Whiteboard Marker

Office Supplies
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

42 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

2,100 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 5.04 12%
Scope 2 3.36 8%
Scope 3 33.6 80%
Total 42 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
polyester production S3 35%
plastic material extraction and processing S3 28%
end-of-life disposal (landfill methane) S3 17%
ink production and solvents S3 12%
transportation and distribution S2 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2024)

Material Composition Assumptions

A typical dry-erase whiteboard marker weighs approximately 20 grams and consists of several key components. The plastic casing represents the largest material portion at roughly 12 grams or 60 percent of total weight, manufactured from either polypropylene or polystyrene depending on the brand. The polyester marker tip and internal ink reservoir system accounts for approximately 4 grams or 20 percent of the product mass. The remaining 4 grams comprise the ink formulation itself, which contains volatile organic compounds, xylene-based solvents, color pigments, and various chemical fragrances. This material breakdown forms the foundation for calculating upstream emissions from raw material extraction and processing activities.

Manufacturing Geography

Whiteboard markers are predominantly manufactured in China, where the majority of global plastic writing instrument production occurs. Chinese manufacturing facilities benefit from established supply chains for petrochemical feedstocks and specialized polymer processing equipment. The carbon intensity of the Chinese electrical grid averages 555 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour, which significantly influences the emissions profile during energy-intensive polymerization and molding processes. This relatively high grid intensity compared to regions with cleaner electricity sources contributes to elevated Scope 2 emissions in the overall product footprint.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2/kWh42Baseline
European Union275 gCO2/kWh38-9.5%
United States386 gCO2/kWh40-4.8%
India708 gCO2/kWh45+7.1%
Japan324 gCO2/kWh39-7.1%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Supplier-specific electricity consumption data and renewable energy procurement percentages for manufacturing facilities
  2. Material composition specifications including exact plastic resin types, recycled content percentages, and ink formulation details
  3. Transportation mode and distance documentation from raw material suppliers to manufacturing sites and from factories to distribution centers
  4. End-of-life management programs including take-back initiatives, recycling partnerships, or refillable marker system implementations
  5. Volatile organic compound emission measurements from production processes and finished product testing protocols

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Desklib Student Study, Whiteboard Marker LCA Comparison — Comparative lifecycle assessment revealing significant disparities between marker types and their environmental footprints.
  2. UC Berkeley Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment 2022 — Comprehensive analysis of volatile organic compound emissions from dry-erase writing instruments.
  3. ShunWaste 2025 Environmental Impact Assessment — Study quantifying annual disposal volumes and recycling rates for office writing supplies in North America.
  4. Anderson & Anderson 2003 Toxicology Study — Research examining chemical composition and health impacts of marker ink formulations and solvents.
Scan a product in this category →