensive petrochemical infrastructure and proximity to major polymer feedstock sources create cost advantages that drive international supply chains.
Chinese manufacturing facilities typically operate on a grid intensity of 555 kgCO2e/MWh, reflecting the coal-heavy electricity generation mix. This relatively high carbon intensity significantly influences the manufacturing emissions profile, particularly during the energy-intensive resin processing and film extrusion stages that require substantial thermal energy inputs.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 555 kgCO2e/MWh | 48 | Baseline |
| United States | 386 kgCO2e/MWh | 42 | -12.5% |
| European Union | 253 kgCO2e/MWh | 37 | -23% |
| India | 708 kgCO2e/MWh | 54 | +12.5% |
| Southeast Asia | 615 kgCO2e/MWh | 51 | +6% |
Provenance Override Guidance
Suppliers can submit the following data types to override the default CCI score with facility-specific measurements:
- Direct energy consumption data from resin manufacturing and film extrusion processes, including natural gas and electricity usage per kilogram of finished bags
- Transportation manifests showing actual shipping distances and modes from petrochemical facilities to bag manufacturing sites
- Waste management contracts and disposal records demonstrating end-of-life treatment methods for production waste streams
- Third-party verified life cycle assessments conducted within the past three years using ISO 14040 methodology standards
- Renewable energy certificates or power purchase agreements documenting clean electricity procurement for manufacturing operations
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-grave emissions including raw material extraction, manufacturing, distribution, and end-of-life disposal for one standard grocery bag
- Scope 3 dominates the emissions profile due to upstream petroleum refining and downstream waste management impacts beyond direct manufacturing control
- The functional unit assumes a single-use scenario without reuse or recycling, reflecting typical consumer behavior patterns
- Transportation emissions exclude consumer trips to retail locations but include distribution from manufacturing facilities to points of sale
- End-of-life calculations assume landfill disposal as the predominant waste management pathway based on global recycling statistics
- Data gaps exist for regional variations in waste infrastructure and long-term degradation impacts in marine environments
Related Concepts
Sources
- Life Cycle Initiative 2021 Meta-analysis — Comprehensive review found standard plastic bags emit approximately 200g CO2 equivalent across their full lifecycle.
- California State University, Chico 2020 LCA Study — Comparative assessment demonstrated paper alternatives generate three to five times higher greenhouse gas emissions than HDPE bags.
- Singapore Case Study 2020 Journal of Cleaner Production — Analysis revealed reusable bags require 50-150 uses to offset their higher production emissions compared to single-use options.
- China Multi-Regional Analysis 2023 Waste Management Research — Regional variation study showed transportation distances and waste infrastructure significantly affect total emissions profiles.
- Canada Single-Use Plastic Ban LCA 2024 Sustainability — Policy assessment found only one in 200 plastic bags reaches recycling facilities with 91% globally remaining unrecycled.
- Yale Climate Connections 2019 Climate Review — Global assessment estimated 500 billion plastic bags used annually worldwide with minimal biodegradation potential.
- EPA WARM Model 2014 Plastics Assessment — Waste management analysis found HDPE bags remain inert in landfills while paper alternatives emit methane during decomposition.