Scrub Brush (plastic)
HouseholdCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 3 | 8% | |
| Scope 2 | 4.6 | 12% | |
| Scope 3 | 30.4 | 80% | |
| Total | 38 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| polypropylene handle production | S3 | 45% |
| nylon bristle manufacturing | S3 | 25% |
| transportation and logistics | S3 | 15% |
| end-of-life disposal | S3 | 10% |
| packaging materials | S3 | 5% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
A typical plastic scrub brush weighs approximately 150 grams and consists of several petroleum-derived components. The handle comprises 90 grams of polypropylene material, representing 60% of the total product weight. The cleaning bristles contain 45 grams of nylon 6 fibers, accounting for 30% of the brush weight. Cardboard packaging materials contribute 12 grams or 8% of the total mass. The remaining 3 grams consist of adhesives and synthetic dyes used to bond components and provide color, making up 2% of the overall composition.
Manufacturing Geography
Most plastic scrub brushes are manufactured in China, where established petrochemical infrastructure and lower production costs drive competitive pricing. Chinese manufacturing facilities typically utilize an electricity grid with carbon intensity of 555 gCO2/kWh, which influences the overall emissions profile during production phases. The concentration of plastic resin suppliers and molding equipment in coastal Chinese provinces creates supply chain efficiencies that reduce transportation emissions between material suppliers and final assembly operations.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 555 gCO2/kWh | 38 | Baseline |
| Germany | 366 gCO2/kWh | 41 | +8% |
| United States | 386 gCO2/kWh | 40 | +5% |
| India | 708 gCO2/kWh | 35 | -8% |
| Mexico | 458 gCO2/kWh | 39 | +3% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Submit verified electricity consumption data and grid carbon intensity factors for the specific manufacturing facility location.
-
Provide detailed material sourcing documentation showing recycled content percentages for polypropylene handle and nylon bristle components.
-
Document transportation distances and modes for raw materials from petrochemical suppliers to manufacturing facilities.
-
Supply end-of-life disposal or recycling data specific to the target market region where products will be sold.
-
Include packaging optimization metrics showing reduced cardboard usage or alternative material substitutions.
Methodology Notes
-
The CCI score represents cradle-to-grave emissions for a standard plastic scrub brush with typical 6-12 month lifespan before disposal.
-
Scope 3 emissions dominate the carbon footprint due to upstream petroleum extraction and plastic resin production processes.
-
The functional unit assumes normal household cleaning usage patterns with minimal potential for reuse or recycling.
-
Emissions from water heating during actual cleaning use are excluded from the product-specific carbon footprint calculation.
-
Data gaps exist for regional variations in plastic waste management infrastructure and disposal method carbon impacts.
-
Manufacturing equipment energy consumption estimates rely on industry averages rather than facility-specific measurements.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Boucher J et al. 2017 Environ Sci Technol — Quantified carbon emissions from virgin plastic resin production for common household products.
- Hardesty BD et al. 2020 Environ Res Lett — Analyzed lifecycle impacts of plastic cleaning implements including transportation and disposal pathways.
- Valavanidis A et al. 2018 Chemosphere — Assessed environmental impacts of polypropylene and nylon manufacturing across different regional contexts.