Bottled Wine (750ml)
Food & BeverageCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 18 | 15% | |
| Scope 2 | 14 | 12% | |
| Scope 3 | 88 | 73% | |
| Total | 120 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| glass bottle production and transportation | S3 | 40% |
| viticulture and field nitrogen fertilizer emissions | S3 | 25% |
| wine distribution and consumer transport | S3 | 20% |
| winemaking and bottling energy use | S1 | 10% |
| secondary packaging and closures | S3 | 5% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- Global (viticulture and bottling distributed)
- Grid Intensity
- 475 gCO2/kWh (global weighted average for wine producing regions - IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
The standard bottled wine assessment assumes a 750ml glass bottle containing liquid wine with standard closure and labeling. The glass bottle represents approximately 85% of packaging-related emissions and weighs between 400-600 grams depending on bottle style and thickness. Natural cork closures contribute roughly 4% of packaging emissions but achieve carbon negativity when forest carbon sequestration is included in the assessment boundary. Labels and capsules combined represent approximately 1% of total packaging impact. Secondary packaging materials include corrugated cardboard for case packaging. The liquid wine product itself consists primarily of fermented grape juice with minimal additives, though the agricultural production phase generates the majority of cradle-to-gate emissions before packaging considerations.
Manufacturing Geography
Wine production occurs globally with concentrated regions in Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and emerging markets. The manufacturing process involves both agricultural viticulture phases and industrial bottling operations that typically occur in different locations. European wine regions benefit from higher recycled glass content in bottle manufacturing and established lightweight bottle standards that reduce overall carbon intensity. The global weighted average grid intensity of 475 gCO2/kWh reflects the mixed renewable and fossil fuel energy sources across major wine producing regions, with significant variation between countries like France with lower grid intensity versus regions relying more heavily on coal-fired electricity generation.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| European Union | 295 gCO2/kWh | 105 | -13% (high recycled glass, lightweight bottles) |
| California, USA | 260 gCO2/kWh | 125 | +4% (lower recycling rates, heavier bottles) |
| Australia | 700 gCO2/kWh | 140 | +17% (coal-heavy grid, long distribution) |
| Chile | 450 gCO2/kWh | 110 | -8% (renewable energy, efficient viticulture) |
| South Africa | 900 gCO2/kWh | 155 | +29% (coal-dominated electricity) |
Provenance Override Guidance
-
Vineyard-specific data including nitrogen fertilizer application rates, organic or biodynamic certification status, and documented carbon sequestration practices in soil management.
-
Glass bottle specifications with actual weight measurements, recycled content percentage, and supplier-specific production emission factors for bottle manufacturing.
-
Winemaking facility energy consumption data showing renewable energy percentage, processing efficiency metrics, and measured emissions from fermentation processes.
-
Transportation documentation covering grape transport to winery, finished product distribution distances, and shipping method carbon intensities for primary distribution.
-
Packaging details including closure type with cork forest management certification, label material composition, and secondary packaging material specifications with end-of-life disposal methods.
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions including viticulture, winemaking, packaging production, and distribution to retail, excluding consumer use and disposal phases.
- Scope 1 emissions reflect direct fuel use in bottling facilities and winery operations including fermentation processes.
- Scope 2 covers electricity consumption for temperature control, bottling equipment, and facility operations during wine production and packaging.
- Scope 3 dominates due to upstream glass production, agricultural inputs including fertilizers, and transportation throughout the supply chain.
- The functional unit assumes a standard 750ml glass bottle with natural cork closure and paper labeling.
- Consumer transportation to purchase location and end-of-life disposal impacts are excluded from the assessment boundary.
- Significant data gaps exist around carbon sequestration in vineyard soils and regional variation in glass recycling infrastructure effectiveness.
Related Concepts
Sources
- Figueiredo et al. 2015 LCA Study Portugal — Comprehensive life cycle assessment of Portuguese wine production identifying viticulture as the dominant emission source.
- Nature 2024 Eco-innovation Minimizes Carbon Footprint — Research demonstrating emission reductions of 25-30% through innovative agricultural practices including constructed wetlands.
- Martins et al. 2018 Comparative Sustainability Assessment — Multi-regional comparison showing significant variation in wine carbon footprints based on production methods.
- Steenwerth et al. 2015 California Wine Viticulture — Analysis of nitrogen fertilizer impacts contributing 87-584 kg CO2e per ton of grapes in California vineyards.
- Jackson Family Wines 2023 Carbon Emissions Audit — Industry audit revealing packaging contributions of 40-90% to total wine product carbon footprint.
- Cork Quality Council 2022 Life Cycle Assessment Review — Assessment showing natural cork closures achieve negative carbon footprint when including biogenic carbon sequestration.
- Glass Packaging Institute 2023 Sustainability Data — Industry data confirming glass bottle production accounts for 40-50% of total bottled wine emissions.
- Intertek 2023 Frugalpac Comparative LCA Analysis — Comparative study demonstrating bag-in-box packaging produces eight times lower emissions than traditional glass bottles.