Synthetic Footwear (Athletic / Sneaker)

Footwear
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

14 kgCO₂e / per pair

Per kg

18 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 0.4 3%
Scope 2 3.6 26%
Scope 3 10 71%
Total 14 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
Rubber and EVA/PU sole manufacturing (vulcanization, injection molding) S3 28%
Polyester/nylon upper material production (petrochemical feedstock) S3 25%
Shoe assembly (lasting, cementing, finishing) S2 22%
Transport, packaging, and distribution S3 13%
Dyeing and material finishing S3 12%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China, Vietnam, Indonesia
Grid Intensity
565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China); 480 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, Vietnam)

Material Composition Assumptions

The default reference product is a pair of athletic sneakers weighing approximately 0.75 kg, composed of:

Synthetic footwear is heavily petroleum-dependent. The upper, midsole, outsole, and adhesives are all derived from petrochemical feedstocks, making the material production stage the dominant emission driver.

Manufacturing Geography

The default manufacturing scenario is based on Southeast and East Asian production: material production in China, South Korea, and Taiwan, with shoe assembly in Vietnam, China, and Indonesia.

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated CCI ScoreAdjustment vs Default
China (default)~565 gCO2e/kWh14.0 kgCO2eBaseline
Vietnam~480 gCO2e/kWh13.4 kgCO2e-4%
Indonesia~720 gCO2e/kWh15.1 kgCO2e+8%
EU (Portugal, Romania)~300 gCO2e/kWh12.1 kgCO2e-14%
USA~390 gCO2e/kWh12.7 kgCO2e-9%

Note: Scope 2 represents approximately 26% of total emissions for synthetic footwear, making grid intensity a moderately important factor. Material production (Scope 3 upstream) is the largest contributor and is relatively independent of assembly location.

Provenance Override Guidance

A supplier or brand may override the default CCI score by submitting:

  1. Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) or Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) per ISO 14067 covering materials through finished shoe.
  2. Material composition data specifying recycled content. Recycled polyester uppers can reduce material-stage emissions by 30-40%. Bio-based EVA (sugarcane-derived) can reduce midsole emissions.
  3. Factory energy data from Tier 1 assembly and Tier 2 material suppliers, including renewable energy procurement (PPAs, RECs/GOs).
  4. Higg FEM verified data from SAC-participating facilities.
  5. Sole material data: Natural rubber from certified sustainable sources or recycled rubber can reduce sole-stage emissions.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Related Categories

Sources

  1. Cheah et al. (2013) — Drivers of Variability in Life Cycle Assessments of Consumer Electronics and Footwear. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1135-1148. Reviews multiple footwear LCA studies and identifies manufacturing and material production as key emission drivers.
  2. FDRA / Quantis (2013) — Footwear Industry LCA Guidance. Prepared for the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America. Provides benchmark cradle-to-gate emissions for athletic footwear of approximately 11-14 kgCO2e per pair.
  3. MIT Materials Systems Laboratory (2013) — Sustainability in the sneaker supply chain. Analysis of athletic shoe manufacturing showing approximately 30% of emissions from materials and 25% from manufacturing processes.
  4. Quantis (2018) — Measuring Fashion: Environmental Impact of the Global Apparel and Footwear Industries. Provides sector-wide emissions data for synthetic footwear across major manufacturing countries.
  5. IEA (2024) — Emissions Factors 2024. Grid carbon intensities: China 565 gCO2e/kWh, Vietnam 480 gCO2e/kWh, Indonesia 720 gCO2e/kWh.
Scan a product in this category →