Double-Glazed Window

Building Materials
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

58 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

2.4 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 8.7 15%
Scope 2 2.9 5%
Scope 3 46.4 80%
Total 58 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
glass manufacturing and processing S3 40%
frame material production (aluminum > PVC > wood) S3 35%
operational heating/cooling demands S1/S2 13%
transportation and logistics S3 12%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China, Germany, Poland
Grid Intensity
574 gCO2/kWh (China National Grid 2023)

Material Composition Assumptions

A standard double-glazed window unit measuring 1.2m x 1.2m contains approximately 24 kilograms of materials distributed across several components. Glass panes comprise the largest portion at roughly 16 kilograms or 67% of total weight, consisting of two separate glass sheets with thermal coatings. The window frame accounts for 6 kilograms or 25% of materials, with composition varying significantly between aluminum, PVC, or wooden construction methods.

Inert gas filling between glass panes represents a minimal weight contribution of approximately 50 grams but provides crucial thermal performance benefits. Hardware components including hinges, locks, and weather sealing systems add roughly 1.5 kilograms or 6% of total materials. Thermal break materials and spacer systems contribute the remaining 500 grams, serving as critical barriers to heat transfer between interior and exterior surfaces.

Manufacturing Geography

Double-glazed window production concentrates primarily in China, Germany, and Poland due to established glass manufacturing infrastructure and proximity to major construction markets. China dominates global production with extensive float glass facilities and integrated supply chains supporting both domestic consumption and export operations. German manufacturers focus on premium energy-efficient products serving northern European markets with stringent thermal performance requirements.

The carbon intensity baseline reflects Chinese manufacturing conditions at 574 gCO2/kWh grid intensity, representing the highest volume production scenario. European production benefits from lower grid intensities but operates at smaller scales with higher labor costs. Transportation emissions vary significantly depending on final installation location relative to manufacturing sites.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China574 gCO2/kWh58.0Baseline
Germany420 gCO2/kWh52.3-9.8%
Poland715 gCO2/kWh64.2+10.7%
Turkey463 gCO2/kWh54.1-6.7%
United States386 gCO2/kWh50.8-12.4%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit verified embodied energy data for glass manufacturing processes including float glass production, cutting, and thermal coating application with third-party energy audit documentation.

  2. Provide frame material specifications with detailed composition analysis, recycled content percentages, and supplier-specific production energy consumption data validated by environmental product declarations.

  3. Document transportation logistics including shipping distances, modal split between truck/rail/maritime transport, and packaging material weights with carrier-verified fuel consumption records.

  4. Supply facility-specific electricity consumption data with renewable energy certificates, power purchase agreements, or local grid emission factor documentation covering the manufacturing period.

  5. Furnish end-of-life material recovery rates and recycling processes with third-party waste stream analysis demonstrating actual material separation and reprocessing outcomes.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Główczyński & Krause 2023 Scientific Reports — Quantified carbon footprint of argon-filled double-glazed windows at 94.7 kg CO2-eq per standard residential unit.
  2. Glass for Europe 2022 — Demonstrated that aluminum window frames generate approximately 30% higher environmental impact than PVC alternatives.
  3. Asif et al. 2021 Energies — Established wooden frames as the lowest embodied carbon option at 85 kg CO2e compared to uPVC and aluminum materials.
  4. Passer et al. 1998 Building and Environment — Found frame material selection more critical than glazing layer count for overall lifecycle carbon performance.
Scan a product in this category →