Cotton T-Shirt (Conventional)

Apparel
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

10 kgCO₂e / per unit

Per kg

50 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 0.3 3%
Scope 2 1.9 19%
Scope 3 7.8 78%
Total 10 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
Dyeing, finishing, and wet processing S3 28%
Cotton cultivation (fertilizer N2O, irrigation energy) S3 25%
Yarn spinning and fabric knitting/weaving S3 22%
Garment assembly and factory electricity S2 17%
Transport, packaging, and distribution S3 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
Bangladesh, India, China
Grid Intensity
708 gCO2e/kWh (Ember 2025, India); 565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China)

Material Composition Assumptions

The default reference garment is a conventional cotton t-shirt weighing approximately 200 g, composed of:

Cotton cultivation is assumed to be irrigated conventional farming with synthetic nitrogen fertilizer application. Nitrogen fertilizer is the primary driver of field-level emissions through direct and indirect N2O releases, which have a global warming potential approximately 265 times that of CO2.

Manufacturing Geography

The default manufacturing region is a blended South and East Asia scenario: cotton is grown in India, the USA, or West Africa, ginned and spun locally or in India/Pakistan, with fabric knitting, dyeing, and garment assembly in Bangladesh, India, or China.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
India (default)~708 gCO2e/kWh10.0 kgCO2eBaseline
China~565 gCO2e/kWh9.4 kgCO2e-6%
Bangladesh~580 gCO2e/kWh9.5 kgCO2e-5%
EU (Portugal, Turkey)~300 gCO2e/kWh8.2 kgCO2e-18%
USA~390 gCO2e/kWh8.6 kgCO2e-14%

Note: Scope 2 (factory electricity and thermal energy) represents approximately 19% of the total footprint. Grid intensity variation has a moderate effect because Scope 3 upstream emissions (cotton farming, yarn spinning at supplier sites, chemical production) dominate the total score. Regional variation in agricultural practices (irrigation vs. rainfed, fertilizer intensity) can also shift Scope 3 emissions significantly.

Provenance Override Guidance

A supplier or brand may override the default CCI score by submitting:

  1. Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) or Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) certified by an accredited third party per ISO 14067, PAS 2050, or the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method.
  2. Cotton sourcing data specifying origin country, farming system (conventional, Better Cotton Initiative, organic), and whether irrigated or rainfed. Organic cotton from rainfed systems can reduce the cultivation hotspot by 30-50%.
  3. Mill-level energy data for spinning, knitting/weaving, and dyeing facilities, including fuel mix (natural gas vs. coal for steam generation) and any renewable energy procurement.
  4. Chemical and dye process data specifying dye class (reactive, vat, pigment), liquor ratio, and number of wash cycles. Low-liquor-ratio dyeing equipment can reduce wet processing energy by 30-40%.
  5. Transport mode and distance data for finished goods distribution to point of sale.

Brands participating in the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC) Higg Index and providing Higg FEM (Facility Environmental Module) verified data qualify for provenance override consideration.

Methodology Notes

Product Deep Dives

Related Concepts

Related Categories

Sources

  1. Li et al. (2016) — Carbon Footprint of textile throughout its life cycle: A case study of Chinese cotton shirts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 464-475. Reports 8.77 kgCO2e per cotton shirt across full lifecycle.
  2. BSR (2009) — Apparel Industry Life Cycle Carbon Mapping. Identifies fabric production (33%), yarn preparation (22%), and resin/raw material production (15%) as top emission categories for cotton textiles.
  3. Yan et al. (2025) — Carbon footprint of global cotton production. Science of the Total Environment. Reports average cotton cultivation emissions of 0.9 tCO2e per tonne of seed cotton, or approximately 1.9 kgCO2e per kg of cotton fiber.
  4. Ember (2025) — Global Electricity Review 2025. India grid carbon intensity 708 gCO2/kWh (2024); China grid intensity 565 gCO2/kWh. Used for Scope 2 estimates in primary manufacturing regions.
  5. ILO (2023) — Taking climate action: Measuring carbon emissions in the garment sector in Asia. Provides emissions benchmarking data for garment manufacturing in Bangladesh and other Asian countries.
  6. Li et al. (2024) — Carbon-water-energy footprint impacts of dyed cotton fabric production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. Reports dyeing of 1 tonne of cotton knitted fabric emits approximately 7505 kgCO2eq, with energy accounting for the largest proportion.
Scan a product in this category →