Wool Overcoat

Apparel
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

48 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

32 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 5.76 12%
Scope 2 2.88 6%
Scope 3 39.36 82%
Total 48 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
sheep farming & enteric methane S3 50%
garment use phase (washing/laundry) S3 22%
yarn production & weaving/knitting S3 12%
wool scouring & processing S3 8%
garment assembly & transportation S3 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China
Grid Intensity
555 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024)

Wool Overcoat

A wool overcoat represents one of the most carbon-intensive garments in fashion, with emissions dominated by sheep farming activities and methane production from livestock digestion. The lengthy supply chain from pasture to finished garment creates multiple environmental impact stages, though the farming phase contributes the majority of total lifecycle emissions.

Material Composition Assumptions

A typical wool overcoat consists primarily of processed sheep wool fiber, with minor components including synthetic or natural fiber lining materials. The main garment body contains approximately 800-1000 grams of worsted wool fabric, representing roughly 85-90% of total material weight. Supporting materials include polyester or silk lining fabric weighing 100-150 grams, metal or horn buttons totaling 20-30 grams, and synthetic thread components under 10 grams. The wool processing method significantly influences environmental impact, with worsted wool requiring more intensive manufacturing than woollen processing techniques.

Manufacturing Geography

China dominates global wool garment manufacturing, processing raw wool imports from Australia, New Zealand, and other sheep-farming regions into finished overcoats. The country’s textile manufacturing infrastructure combines large-scale wool processing facilities with skilled garment assembly operations. China’s electricity grid remains heavily dependent on coal-fired power generation, contributing to elevated manufacturing emissions compared to regions with cleaner energy sources. This geographic concentration allows for efficient supply chain coordination but creates carbon intensity challenges due to grid composition and transportation distances from wool-producing regions.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China555 gCO2e/kWh48Baseline
Italy285 gCO2e/kWh44-8%
Turkey470 gCO2e/kWh47-2%
India700 gCO2e/kWh51+6%
United Kingdom245 gCO2e/kWh43-10%

Provenance Override Guidance

  1. Submit verified wool origin documentation specifying sheep farm location, breed, and pasture management practices including methane mitigation measures.

  2. Provide detailed manufacturing facility energy consumption records with renewable energy certificates or grid electricity source verification.

  3. Document wool processing method specification including scouring chemicals used, water consumption per kilogram, and waste treatment procedures.

  4. Supply transportation records covering wool shipment from farm to processing facility, including mode of transport and distances traveled.

  5. Furnish garment assembly facility certifications for energy efficiency, waste reduction programs, and any circular economy initiatives for textile waste.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Wiedemann, Biggs, Nebel et al. 2020 Int J Life Cycle Assess — Comprehensive lifecycle assessment showing sheep farming contributes approximately half of total wool garment emissions.
  2. Henry, Russell, Ledgard et al. 2015 Handbook LCA Textiles — Detailed analysis revealing enteric methane from sheep digestion represents over three-quarters of farming-stage greenhouse gas emissions.
  3. Scazzosi, Brandino, Recchioni 2023 J Cleaner Production — Study demonstrating that garment lifetime extension by six-fold dramatically reduces per-wear environmental impacts.
  4. Liu et al. 2024 J Cleaner Production — Research indicating recycled wool fibers can achieve sixty percent impact reduction compared to virgin materials.
  5. Carbonfact 2025 Carbon Footprint Analysis — Analysis confirming wool processing requires substantial water inputs and energy-intensive scouring operations.
Scan a product in this category →