Manual Toothbrush

Personal Care
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

28 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

1,120 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 16.8 60%
Scope 2 1.4 5%
Scope 3 9.8 35%
Total 28 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
material production (nylon/polypropylene/polyethylene) S1 45%
transportation and distribution S3 25%
end-of-life disposal and landfill operations S3 18%
bristle production (nylon extraction/processing) S1 12%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
550 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

Manual toothbrushes primarily consist of a polypropylene handle weighing approximately 15 grams, representing roughly 60% of total product mass. The bristle section contains either nylon or silicone fibers weighing about 3 grams and constituting 12% of the product. Additional components include minor polyethylene or polycarbonate elements for structural reinforcement, typically 2 grams or 8% of mass. Cardboard packaging materials with vegetable-based or synthetic inks add approximately 5 grams, making up the remaining 20% of total product weight.

Manufacturing Geography

China serves as the dominant manufacturing hub for manual toothbrushes due to established plastic processing infrastructure and proximity to petrochemical feedstock sources. The region operates with a grid intensity of approximately 550 gCO2e per kilowatt-hour, reflecting heavy reliance on coal-fired power generation. This energy-intensive manufacturing environment significantly influences the overall carbon footprint through polymer processing, injection molding operations, and bristle extrusion processes required for toothbrush production.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China550 gCO2e/kWh28Baseline
Germany350 gCO2e/kWh24-14%
Nordic Countries150 gCO2e/kWh21-25%
India650 gCO2e/kWh31+11%
Brazil280 gCO2e/kWh23-18%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit verified energy consumption data for injection molding and extrusion processes along with actual electricity grid mix documentation from the manufacturing facility.

  2. Provide material supplier certifications detailing the carbon footprint of virgin polypropylene, nylon, and any recycled content percentages with associated emission factors.

  3. Document transportation methods and distances from raw material suppliers to manufacturing sites, including freight modes and fuel efficiency metrics.

  4. Supply waste management protocols and end-of-life processing agreements that demonstrate alternative disposal pathways beyond standard landfilling assumptions.

  5. Present any renewable energy procurement contracts or on-site generation capacity that reduces reliance on grid electricity during manufacturing operations.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Lyne et al. 2020 British Dental Journal — Comparative study revealed significant carbon footprint differences between conventional plastic and alternative material toothbrush designs.
  2. Mazur et al. 2024 Discover Environment — Environmental assessment demonstrated superior performance of silicone bristles compared to nylon across multiple impact categories.
  3. Duane et al. 2020 British Dental Journal — Lifecycle analysis quantified emission benefits of replaceable-head strategies versus complete product disposal approaches.
Scan a product in this category →