Toothpaste (100ml tube)
Personal CareCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 3 | 8% | |
| Scope 2 | 4.6 | 12% | |
| Scope 3 | 30.4 | 80% | |
| Total | 38 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| use phase water consumption | S3 | 40% |
| ingredient production | S3 | 25% |
| packaging materials (plastic and aluminum) | S1 | 20% |
| transportation (water content) | S2 | 10% |
| end-of-life disposal | S3 | 5% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 555 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
A standard 100ml toothpaste tube consists of a multilayer packaging system combining polyethylene plastic outer layer with aluminum foil barrier layer, totaling approximately 15 grams for the tube itself. The toothpaste formulation contains sorbitol as the primary sweetening agent comprising roughly 70 grams by weight, while glycerin constitutes about 40 grams serving as a humectant. Water content ranges between 20-40 grams depending on formulation, with an assumed 30 grams for this assessment. Abrasive components including calcium carbonate, silica, and dicalcium phosphate make up the remaining 15 grams, providing the cleaning action. The total product weight including packaging reaches approximately 115 grams, with the paste itself accounting for 87% of the mass.
Manufacturing Geography
The majority of global toothpaste production occurs in China, which has emerged as the dominant manufacturing hub for personal care products due to established supply chains for both active ingredients and packaging materials. Chinese manufacturing facilities typically operate on a grid intensity of 555 gCO2e/kWh, reflecting the country’s continued reliance on coal-fired power generation. This relatively high carbon intensity significantly impacts the manufacturing emissions profile, particularly for energy-intensive processes like aluminum foil production and plastic extrusion. The concentration of chemical precursor manufacturing in the same region reduces transportation emissions for raw materials while increasing the overall carbon intensity of production activities.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 555 gCO2e/kWh | 38 | Baseline |
| European Union | 295 gCO2e/kWh | 32 | -16% |
| United States | 385 gCO2e/kWh | 35 | -8% |
| India | 650 gCO2e/kWh | 42 | +11% |
| Brazil | 245 gCO2e/kWh | 30 | -21% |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Manufacturing facility energy consumption data with renewable energy certificates or on-site generation documentation to replace grid intensity assumptions.
-
Detailed ingredient sourcing information including transportation distances and production methods for sorbitol, glycerin, and abrasive materials.
-
Packaging material specifications with recycled content percentages and supplier-specific production emissions data for both aluminum and plastic components.
-
Water content optimization data demonstrating reduced formulation percentages that decrease transportation emissions per functional unit.
-
End-of-life program documentation showing participation in specialized recycling initiatives or take-back programs that divert tubes from landfill disposal.
Methodology Notes
-
The CCI score represents cradle-to-grave emissions including manufacturing, transportation, use phase, and end-of-life disposal for one 100ml toothpaste tube.
-
Scope 3 emissions dominate the profile due to consumer water heating during brushing, which can vary dramatically based on regional energy sources and individual behavior patterns.
-
The functional unit assumes standard twice-daily brushing habits with approximately 30 seconds of water running per brushing session.
-
Fluoride and other active ingredient production emissions are estimated based on pharmaceutical manufacturing benchmarks due to limited specific data availability.
-
Regional variations in waste management infrastructure create significant uncertainty in end-of-life impact calculations, particularly for developing markets.
-
Transportation emissions assume average distribution distances but exclude last-mile delivery variations between retail and direct-to-consumer channels.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Suppipat et al. 2021 Journal of Cleaner Production — Study quantified manufacturing carbon footprint of traditional toothpaste tubes at 0.18 lb CO2e per 100ml tube.
- Martin et al. 2019 Environmental Science & Technology — Comparative analysis found toothpaste tablets generated higher environmental impact than cream formulations despite reduced packaging.
- Sealed Air 2018 Lifecycle Assessment Study — Research identified use phase as accounting for approximately 65% of total environmental impact in toothpaste lifecycle.
- JRC European Commission 2012 Ecolabel Criteria — Assessment revealed multilayer aluminum-plastic laminate construction makes toothpaste tubes nearly impossible to recycle effectively.
- Aspire Colorado 2024 Carbon Footprint Analysis — Study demonstrated consumer behavior during use can reduce carbon footprint by 57 times when using cold versus hot water.