Cotton T-Shirt
ApparelCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.4 | 5% | |
| Scope 2 | 1.4 | 17% | |
| Scope 3 | 6.3 | 78% | |
| Total | 8.1 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Cotton fiber cultivation (irrigation, fertilizer, pesticides) | S3 | 30% |
| Dyeing and wet processing | S2 | 22% |
| Yarn spinning | S2 | 15% |
| Finishing, packaging, and transport | S3 | 13% |
| Fabric knitting/weaving | S3 | 12% |
| Garment assembly (cut-make-trim) | S1 | 8% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- Bangladesh, India, China
- Grid Intensity
- 620–700 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, Bangladesh/India)
Product Profile
The cotton T-shirt is a single-layer knit garment weighing approximately 250 g, made from conventional (non-organic) cotton. This is the most produced garment type globally, with an estimated 2 billion units manufactured annually.
At 8.1 kgCO2e per unit, this is a conservative estimate assuming worst-case plausible conditions: conventional cotton grown in water-intensive regions, dyed with conventional reactive dyes, and manufactured on high-carbon grids.
The Cotton Supply Chain
Unlike electronics where semiconductors dominate, apparel emissions are spread more evenly across the supply chain:
- Cotton cultivation (30% of total): Field emissions from irrigation energy, nitrogen fertilizer application (producing N2O, a potent GHG), and pesticide production. Conventional cotton uses ~150-200 kg N fertilizer per hectare.
- Dyeing and wet processing (22%): The most energy-intensive stage of garment manufacturing. Heating large volumes of water for dye baths, washing, and finishing consumes significant thermal energy, often from coal or natural gas boilers.
- Yarn spinning (15%): Ring spinning or open-end spinning of cotton fibers into yarn. Electricity-intensive process typically powered by the local grid.
- Fabric production (12%): Circular knitting for jersey T-shirt fabric. Lower energy than weaving but still significant at scale.
Organic Cotton Comparison
Organic cotton reduces field-level emissions by eliminating synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, but the net benefit is smaller than commonly assumed:
- Organic cotton typically yields 20-30% less per hectare, requiring more land
- Reduced fertilizer eliminates N2O emissions but organic alternatives have their own footprint
- Net reduction estimated at 15-25% on the cultivation phase, or roughly 5-8% on total garment footprint
This is not reflected in the default score. Suppliers using certified organic cotton may submit evidence for a provenance override.
Provenance Override
Brands may override the default score by submitting:
- Verified organic cotton certification (GOTS, OCS)
- Factory energy audits showing renewable energy use
- Bluesign or OEKO-TEX certification for wet processing
- ISO 14067-compliant PCF covering the full garment supply chain
Related Products
Related Concepts
Sources
- Levi Strauss & Co. — Life Cycle Assessment of a Levi's 501 jean (extended to T-shirt by material weight adjustment). Original LCA published 2015, updated 2019.
- Cotton Incorporated — Life Cycle Assessment of Cotton Fiber & Fabric, 2016. Field-to-fabric LCA of US and global cotton.
- Sandin et al. (2019) — Environmental assessment of Swedish clothing consumption. Mistra Future Fashion report, peer-reviewed.
- Quantis (2018) — Measuring Fashion: Environmental Impact of the Global Apparel and Footwear Industries. Commissioned by the Global Fashion Agenda.
- IEA — Emissions Factors 2024. Bangladesh and India grid intensities for textile mill Scope 2.