Shipping Packaging — Foam (EPS/EPP)

Packaging
Medium Confidence

Carbon Cost Index Score

4 kgCO₂e / per kg

Per kg

3.5 kgCO₂e / kg

Methodology v1.0 · Last reviewed 2026-04-07

Scope Breakdown

Scope kgCO₂e % of Total Distribution
Scope 1 0.3 9%
Scope 2 0.7 20%
Scope 3 2.5 71%
Total 3.5 100%

Emission Hotspots

Emission Hotspot Scope Est. % of Total
Styrene monomer production (petrochemical feedstock) S3 40%
Polymerization and bead expansion (steam, pentane blowing agent) S1 20%
Molding and shape cutting (steam injection, electricity) S2 18%
Transport and distribution S3 14%
Pentane emissions (VOC, indirect GHG contribution) S1 8%

Manufacturing Geography

Region
China, USA, EU (Germany, Poland)
Grid Intensity
565 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, China); 390 gCO2e/kWh (IEA 2024, USA)

Material Composition Assumptions

The default reference product is 1 kg of molded expanded polystyrene (EPS) packaging, composed of:

EPS packaging is approximately 95-98% air by volume. Typical density for packaging-grade EPS is 15-30 kg/m3. The extreme lightness means that per-kg emissions are relatively high, but per-unit-volume emissions are very low — which is why EPS remains widely used for protective packaging despite environmental concerns.

Expanded polypropylene (EPP) is an alternative foam packaging material with similar properties but different chemistry. EPP has slightly lower cradle-to-gate emissions (~3.0-3.2 kgCO2e/kg) and is more readily recyclable than EPS.

Manufacturing Geography

EPS production is moderately globalized, with conversion (molding) typically regional:

Regional Variation

Manufacturing RegionGrid IntensityEstimated Score (per kg)Adjustment vs Default
China (default)~565 gCO2e/kWh3.5 kgCO2eBaseline
USA~390 gCO2e/kWh3.2 kgCO2e-9%
EU average~300 gCO2e/kWh3.0 kgCO2e-14%
Germany~350 gCO2e/kWh3.1 kgCO2e-11%
Japan~460 gCO2e/kWh3.3 kgCO2e-6%

Note: Because Scope 3 (upstream petrochemical production) dominates at 71% of total emissions, grid intensity variation has a proportionally smaller effect on the total score.

Provenance Override Guidance

A supplier or manufacturer may override the default CCI score by submitting:

  1. Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) per ISO 14025 for the specific EPS or EPP product.
  2. Resin supplier data: Specific PS/EPS resin cradle-to-gate PCF data from the resin producer.
  3. Recycled content: Post-consumer recycled polystyrene (rPS) content can reduce upstream emissions. rPS availability is limited (~10% global recycling rate for EPS) but growing.
  4. Factory energy data: Steam source (natural gas vs. coal vs. electric boiler), renewable electricity procurement.
  5. EPP alternative: Expanded polypropylene (EPP) data may show marginally lower emissions due to different monomer production chemistry.

Methodology Notes

Related Concepts

Related Categories

Sources

  1. PlasticsEurope (2016) — Eco-profiles: Expandable Polystyrene (EPS). Reports cradle-to-gate GWP of approximately 3.3-3.8 kgCO2e/kg for EPS granulate (pre-expansion). Post-expansion molded EPS packaging adds approximately 0.5-1.0 kgCO2e/kg for steam and molding energy.
  2. EPS Industry Alliance (2013) — EPS and the Environment. Documents lifecycle environmental performance of expanded polystyrene including production emissions, recycling potential, and comparison with alternative cushioning materials.
  3. BASF (2020) — Environmental Product Declaration for Neopor (graphite EPS). Reports GWP of 2.8-3.2 kgCO2e/kg for graphite-enhanced EPS with improved insulation and reduced material usage.
  4. Franklin Associates (2011) — Life Cycle Inventory of Foam Polystyrene, Paper-Based, and PLA Food-Service Products. Prepared for the Plastics Foodservice Packaging Group. Provides cradle-to-gate LCI data for EPS production.
  5. IEA (2024) — Emissions Factors 2024. Grid carbon intensities for major EPS manufacturing regions.
Scan a product in this category →