PET Plastic Bottle (500 ml)

Packaging
High Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

0.18 kgCO₂e / per bottle (30g)

Per kg

6 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 0.04 22%
Scope 2 0.03 17%
Scope 3 0.11 61%
Total 0.18 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
PET resin production (PTA + MEG polymerization) S3 40%
Preform injection molding S2 18%
Petrochemical feedstock extraction (crude oil / naphtha) S3 15%
Stretch blow molding S2 12%
Cap and label production S3 8%
Packaging and transport S3 7%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
Global average (PET resin production and bottle blowing)
Grid Intensity
Process-dominant; PET resin ~2.2 kgCO2e/kg from petrochemical feedstock

Product Profile

The 500 ml PET (polyethylene terephthalate) bottle is the dominant single-serve beverage container globally. A standard bottle weighs approximately 30 g (including cap and label). Global production exceeds 500 billion PET bottles annually.

At 0.18 kgCO2e per bottle (assuming 100% virgin PET), this is the lowest per-unit embodied carbon of the common beverage containers. PET’s low weight per volume is the primary reason for its carbon efficiency.

Why PET Has Low Per-Unit Emissions

PET bottles benefit from three structural advantages:

However, per-kilogram emissions (~6 kgCO2e/kg) are moderate — the low per-unit score is primarily a function of weight, not material efficiency.

The Petrochemical Feedstock Question

PET is derived from petroleum via purified terephthalic acid (PTA) and monoethylene glycol (MEG). The petrochemical processing chain accounts for ~55% of total emissions. Unlike aluminum smelting, where the process chemistry generates direct CO2, PET’s emissions are primarily energy-related — the cracking, distillation, and polymerization steps consume significant thermal energy.

This means that bio-based PET (from plant-derived MEG or PTA) can potentially reduce feedstock emissions by 20-40%. However, bio-PET remains a small fraction of total production and is not reflected in the default score.

Recycled PET (rPET)

Recycled PET reduces emissions by approximately 30-50% compared to virgin:

Recycled ContentEstimated Score per Bottle
0% (virgin only)0.18 kgCO2e
25% rPET0.15 kgCO2e
50% rPET0.12 kgCO2e
100% rPET0.09 kgCO2e

Several major brands (Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Danone) have committed to 50%+ rPET content by 2030. Actual global average recycled content is estimated at 10-15%.

End-of-Life Note

The CCI does not include end-of-life emissions in the default score. For PET, end-of-life is particularly complex: bottles that are recycled avoid virgin production (a credit), while those landfilled or incinerated generate additional emissions. The global PET bottle collection rate is approximately 50%, with significant regional variation (>90% in Germany/Norway, <30% in many developing countries).

Provenance Override

Bottle manufacturers and beverage brands may override the default score by:

Related Products

Related Concepts

Sources

  1. Franklin Associates (2018) — Life Cycle Inventory of U.S. Plastics Production and Disposal. Comprehensive dataset for PET production and bottle manufacturing.
  2. NAPCOR — National Association for PET Container Resources. PET recycling rate data and industry environmental profiles.
  3. PlasticsEurope — Eco-profiles and Environmental Product Declarations for PET. European resin production data, 2021.
  4. Shen et al. (2011) — Open-loop recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
  5. IEA — Emissions Factors 2024. Grid intensities for bottle manufacturing Scope 2.