Food Packaging -- Plastics (PET, HDPE, PP)
PackagingCarbon Cost Index Score
Per kg
Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07
Scope Breakdown
| Scope | kgCO₂e | % of Total | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 | 0.7 | 21% | |
| Scope 2 | 0.9 | 26% | |
| Scope 3 | 1.8 | 53% | |
| Total | 3.4 | 100% |
Emission Hotspots
| Emission Hotspot | Scope | Est. % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Feedstock extraction and cracking (naphtha/ethane to monomers) | S3 | 35% |
| Electricity for extrusion, blow molding, thermoforming | S2 | 22% |
| Polymerization and resin pellet production | S1 | 20% |
| Additives, colorants, and compounding | S3 | 12% |
| Transport of resin pellets and finished packaging | S3 | 11% |
Manufacturing Geography
- Region
- Global (weighted: Asia, Europe, North America)
- Grid Intensity
- 565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China); 300 gCO2e/kWh (EU avg)
Material Composition Assumptions
The default reference is 1 kg of virgin food-grade plastic packaging, modeled as a weighted blend of the three most common food-contact polymers:
- PET (polyethylene terephthalate): Bottles, clamshells, thermoformed trays — approximately 40% of food packaging plastic by mass. Virgin PET resin has a GWP of approximately 2.23 kgCO2e/kg at the resin pellet stage, rising to approximately 3.0-3.5 kgCO2e/kg after conversion (blow molding, thermoforming).
- HDPE (high-density polyethylene): Milk jugs, cereal box liners, rigid containers — approximately 30% of food packaging plastic. Virgin HDPE resin at approximately 1.8-2.6 kgCO2e/kg depending on system boundary.
- PP (polypropylene): Yogurt cups, microwaveable containers, bottle caps — approximately 30% of food packaging plastic. Virgin PP resin at approximately 1.6-2.0 kgCO2e/kg.
The blended CCI score of 3.4 kgCO2e/kg represents virgin resin through conversion into finished packaging (cradle-to-gate), including feedstock extraction, cracking, polymerization, and conversion processes (extrusion, molding, thermoforming). This value is conservative; cradle-to-resin-pellet values are lower (approximately 1.6-2.6 kgCO2e/kg) but exclude conversion energy.
All polymers are assumed to be 100% virgin. Inclusion of recycled content (post-consumer or post-industrial) would reduce the score, with recycled PET showing approximately 50-75% lower GWP than virgin PET.
Manufacturing Geography
The default manufacturing scenario assumes a global weighted average reflecting major production regions:
- Grid intensity (China): 565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA Emissions Factors 2024). China is the world’s largest producer of plastic packaging.
- Grid intensity (EU): ~300 gCO2e/kWh (average). Europe is a major producer with more moderate grid carbon intensity.
- Grid intensity (USA): ~390 gCO2e/kWh (EPA eGRID 2024).
- Rationale: Feedstock extraction and cracking (Scope 3) dominate the footprint at approximately 35%, and these emissions are relatively insensitive to grid mix since they are driven by petrochemical process energy (typically natural gas). However, the conversion step (extrusion, blow molding) is electricity-intensive, making grid carbon intensity relevant for Scope 2.
Regional Variation
| Manufacturing Region | Grid Intensity | Estimated CCI Score | Adjustment vs Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global weighted (default) | ~450 gCO2e/kWh | 3.4 kgCO2e/kg | Baseline |
| China | ~565 gCO2e/kWh | 3.7 kgCO2e/kg | +9% |
| EU (average) | ~300 gCO2e/kWh | 3.1 kgCO2e/kg | -9% |
| USA | ~390 gCO2e/kWh | 3.3 kgCO2e/kg | -3% |
| Middle East (gas-based feedstock) | ~500 gCO2e/kWh | 3.0 kgCO2e/kg | -12% |
Note: The Middle East benefits from low-cost ethane feedstock (natural gas liquids), which has a lower cracking energy requirement than naphtha-based feedstock used in Europe and Asia. This reduces upstream Scope 3 emissions despite a moderate grid intensity.
