Scrub Brush (plastic)

Household
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

38 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

253 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 3 8%
Scope 2 4.6 12%
Scope 3 30.4 80%
Total 38 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
polypropylene handle production S3 45%
nylon bristle manufacturing S3 25%
transportation and logistics S3 15%
end-of-life disposal S3 10%
packaging materials S3 5%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

A typical plastic scrub brush weighs approximately 150 grams and consists of several petroleum-derived components. The handle comprises 90 grams of polypropylene material, representing 60% of the total product weight. The cleaning bristles contain 45 grams of nylon 6 fibers, accounting for 30% of the brush weight. Cardboard packaging materials contribute 12 grams or 8% of the total mass. The remaining 3 grams consist of adhesives and synthetic dyes used to bond components and provide color, making up 2% of the overall composition.

Manufacturing Geography

Most plastic scrub brushes are manufactured in China, where established petrochemical infrastructure and lower production costs drive competitive pricing. Chinese manufacturing facilities typically utilize an electricity grid with carbon intensity of 555 gCO2/kWh, which influences the overall emissions profile during production phases. The concentration of plastic resin suppliers and molding equipment in coastal Chinese provinces creates supply chain efficiencies that reduce transportation emissions between material suppliers and final assembly operations.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2/kWh38Baseline
Germany366 gCO2/kWh41+8%
United States386 gCO2/kWh40+5%
India708 gCO2/kWh35-8%
Mexico458 gCO2/kWh39+3%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit verified electricity consumption data and grid carbon intensity factors for the specific manufacturing facility location.

  2. Provide detailed material sourcing documentation showing recycled content percentages for polypropylene handle and nylon bristle components.

  3. Document transportation distances and modes for raw materials from petrochemical suppliers to manufacturing facilities.

  4. Supply end-of-life disposal or recycling data specific to the target market region where products will be sold.

  5. Include packaging optimization metrics showing reduced cardboard usage or alternative material substitutions.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Boucher J et al. 2017 Environ Sci Technol — Quantified carbon emissions from virgin plastic resin production for common household products.
  2. Hardesty BD et al. 2020 Environ Res Lett — Analyzed lifecycle impacts of plastic cleaning implements including transportation and disposal pathways.
  3. Valavanidis A et al. 2018 Chemosphere — Assessed environmental impacts of polypropylene and nylon manufacturing across different regional contexts.
Scan a product in this category →