Wireless Mouse

Electronics
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

4 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

57 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 0.2 5%
Scope 2 2.4 60%
Scope 3 1.4 35%
Total 4 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
Semiconductor IC manufacturing S3 35%
ABS plastic injection molding S2 25%
PCB fabrication S3 18%
Final assembly S2 12%
Transportation S3 10%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China, Taiwan, Malaysia
Grid Intensity
565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China weighted average)

Material Composition Assumptions

The CCI score assumes a standard wireless mouse weighing 70 grams with the following material breakdown:

The plastic housing dominates the physical mass but semiconductor components drive the majority of manufacturing emissions despite representing less than one-quarter of the total device weight.

Manufacturing Geography

The default CCI score reflects production primarily in China with secondary manufacturing in Taiwan and Malaysia, representing the actual geographic distribution of global wireless mouse production. China accounts for approximately 65% of global production volume, Taiwan handles 20% focused on high-tech components, Malaysia contributes 10%, and South Korea provides 5%.

These regions experience grid intensities ranging from 500 to 650 gCO2e per kilowatt-hour, with the weighted average of 565 gCO2e/kWh applied to the CCI calculation. The energy-intensive nature of semiconductor fabrication and plastic injection molding makes grid intensity a critical factor in determining the final carbon footprint.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
Taiwan500 gCO2e/kWh3.6-10%
Malaysia650 gCO2e/kWh4.2+5%
South Korea480 gCO2e/kWh3.5-12%
European manufacturing290 gCO2e/kWh2.8-30%
Coal-heavy regions780 gCO2e/kWh4.8+20%

Provenance Override Guidance

Suppliers can provide the following data types to override the default CCI score with product-specific calculations:

  1. Manufacturing location with specific facility addresses to determine accurate regional grid intensity factors
  2. Material composition breakdown by weight showing actual plastic types, electronic component specifications, and battery chemistry
  3. Primary material supplier locations for ABS plastic resin, semiconductor components, and printed circuit boards
  4. Production energy consumption data from injection molding, assembly operations, and testing procedures
  5. Transportation modes and distances from component suppliers to final assembly facilities

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Logitech (2021) — First company to implement carbon labeling for electronics products with LCA validated to ISO 14067:2018 by DEKRA. Gaming mouse CF: 7.86 kg CO2e (manufacturing 66%, transport 20%, use 8%, EoL 6%)
  2. Zhang et al. (2019) — Design, manufacture and sustainable analysis of biodegradable computer mouse using ABS vs PLA plastics. ABS mouse: 0.052 kg CO2e vs PLA: 0.016 kg CO2e. Manufacturing energy: ABS 0.885 MJ vs PLA 0.273 MJ
  3. Chang et al. (2022) — Life cycle assessment of a TV/VCR remote control showing similar small electronic devices. 57.9g device weight, 62% plastic composition primarily polystyrene. GWP results consistent across studies
  4. Henriksen et al. (2010) — Life cycle assessment consistency review of consumer electronics. GWP100 results for mouse devices range 5.5-8.8 kg CO2e. Electronics manufacturing hotspots: semiconductors and plastic components
  5. Siyer et al. (2022) — Sustainable electronics design prototype reducing environmental carbon impact by 60.2% through biodegradable PCB and component reuse. Traditional mouse baseline used for comparison
  6. TSMC/Taiwan Semiconductor (2024) — Semiconductor industry emissions in Taiwan: 10M metric tons CO2e for TSMC alone. Grid intensity 500-600 gCO2e/kWh for electronics manufacturing regions
Scan a product in this category →