Plastic Storage Bin
Home & OrganizationCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 14.7 | 35% | |
| Scope 2 | 6.3 | 15% | |
| Scope 3 | 21 | 50% | |
| Total | 42 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| virgin material production | S1 | 35% |
| fossil fuel extraction and refining | S3 | 28% |
| transportation and distribution | S3 | 18% |
| energy use in polymerization | S1 | 12% |
| end-of-life and waste disposal | S3 | 7% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China, India, Southeast Asia
- Grid Intensity
- 650 kgCO2e/MWh (China national average - IEA 2024)
Material Composition Assumptions
A typical plastic storage bin consists primarily of polypropylene resin, which makes up approximately 95% of the total product weight. For a standard 1.5 kilogram storage container, this translates to roughly 1,425 grams of polypropylene material. The remaining 5% consists of colorants, UV stabilizers, and processing additives that enhance durability and appearance, totaling approximately 75 grams. Virgin polypropylene derived from crude oil refining represents the dominant material input, though some manufacturers incorporate recycled polypropylene content to reduce environmental impact. The polymer structure provides the necessary strength and flexibility characteristics required for repeated use cycles.
Manufacturing Geography
Plastic storage bins are predominantly manufactured in Asia, with China, India, and Southeast Asian countries serving as major production hubs. These regions benefit from established petrochemical infrastructure, proximity to raw material sources, and cost-effective labor markets. The manufacturing process occurs in facilities that typically rely on regional electrical grids with carbon intensities ranging from 400 to 800 kgCO2e per megawatt-hour. China’s national grid intensity averages approximately 650 kgCO2e/MWh, significantly influencing the carbon footprint of products manufactured there. The concentration of polypropylene resin production and injection molding capabilities in these regions has created integrated supply chains that reduce intermediate transportation requirements.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | 480 kgCO2e/MWh | 35 | -17% |
| European Union | 350 kgCO2e/MWh | 32 | -24% |
| China | 650 kgCO2e/MWh | 42 | Default |
| GCC Countries | 720 kgCO2e/MWh | 46 | +10% |
| India | 750 kgCO2e/MWh | 48 | +14% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Submit certified material composition data showing actual polypropylene content percentages and any recycled material incorporation with third-party verification.
-
Provide facility-specific energy consumption records and local grid emission factors or renewable energy procurement documentation for the manufacturing location.
-
Supply detailed transportation logistics including shipping distances, modal split between ocean freight and trucking, and actual fuel consumption data for distribution routes.
-
Document production process specifications including injection molding parameters, cycle times, and energy efficiency metrics for the specific manufacturing equipment used.
-
Present end-of-life management data including actual recycling rates, waste diversion percentages, and regional disposal infrastructure capabilities for the target markets.
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions for a standard 1.5 kilogram polypropylene storage bin including raw material extraction through manufacturing completion.
- Scope 1 emissions capture direct manufacturing energy use and polymerization processes at production facilities.
- Scope 2 accounts for purchased electricity consumption during injection molding and facility operations.
- Scope 3 encompasses upstream petroleum extraction, refining, transportation, and downstream distribution impacts.
- The functional unit assumes a 10-year useful life with capacity for multiple reuse cycles displacing single-use alternatives.
- Consumer use phase impacts are excluded as storage bins require no operational energy input during normal usage.
- Regional transportation assumptions may not reflect actual distribution patterns for specific market destinations.
- End-of-life recycling benefits are partially captured but vary significantly based on local waste management infrastructure.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Intertek 2011 Plastics — Provided baseline carbon emission factors for polypropylene production across different manufacturing processes.
- Gulf Petrochemicals Association GCC Study — Documented regional variation in plastic production emissions based on energy grid composition and refinery efficiency.
- Narita et al. Japan LCA Study — Established lower emission benchmarks for polypropylene manufacturing in regions with cleaner energy grids.
- University of Michigan 2024 Reusable Container Study — Quantified the break-even point for reusable plastic containers compared to single-use alternatives.
- NIST 2022 Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Plastics Review — Comprehensive analysis of plastic lifecycle emissions including transportation and end-of-life impacts.