Wool Sweater
ApparelCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-08
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 21.5 | 67% | |
| Scope 2 | 4.2 | 13% | |
| Scope 3 | 6.3 | 20% | |
| Total | 32 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Sheep farming and wool production | S3 | 67% |
| Wool scouring and processing | S1 | 13% |
| Yarn spinning and knitting | S2 | 13% |
| Garment finishing and assembly | S1 | 5% |
| Transportation and packaging | S3 | 2% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- China
- Grid Intensity
- 581 gCO2e/kWh (Ember 2024, China)
Material Composition Assumptions
The default wool sweater assessed is a lightweight pullover weighing 300 grams total, containing 85% virgin merino wool (255g) and 15% recycled polyester fibers (45g) for structure and durability. The wool originates from sheep farms in Australia or New Zealand, representing the highest quality merino wool commonly used in apparel manufacturing. The polyester component consists of recycled content to reduce virgin polymer requirements. Additional materials include natural dyes (5g), buttons and fasteners (10g), and packaging materials (15g cardboard, 5g plastic).
Manufacturing Geography
The default manufacturing region is China, which processes approximately 60% of global wool into finished garments. Chinese textile facilities typically operate with an electricity grid carbon intensity of 581 gCO2e/kWh as of 2024, reflecting the nation’s coal-dominated power generation mix. China’s dominance in wool processing stems from established infrastructure for scouring raw wool, spinning yarn, knitting fabric, and garment assembly. Major production centers include Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shandong provinces, where integrated textile complexes handle the full supply chain from raw wool to finished products.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 581 gCO2e/kWh | 32 kgCO2e | Baseline |
| India | 713 gCO2e/kWh | 35 kgCO2e | +9% |
| Turkey | 415 gCO2e/kWh | 29 kgCO2e | -9% |
| Italy | 285 gCO2e/kWh | 26 kgCO2e | -19% |
| United Kingdom | 225 gCO2e/kWh | 24 kgCO2e | -25% |
Provenance Override Guidance
- Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) containing verified cradle-to-gate carbon footprint data for the specific wool sweater model, certified under ISO 14040/14044 standards
- Wool source certification documenting the geographic origin of wool fiber with associated farm-level emissions data, including methane emissions from sheep digestion and land management practices
- Manufacturing facility energy data providing actual electricity consumption, renewable energy usage, and process-specific fuel consumption for wool scouring, spinning, knitting, and finishing operations
- Transportation documentation covering logistics from wool farms to processing facilities to final assembly, including shipping modes, distances, and packaging requirements
- Chemical input specifications detailing quantities and types of dyes, finishing chemicals, and auxiliary materials used in processing with associated emissions factors
Methodology Notes
- The CCI score represents cradle-to-gate emissions for one 300g wool sweater including all upstream materials, processing, and manufacturing through final assembly
- Scope 1 emissions primarily stem from fuel combustion during wool scouring and garment finishing processes, representing direct facility emissions
- Scope 2 emissions reflect electricity consumption for mechanical processing including carding, spinning, knitting, and assembly operations based on regional grid carbon intensity
- Scope 3 emissions are dominated by upstream wool production including sheep farming, where methane emissions from digestion contribute significantly to the total footprint
- Functional unit definition covers one complete garment ready for retail distribution, excluding consumer use phase, washing, and end-of-life disposal
- Key data gaps include regional variations in farming practices, precise energy requirements for different wool processing technologies, and transportation distances in global supply chains
- The wool industry faces particular challenges in emissions allocation between co-products including meat, milk, and wool from sheep farming systems
Related Concepts
Sources
- Wiedemann et al., Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment — Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2020, first full cradle-to-grave LCA of 300g wool sweater
- IWTO Life Cycle Assessment of Wool — 2020-2025, comprehensive wool LCA methodology and industry findings
- Carbonfact wool emissions analysis — 2025, 80.3 kg CO2e per kg wool fiber carbon footprint assessment
- Ecoinvent 3.1 wool dataset — LCA database for raw wool production, scouring and carding processes
- BSR Apparel Industry Life Cycle Carbon Mapping — 2009, wool sweater use phase and processing energy analysis