Android Midrange Smartphone
ElectronicsCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.5 | 1% | |
| Scope 2 | 7 | 16% | |
| Scope 3 | 37.5 | 83% | |
| Total | 45 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated circuits (SoC, memory, modem) | S3 | 30% |
| LCD/AMOLED display panel | S3 | 16% |
| Final assembly and test | S2 | 16% |
| Lithium-ion battery cell | S3 | 14% |
| PCB assembly and passive components | S3 | 12% |
| Enclosure (polycarbonate/aluminum), packaging, logistics | S3 | 12% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China (Dongguan), Vietnam
- Grid Intensity
- 565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China average)
Product Profile
The midrange Android smartphone represents devices in the $200-$400 price bracket: phones with mature-node SoCs (6 nm or 7 nm), LCD or AMOLED displays, polycarbonate or aluminum frames, and dual-camera setups. Reference products include the Samsung Galaxy A54, Xiaomi Redmi Note series, and Fairphone 4.
At 45 kgCO2e per device, this is roughly 40% lower than the iPhone-tier profile, driven primarily by less advanced semiconductor nodes and simpler materials.
Why the Score Differs from Premium
The gap between midrange and premium is not about assembly — it is about what goes into the device:
- Mature-node SoC (6-7 nm vs. 3-4 nm) requires fewer lithography passes and less extreme manufacturing conditions, reducing per-chip embodied carbon by an estimated 30-50%.
- Polycarbonate back panel instead of glass or titanium has 60-80% lower embodied carbon per unit mass.
- LCD display (common in lower-midrange) uses simpler manufacturing than OLED, though the gap is narrowing.
- Smaller camera modules and fewer sensors reduce component count and upstream supply chain emissions.
Scope Breakdown Detail
| Scope | kgCO2e | % of Total | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.5 | 1% | Soldering, cleaning processes |
| Scope 2 | 7 | 16% | Assembly plant electricity |
| Scope 3 | 37.5 | 83% | Components, materials, transport |
| Total | 45 | 100% |
The Scope 3 proportion (83%) is nearly identical to premium devices. This confirms that the supply chain — not the final assembly — is the dominant emissions driver regardless of price tier.
Confidence Note
Medium confidence reflects the wider variance in this segment. Unlike Apple, which publishes detailed PERs for every model, midrange Android manufacturers publish less granular data. The Fairphone LCA and Samsung A-series reports provide the strongest data points, but the segment spans a very wide range of designs and manufacturers.
Provenance Override
Manufacturers may submit ISO 14067-compliant PCFs to override this default. Fairphone’s published LCA is an example of the documentation standard required. Samsung’s Carbon Trust-certified reports for the A-series also qualify.
Related Products
Related Concepts
Sources
- Samsung Electronics — Galaxy A-series Product Environmental Reports, 2023-2024. Galaxy A54 reports approximately 35-42 kgCO2e per device.
- Fairphone — Fairphone 4 LCA Report, 2022. Reports 42 kgCO2e with detailed bill-of-materials breakdown. Peer-reviewed under ISO 14040.
- Ericsson — Life cycle environmental impacts of a smartphone. Peer-reviewed LCA covering a generic mid-range device.
- Cordella et al. (2021) — Journal of Industrial Ecology. doi:10.1111/jiec.13119. Comparative LCA of ICT devices across tiers.
- IEA — Emissions Factors 2024. China/Vietnam grid intensities for Scope 2 calculations.