Lithium-Ion Battery Cell

Energy
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

73 kgCO₂e / per kWh capacity

Per kg

73 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 8 11%
Scope 2 22 30%
Scope 3 43 59%
Total 73 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
Cathode material production (NMC/LFP) S3 30%
Cell manufacturing (electrode coating, formation cycling) S2 25%
Mineral extraction (lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese) S3 15%
Anode material (graphite mining and processing) S3 12%
Cell assembly, formation, aging, and quality testing S1 10%
Electrolyte and separator production S3 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China (CATL, BYD — Fujian, Shenzhen), South Korea (LG, Samsung SDI)
Grid Intensity
565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China average)

Product Profile

The lithium-ion battery cell is the fundamental building block of modern energy storage — powering smartphones, laptops, EVs, and grid storage systems. This profile covers a generic cylindrical or pouch cell with NMC (nickel-manganese-cobalt) or LFP (lithium iron phosphate) chemistry.

At 73 kgCO2e per kWh, this is a conservative estimate using IVL (2019) methodology and China-weighted manufacturing assumptions. Published estimates range widely from 40-120 kgCO2e/kWh depending on chemistry, factory location, and energy source.

Chemistry Matters

The cathode chemistry is the single largest variable in battery carbon footprint:

The CCI default assumes NMC chemistry as the worst-case plausible, which is consistent with the conservative-first methodology.

Why Manufacturing Location Dominates Scope 2

Cell manufacturing is extraordinarily energy-intensive. The electrode coating, drying, formation cycling (initial charge-discharge to activate the cell), and aging steps require controlled environments with precise temperature and humidity. A single gigafactory can consume 100+ GWh of electricity annually.

When that electricity comes from China’s coal-heavy grid (565 gCO2e/kWh), Scope 2 emissions are substantial. The same factory powered by Nordic hydroelectric (30 gCO2e/kWh) would see Scope 2 reduced by ~95%. This is why companies like Northvolt (Sweden) and Tesla (Nevada, with solar) emphasize factory location as a decarbonization lever.

The Range Problem

The 40-120 kgCO2e/kWh range in the literature reflects genuine uncertainty, not just methodology differences:

Medium confidence reflects this genuine uncertainty.

Provenance Override

Battery manufacturers may override the default score with:

Related Products

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Dai et al. (2019) — Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications. Batteries, 5(2), 48. doi:10.3390/batteries5020048
  2. Kelly et al. (2020) — Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from Lithium-Ion Battery Manufacturing. Argonne National Laboratory, GREET model updates.
  3. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute — The Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Lithium-Ion Batteries, 2019 update. Reports 61-106 kgCO2e/kWh.
  4. CATL — Environmental, Social and Governance Report 2023. Self-reported manufacturing energy and emissions data.
  5. IEA — Emissions Factors 2024. Grid intensities for China, South Korea used for cell manufacturing Scope 2.