Provenance Override Guidance
A supplier or brand may override the default CCI score by submitting:
- Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) or Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) certified per ISO 14067 or the EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, with system boundary specified (cradle-to-resin vs. cradle-to-gate including conversion).
- Resin sourcing data specifying polymer type, virgin vs. recycled content percentage, and feedstock origin (naphtha, ethane, or bio-based). Post-consumer recycled (PCR) PET at greater than 50% content can reduce the CCI score by 30-50%.
- Conversion facility energy data specifying electricity consumption per kg of output, fuel mix for any thermal processes, and renewable energy procurement (PPAs or RECs).
- Mass-balance or ISCC PLUS certification for bio-attributed or chemically recycled content, specifying the attribution methodology and chain-of-custody approach.
- Transport mode and distance data for resin pellet supply and finished packaging distribution.
Methodology Notes
- CCI score of 3.4 kgCO2e/kg represents a conservative estimate for virgin food-grade plastic packaging through conversion. Literature values for cradle-to-resin range from 1.6-2.6 kgCO2e/kg depending on polymer; conversion adds approximately 0.8-1.2 kgCO2e/kg for blow molding and thermoforming processes.
- Scope breakdown: Scope 3 dominates at 53% (1.8 kgCO2e/kg), driven by upstream feedstock extraction, naphtha cracking, and additive production. Scope 2 (electricity for conversion machinery) is 26% (0.9 kgCO2e/kg). Scope 1 (direct process emissions from polymerization, on-site combustion) is 21% (0.7 kgCO2e/kg).
- Functional unit: 1 kg of finished food-grade plastic packaging, cradle-to-gate. The gate is the finished packaging item ready for filling.
- Use-phase and end-of-life emissions are excluded. Incineration of 1 kg of plastic packaging releases approximately 2.0-3.1 kgCO2e depending on polymer carbon content. Landfill emissions are minimal in the short term but represent foregone material value.
- Data gaps: Conversion energy varies widely by packaging format (thin film vs. rigid container vs. bottle). The estimate uses a moderate conversion energy assumption. Specific packaging formats would benefit from format-specific LCA data.
Product Deep Dives
Related Concepts
Related Categories
Sources
- NAPCOR / Franklin Associates (2020) — Life Cycle Inventory of 100% Postconsumer HDPE and PET Recycled Resin. Reports virgin PET Global Warming Potential of 2.23 kgCO2e/kg and virgin HDPE at approximately 1.8-2.0 kgCO2e/kg for cradle-to-resin-pellet system boundary.
- APR / Franklin Associates (2018) — Life Cycle Impacts for Postconsumer Recycled Resins: PET, HDPE, and PP. Reports cradle-to-resin GWP for virgin PET (2.23 kgCO2e/kg), virgin HDPE (1.83 kgCO2e/kg), and virgin PP (1.58 kgCO2e/kg). Recycled resins show 50-75% lower GWP.
- PlasticsEurope Eco-profiles (2014-2022) — European industry-average Life Cycle Inventory datasets for major polymer families. Reports cradle-to-gate GWP for HDPE granulate at approximately 1.8-2.0 kgCO2e/kg and PP granulate at approximately 1.6-2.0 kgCO2e/kg for European production.
- EEA / ETC WMGE (2021) — Greenhouse gas emissions and natural capital implications of plastics (including biobased plastics). Reports production-phase emissions for fossil-based plastics ranging from 1.9 to 5.7 kgCO2e/kg depending on polymer type and system boundary.
- Pauer et al. (2024) — Replacing Plastics with Alternatives Is Worse for Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Most Cases. PMC. Fossil-based HDPE at 2.6 kgCO2e/kg including conversion steps. Confirms that plastic packaging generally has lower weight-normalized carbon intensity than glass or aluminum alternatives.