Shampoo (250ml plastic bottle)

Personal Care
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

48 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

160 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 2.4 5%
Scope 2 3.8 8%
Scope 3 41.8 87%
Total 48 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
consumer use (hot water heating) S3 88%
plastic packaging production and transport S1 5%
raw material production (petrochemical surfactants) S1 4%
distribution and logistics S1 2%
end-of-life disposal S3 1%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

The 250ml shampoo bottle comprises multiple components with distinct environmental footprints. The HDPE plastic bottle body represents approximately 25 grams of the total product weight, constituting roughly 8% of the complete package. The PP pump mechanism adds another 5 grams, contributing about 2% to overall mass. The liquid formulation makes up the majority at 250 grams, representing 83% of total weight. Within this formulation, water comprises the largest share at approximately 200 grams. Petrochemical-derived surfactants including sodium laureth sulfate and cocamidopropyl betaine account for roughly 25 grams of the liquid content. Preservatives and synthetic additives make up the remaining 25 grams of formulation weight. The complete packaged product totals approximately 300 grams.

Manufacturing Geography

Primary manufacturing occurs in China, where the majority of global personal care products are produced due to established supply chains and lower production costs. The Chinese electricity grid operates at 555 gCO2/kWh intensity according to International Energy Agency data, reflecting the country’s coal-heavy energy mix. This carbon-intensive grid significantly impacts the manufacturing phase emissions for both the plastic packaging and chemical formulation processes. Many multinational brands utilize Chinese contract manufacturers for cost efficiency, though some premium products may be manufactured in regions with cleaner energy profiles such as Europe or North America.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2/kWh48Baseline
India708 gCO2/kWh52+8% higher
Germany348 gCO2/kWh44-8% lower
France57 gCO2/kWh38-21% lower
United States386 gCO2/kWh45-6% lower

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Manufacturing facility electricity consumption data with renewable energy procurement documentation to replace grid intensity assumptions
  2. Detailed bill of materials with supplier-specific environmental product declarations for plastic resin and chemical surfactants
  3. Transportation records showing actual shipping distances and modal splits from manufacturing to distribution centers
  4. Packaging specifications including exact plastic weights, recycled content percentages, and barrier material requirements
  5. Formulation details with biodegradability data and renewable versus petrochemical ingredient ratios

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. CarbonBright 2024 Life Cycle Assessment Study — Comprehensive analysis showing use phase emissions dominate personal care product carbon footprints
  2. Okada et al. 2021 Cleaner Production — Research demonstrating significant packaging optimization potential for liquid cosmetic products
  3. Golsteijn et al. 2018 IEAM — Study quantifying environmental impacts across beauty and personal care product lifecycles
  4. Vasquez 2023 Packaging Technology & Science — Analysis of flexible versus rigid packaging alternatives for liquid personal care formulations
  5. Carbon Trust 2023 Beauty & Personal Care Report — Industry assessment highlighting refillable packaging models as emission reduction strategy
Scan a product in this category →