Rubber Cleaning Gloves (pair)

Household
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

45 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

562 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 15.8 35%
Scope 2 2.3 5%
Scope 3 27 60%
Total 45.1 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
rubber cultivation and concentrated latex production S3 38%
glove manufacturing (heating, drying, curing) S1 32%
transportation and shipping (international logistics) S3 12%
end-of-life disposal (incineration or landfilling) S3 10%
chemical additives (sulfur, accelerators, plasticizers) S1 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
Southeast Asia (Thailand, Malaysia)
Grid Intensity
0.52 kgCO2e/kWh (Thailand grid average, IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

A typical pair of rubber cleaning gloves weighs approximately 80 grams and consists primarily of natural rubber latex derived from the Hevea brasiliensis tree. The concentrated latex makes up roughly 85% of the total weight, providing the flexible base material. Sulfur compounds account for about 2% of the composition, serving as vulcanizing agents that cross-link the rubber polymers during curing. Chemical accelerators and stabilizers represent approximately 3% of the weight, enhancing the vulcanization process and improving product durability. Plasticizers comprise another 5% to maintain flexibility and tactile properties. The remaining 5% includes chlorine-based surface treatments applied during finishing to reduce surface tackiness and improve donning characteristics.

Manufacturing Geography

The majority of rubber cleaning gloves are manufactured in Southeast Asian countries, particularly Thailand and Malaysia, which together account for over 60% of global production. This geographic concentration stems from proximity to natural rubber plantations and established latex processing infrastructure. Thailand’s electricity grid operates at an average intensity of 0.52 kgCO2e per kWh, reflecting the country’s mixed energy portfolio of natural gas, coal, and hydroelectric power. Manufacturing facilities in this region benefit from lower labor costs, well-developed supply chains for raw materials, and government policies supporting the rubber industry. The tropical climate also provides optimal conditions for both rubber cultivation and the energy-intensive drying processes required in glove manufacturing.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
Thailand0.52 kgCO2e/kWh45Baseline (0%)
Malaysia0.49 kgCO2e/kWh43-4%
China (coal-heavy)0.71 kgCO2e/kWh52+16%
Vietnam0.58 kgCO2e/kWh47+4%
India0.82 kgCO2e/kWh55+22%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit energy consumption data (kWh per kilogram) for heating, drying, and chlorination processes during manufacturing, along with local electricity grid carbon intensity documentation.

  2. Provide transportation manifests showing shipping distances and modes from latex source to manufacturing facility, and from facility to final distribution point.

  3. Document natural latex sourcing practices including plantation location, fertilizer application rates, and concentrated latex production methods with associated energy inputs.

  4. Supply detailed material composition data showing actual percentages of natural latex, sulfur compounds, accelerators, and other chemical additives used in production.

  5. Present end-of-life waste management practices including disposal methods, recycling rates, and any energy recovery processes applicable to your distribution markets.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Patrawoot et al. 2021 SPE Polymers — Manufacturing energy requirements for vulcanizing and chlorination processes represent major emission hotspots in rubber glove production.
  2. Usubharatana & Phungrassami Applied Ecology and Environmental Research — Fertilizer application during rubber tree cultivation dominates upstream emissions in the natural latex supply chain.
  3. Jamal et al. 2021 LCA Study — Cradle-to-grave emissions for latex gloves demonstrate that production phases contribute the majority of lifecycle impacts.
  4. STiCH 2022 Cultural Heritage Organization — Reusing disposable gloves multiple times can significantly reduce per-use carbon intensity in institutional settings.
  5. Arbor 2024 Carbon Footprint Database — Natural latex exhibits lower carbon intensity compared to synthetic rubber alternatives used in nitrile and vinyl gloves.
Scan a product in this category →