Cotton T-Shirt

Apparel
High Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

8.1 kgCO₂e / per unit (250g)

Per kg

33 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 0.4 5%
Scope 2 1.4 17%
Scope 3 6.3 78%
Total 8.1 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
Cotton fiber cultivation (irrigation, fertilizer, pesticides) S3 30%
Dyeing and wet processing S2 22%
Yarn spinning S2 15%
Finishing, packaging, and transport S3 13%
Fabric knitting/weaving S3 12%
Garment assembly (cut-make-trim) S1 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
Bangladesh, India, China
Grid Intensity
620–700 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, Bangladesh/India)

Product Profile

The cotton T-shirt is a single-layer knit garment weighing approximately 250 g, made from conventional (non-organic) cotton. This is the most produced garment type globally, with an estimated 2 billion units manufactured annually.

At 8.1 kgCO2e per unit, this is a conservative estimate assuming worst-case plausible conditions: conventional cotton grown in water-intensive regions, dyed with conventional reactive dyes, and manufactured on high-carbon grids.

The Cotton Supply Chain

Unlike electronics where semiconductors dominate, apparel emissions are spread more evenly across the supply chain:

  1. Cotton cultivation (30% of total): Field emissions from irrigation energy, nitrogen fertilizer application (producing N2O, a potent GHG), and pesticide production. Conventional cotton uses ~150-200 kg N fertilizer per hectare.
  2. Dyeing and wet processing (22%): The most energy-intensive stage of garment manufacturing. Heating large volumes of water for dye baths, washing, and finishing consumes significant thermal energy, often from coal or natural gas boilers.
  3. Yarn spinning (15%): Ring spinning or open-end spinning of cotton fibers into yarn. Electricity-intensive process typically powered by the local grid.
  4. Fabric production (12%): Circular knitting for jersey T-shirt fabric. Lower energy than weaving but still significant at scale.

Organic Cotton Comparison

Organic cotton reduces field-level emissions by eliminating synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, but the net benefit is smaller than commonly assumed:

This is not reflected in the default score. Suppliers using certified organic cotton may submit evidence for a provenance override.

Provenance Override

Brands may override the default score by submitting:

Related Products

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Levi Strauss & Co. — Life Cycle Assessment of a Levi's 501 jean (extended to T-shirt by material weight adjustment). Original LCA published 2015, updated 2019.
  2. Cotton Incorporated — Life Cycle Assessment of Cotton Fiber & Fabric, 2016. Field-to-fabric LCA of US and global cotton.
  3. Sandin et al. (2019) — Environmental assessment of Swedish clothing consumption. Mistra Future Fashion report, peer-reviewed.
  4. Quantis (2018) — Measuring Fashion: Environmental Impact of the Global Apparel and Footwear Industries. Commissioned by the Global Fashion Agenda.
  5. IEA — Emissions Factors 2024. Bangladesh and India grid intensities for textile mill Scope 2.