Wireless Charger
ElectronicsCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 4.16 | 8% | |
| Scope 2 | 7.8 | 15% | |
| Scope 3 | 40.04 | 77% | |
| Total | 52 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| use-phase electricity consumption | S3 | 48% |
| battery/circuit board production | S1 | 28% |
| raw material extraction (metals, plastics) | S1 | 18% |
| distribution and transportation | S3 | 4% |
| end-of-life and disposal | S3 | 2% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 555 gCO2/kWh (IEA 2023)
Material Composition Assumptions
This assessment assumes a typical wireless charger weighing approximately 250 grams with the following material breakdown:
- Plastic housing and insulation: 125g (50%) - primarily ABS or polycarbonate for durability and heat resistance
- Copper wire and coils: 50g (20%) - wound coils for electromagnetic induction charging functionality
- Silicon and ferrite inductive components: 37.5g (15%) - magnetic cores and power conversion elements
- Printed circuit board with integrated circuits: 25g (10%) - control electronics and semiconductor components
- Aluminum heat dissipation components: 12.5g (5%) - thermal management and structural elements
The material composition emphasizes electromagnetic components required for wireless power transfer, with substantial plastic housing to protect internal electronics and provide user safety.
Manufacturing Geography
Primary manufacturing occurs in China, which produces the majority of consumer electronics globally due to established supply chains and specialized component availability. The Chinese electricity grid operates at an average carbon intensity of 555 gCO2/kWh, reflecting the country’s mixed energy portfolio with significant coal dependence alongside growing renewable capacity. This manufacturing location choice stems from proximity to semiconductor fabs, metal processing facilities, and plastic component suppliers, enabling cost-effective integration of diverse material inputs required for wireless charging technology.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 555 gCO2/kWh | 52 | Baseline |
| South Korea | 436 gCO2/kWh | 48 | -8% |
| Germany | 311 gCO2/kWh | 43 | -17% |
| Costa Rica | 89 gCO2/kWh | 35 | -33% |
| Norway | 17 gCO2/kWh | 32 | -38% |
Provenance Override Guidance
Suppliers can submit the following data types to override the default CCI score with product-specific information:
- Manufacturing facility electricity source documentation showing renewable energy procurement contracts or on-site generation capacity
- Bill of materials with specific recycled content percentages for plastic housing, copper coils, and aluminum components
- Transportation logistics data including shipping distances, modes, and fuel efficiency for primary distribution routes
- Component supplier environmental product declarations for printed circuit boards, semiconductors, and magnetic materials
- End-of-life material recovery rates and recycling partnerships demonstrating improved disposal outcomes
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents total lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions for one wireless charger unit including manufacturing, distribution, use phase electricity consumption, and end-of-life disposal
- Scope 1 and 2 emissions primarily reflect direct manufacturing energy and facility operations, while Scope 3 dominates through upstream material extraction and downstream electricity consumption during product use
- Functional unit assumes three years of typical consumer usage patterns with daily charging cycles
- Assessment excludes packaging materials, retail infrastructure, and consumer travel to purchase locations
- Use phase calculations assume average global electricity grid mix, though actual emissions vary significantly based on regional energy sources
- Data gaps exist around specific semiconductor manufacturing processes and regional recycling infrastructure effectiveness
Related Concepts
Sources
- Bi et al. 2015 Applied Energy — Found that electricity consumption during device operation represents the primary environmental impact driver for electronic charging systems.
- Heo & Bae 2017 LCA Mobile Phone Charger — Demonstrated that raw material extraction phases contribute significantly more carbon emissions than manufacturing processes for charging devices.
- Fairphone 2022 Life Cycle Assessment — Showed that incorporating recycled materials into electronic device production can meaningfully reduce overall carbon footprints.
- Ericsson 2013 Life Cycle Assessment Smartphone — Established baseline methodologies for evaluating environmental impacts across mobile device accessory lifecycles.
- Yang et al. 2019 Power Bank LCA — Identified battery component manufacturing as a critical hotspot for portable charging device environmental impacts.
- Cordella 2021 Journal of Industrial Ecology — Quantified regional variations in electronic device carbon footprints based on local electricity grid carbon intensities.