Rubber Cleaning Gloves (pair)
HouseholdCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 15.8 | 35% | |
| Scope 2 | 2.3 | 5% | |
| Scope 3 | 27 | 60% | |
| Total | 45.1 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| rubber cultivation and concentrated latex production | S3 | 38% |
| glove manufacturing (heating, drying, curing) | S1 | 32% |
| transportation and shipping (international logistics) | S3 | 12% |
| end-of-life disposal (incineration or landfilling) | S3 | 10% |
| chemical additives (sulfur, accelerators, plasticizers) | S1 | 8% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- Southeast Asia (Thailand, Malaysia)
- Grid Intensity
- 0.52 kgCO2e/kWh (Thailand grid average, IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
A typical pair of rubber cleaning gloves weighs approximately 80 grams and consists primarily of natural rubber latex derived from the Hevea brasiliensis tree. The concentrated latex makes up roughly 85% of the total weight, providing the flexible base material. Sulfur compounds account for about 2% of the composition, serving as vulcanizing agents that cross-link the rubber polymers during curing. Chemical accelerators and stabilizers represent approximately 3% of the weight, enhancing the vulcanization process and improving product durability. Plasticizers comprise another 5% to maintain flexibility and tactile properties. The remaining 5% includes chlorine-based surface treatments applied during finishing to reduce surface tackiness and improve donning characteristics.
Manufacturing Geography
The majority of rubber cleaning gloves are manufactured in Southeast Asian countries, particularly Thailand and Malaysia, which together account for over 60% of global production. This geographic concentration stems from proximity to natural rubber plantations and established latex processing infrastructure. Thailand’s electricity grid operates at an average intensity of 0.52 kgCO2e per kWh, reflecting the country’s mixed energy portfolio of natural gas, coal, and hydroelectric power. Manufacturing facilities in this region benefit from lower labor costs, well-developed supply chains for raw materials, and government policies supporting the rubber industry. The tropical climate also provides optimal conditions for both rubber cultivation and the energy-intensive drying processes required in glove manufacturing.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 0.52 kgCO2e/kWh | 45 | Baseline (0%) |
| Malaysia | 0.49 kgCO2e/kWh | 43 | -4% |
| China (coal-heavy) | 0.71 kgCO2e/kWh | 52 | +16% |
| Vietnam | 0.58 kgCO2e/kWh | 47 | +4% |
| India | 0.82 kgCO2e/kWh | 55 | +22% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Submit energy consumption data (kWh per kilogram) for heating, drying, and chlorination processes during manufacturing, along with local electricity grid carbon intensity documentation.
-
Provide transportation manifests showing shipping distances and modes from latex source to manufacturing facility, and from facility to final distribution point.
-
Document natural latex sourcing practices including plantation location, fertilizer application rates, and concentrated latex production methods with associated energy inputs.
-
Supply detailed material composition data showing actual percentages of natural latex, sulfur compounds, accelerators, and other chemical additives used in production.
-
Present end-of-life waste management practices including disposal methods, recycling rates, and any energy recovery processes applicable to your distribution markets.
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-grave emissions for one pair of disposable rubber cleaning gloves assuming single-use application and typical disposal patterns.
- Scope 1 emissions reflect direct manufacturing processes including fuel combustion for heating and curing, while Scope 3 dominates due to upstream latex production and downstream disposal impacts.
- The functional unit assumes standard medium-sized gloves weighing 80 grams per pair with typical thickness and durability specifications.
- Packaging materials and retail storage emissions are excluded from this assessment due to high variability across distribution channels.
- Data gaps exist around specific fertilizer types used in rubber plantations and regional variations in waste management infrastructure that could affect end-of-life emissions.
- The assessment does not account for potential reuse scenarios, which could reduce per-use emissions by approximately half if gloves are cleaned and reused once.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Patrawoot et al. 2021 SPE Polymers — Manufacturing energy requirements for vulcanizing and chlorination processes represent major emission hotspots in rubber glove production.
- Usubharatana & Phungrassami Applied Ecology and Environmental Research — Fertilizer application during rubber tree cultivation dominates upstream emissions in the natural latex supply chain.
- Jamal et al. 2021 LCA Study — Cradle-to-grave emissions for latex gloves demonstrate that production phases contribute the majority of lifecycle impacts.
- STiCH 2022 Cultural Heritage Organization — Reusing disposable gloves multiple times can significantly reduce per-use carbon intensity in institutional settings.
- Arbor 2024 Carbon Footprint Database — Natural latex exhibits lower carbon intensity compared to synthetic rubber alternatives used in nitrile and vinyl gloves.